...knowledge upon the subject except what he obtained in the course of his professional employment. * * * We do not understand the information here referred...the physician to prescribe, was disclosed to any of bis senses, and which in any waf was brought to his knowledge for that purpose." On the other hand...

...knowledge upon the subject, except what he obtained in the course of his professional employment." .... We do not understand the information here referred...the physician, but " regard it as protecting, with a veil of privilege, whatever, in order to enable the physician to prescribe, was disclosed to any...

...The inhibition is not confined to communications made by the patient to the physician, but protects with the veil of privilege whatever, in order to enable...way was brought to his knowledge for that purpose: Briggs v. Briggs, 20 Mich. 34. "The statute covers information acquired by observation while in attendance...

...extends to any information that was disclosed to any of his senses. The rule is that the statute protects with the veil of privilege whatever, -in order to...which in any way was brought to his knowledge for that purpose.3 A communication to the physician's sense of sight is as fully within the statute as though...

...237 n, § 140 prohibition not confined to communications made by patient to physicians, but protects whatever, in order to enable the physician to prescribe, was disclosed to any of his senses 1, p. 237 n, S 146 burden on party seeking to exclude testimony 1, p. 238 n, § 146 9. Rtputation....

...evidence admissible. He had no knowledge upon the subject, except what he obtained in the course of his professional employment, and the case appears to be...referred to, to be confined to communications made b}- the patient to the physician, but regard it as protecting with the veil of privilege whatever,...

...confined to confidential communications made by the patient, but includes whatever in order to enable a physician to prescribe was disclosed to any of his...way was brought to his knowledge for that purpose;' it covers a letter written to a physician,' and matters observed by him ; ' but it does not include...

...conclusions reached; and, at page 299, cites a Michigan case which holds that the privilege extends to whatever, in order to enable the physician to prescribe,...way was brought to his knowledge for that purpose. See, also, Feeney v. LIRR Co., 116 K Y. 380; Nelson v. Village of Oneida, 156 id. 219. In Buffalo LT...

...obtained by observation) ; Mich. : 1870, Briggs v. Briggs, 20 Mich. 34, 41 (privilege includes "whatever was disclosed to any of his senses and which in any...way was brought to his knowledge for that purpose ") ; 1879, Fräser v. Jennison, 42 id. 206, 225, 3 NW 882 (same; applied to a testator's mental condition)...

...confined to confidential communications made by the patient, but includes whatever in order to enable a physician to prescribe was disclosed to any of his...which in any way was brought to his knowledge for that purpose;1 and consequently he cannot even give his opinion based entirely upon his patient's appearance...