...Government has not clearly proved its charges. Certainly the court's findings are not clearly erroneous. "A finding is 'clearly erroneous' when, although there...conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 US 364, 395. The Government's contentions have been plausibly...

...applicable." United States v. United States Oypivm Co., 333 US 864, 394 (1948). The rule was there stated that "[a] finding Is 'clearly erroneous' when although...with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Id., at 395. The evidence here, including many findings of the trial court, clearly...

...statements in other Title VII cases coming from that court,16 petitioners submit that the Court of Ap"A finding is 'clearly erroneous' when although there...with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." We note that the Court of Appeals quoted this passage at the conclusion of its...

...be judged, had great weight with the appellate court. The findings were never conclusive, however. A finding is 'clearly erroneous' when although there...with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. ' ' Scope of Agency Review The Administrative Procedure Act now provides in subsection...

...be judged, had great weight with the appellate court. The findings were never conclusive, however.14 A finding is "clearly erroneous" when although there...with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. The government relied very largely on documentary exhibits, and called as witnesses...

...P. 394. 7. Under Rule 52 (a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, a finding of fact by the trial court is "clearly erroneous" when, although there is evidence...with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. Pp. 394-395. 8. Where denials by alleged conspirators that they had acted in concert...

...Or, putting it as the Supreme Court has put it in United States v. Gypsum Co., 333 IT. S. at p. 395, "A finding is clearly erroneous, when, although there...with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.'' Appellant's third proposition, which is, in treatment, necessarily intertwined...

...to judge of the credibility of the witnesses." The Supreme Court, in applying this rule, has said: "A finding is 'clearly erroneous' when although there...conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 US 364, 395 (1948). See also United States v. Yellow Cab Co.,...

...Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp. v. New York Central R. Co., 126 F. 2d 992, 994-995 (CA 2d Cir.). A finding is clearly erroneous when "although there...conviction that a mistake has been committed," United States v. Oregon Medical Society, 343 US 326, 339; United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 US...

...erroneous." Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a). It has long been held that "... a finding is 'clearly erroneous1 when, although there is evidence to support it , the...conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. United States Gypsum Co.. et al. 333 US 364, 3g5, 68 S.Ct. 525, g2 L.Ed.2d g46 (1g48); United...