The New Zealand Law Journal: NZLJ., Volume 40Butterworths, 1964 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 46
Page 156
... risk of injury- implied . It is here that serious controversy begins . In what circumstances is it legitimate to imply such a consent ? How far does a man's encountering risk knowingly show that he does it voluntarily ? This is " the ...
... risk of injury- implied . It is here that serious controversy begins . In what circumstances is it legitimate to imply such a consent ? How far does a man's encountering risk knowingly show that he does it voluntarily ? This is " the ...
Page 157
... risk , ( q ) it is submitted that it is now clear that for volenti to succeed the circumstances must be such as to support the inference that the plaintiff consented to bear not merely the physical , but also the legal , risk . This ...
... risk , ( q ) it is submitted that it is now clear that for volenti to succeed the circumstances must be such as to support the inference that the plaintiff consented to bear not merely the physical , but also the legal , risk . This ...
Page 158
... risk was , the distinction between physical and legal risk cannot have been put to them with equal clarity for the issue was at best ambiguous and the Judge had not expanded the issue in his summing up . ( 2 ) The validity of the second ...
... risk was , the distinction between physical and legal risk cannot have been put to them with equal clarity for the issue was at best ambiguous and the Judge had not expanded the issue in his summing up . ( 2 ) The validity of the second ...
Contents
Building SchemesRestrictions as | 7 |
Licence by River Board to Remove Shingle | 11 |
Takeover Bids and the Press | 12 |
Copyright | |
60 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted action agreed agreement allowed Amendment Appeal application Auckland authority Board building called cause charge City claim Committee consent consideration considered contract Council counsel Country Planning Country Planning Act Country Planning Appeal course Court of Appeal damages decision defendant district duty effect erection evidence existing expressed fact further give given Government granted ground held Honour included income industrial interest Judge judgment Justice land liability Limited matter means ment necessary negligence objection Office operation opinion owner parties person plaintiff Planning Act 1953 position practice present principle proposed provision purchaser question reason recent referred regard Regulations residential respect respondent result Road rule scheme Society solicitor suggested Supreme Court taken tion Town and Country Transfer trust Wellington Zealand zoned