American Law Review, Volume 3Little, Brown and Company, 1869 - Law |
From inside the book
Page 89
Held , that the arrest was illegal . — The Queen v . Marsden , Law Rep . 1 C . C .
131 . Assets . — See EXECUTION ; WINDING UP , 2 . ASSIGNMENT . — See
ATTACHMENT . ASSUMPSIT . - See VENDOR AND PURCHASER OF REAL ...
Held , that the arrest was illegal . — The Queen v . Marsden , Law Rep . 1 C . C .
131 . Assets . — See EXECUTION ; WINDING UP , 2 . ASSIGNMENT . — See
ATTACHMENT . ASSUMPSIT . - See VENDOR AND PURCHASER OF REAL ...
Page 93
Held , that the former section did not authorize the company to divert a public
footpath on to land of which the company had not obtained the ownership . ( Per
Lord Cairns , L . J . ) A highway is not an easement , but a dedication to the public
of ...
Held , that the former section did not authorize the company to divert a public
footpath on to land of which the company had not obtained the ownership . ( Per
Lord Cairns , L . J . ) A highway is not an easement , but a dedication to the public
of ...
Page 94
1865 , C . was notified by the company that he was held liable for a call , as
holder of said shares . C . , finding that A . was registered , and that new
certificates had been issued to him , did nothing . In Jan . 1867 , the demand was
renewed ...
1865 , C . was notified by the company that he was held liable for a call , as
holder of said shares . C . , finding that A . was registered , and that new
certificates had been issued to him , did nothing . In Jan . 1867 , the demand was
renewed ...
Page 97
Held , that there was no such condition precedent . The 48th Canon of 1603 did
not apply to this case , but only the 39th . Moreover , these canons do not bind the
laity , proprio rigore , but only when declaratory of the ancient law of the Church ...
Held , that there was no such condition precedent . The 48th Canon of 1603 did
not apply to this case , but only the 39th . Moreover , these canons do not bind the
laity , proprio rigore , but only when declaratory of the ancient law of the Church ...
Page 99
Held , that such a structure was an “ office " and a “ place , ” within 16 & 17 Vict . c
. ... of either child , then the same was to be held for such persons as would be
the next of kin of said child at his decease , under the Statute of Distributions .
Held , that such a structure was an “ office " and a “ place , ” within 16 & 17 Vict . c
. ... of either child , then the same was to be held for such persons as would be
the next of kin of said child at his decease , under the Statute of Distributions .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admiralty agent allowed amount appear applied appointed assignee authority bank bankrupt bankruptcy bill bonds called cause charge claim common Congress Constitution contained contract court creditor damages debt decided decision defendant discharge District duty entitled evidence examination execution fact fraud give given ground Held House interest issue Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land Law Rep liable LIMITATIONS Lord matter means mortgage necessary notice object opinion owner paid party passed payment person petition plaintiff practice present principal proceedings proved purchaser question railroad reason received referred refused Reports representative respect rule secure shares ship statute suit Supreme Court taken tender term tion trust United vessel volume whole wife York