Reports of Cases Determined in the Courts of Appeal of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney, 1956 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 34
Page 356
... direct or immediate character that the intervenor will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment . " ( Emphasis added . ) ( Allen v . California Water & Tel . Co. , 31 Cal.2d 104 , 109 [ 187 P.2d 393 ] ...
... direct or immediate character that the intervenor will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment . " ( Emphasis added . ) ( Allen v . California Water & Tel . Co. , 31 Cal.2d 104 , 109 [ 187 P.2d 393 ] ...
Page 357
... direct and immediate character that the intervener will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment . Application of these principles to the present case com- pels the conclusion that the intervener did ...
... direct and immediate character that the intervener will either gain or lose by the direct legal operation and effect of the judgment . Application of these principles to the present case com- pels the conclusion that the intervener did ...
Page 358
... direct opera- tion of the judgment . The legal operation of said judgment will have no direct effect upon interveners . It is true there may be an adjudication that said act is a valid legislative enactment which might serve as a ...
... direct opera- tion of the judgment . The legal operation of said judgment will have no direct effect upon interveners . It is true there may be an adjudication that said act is a valid legislative enactment which might serve as a ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident affidavit affirmed agreement alleged Am.Jur amount Angeles Anna Appeal and Error appellant appellant's attorney automobile bank Cal.App Cal.Jur California cause of action charged Ciro Civil Procedure claim Code Civ Code of Civil Company complaint concurred contends contract corporation counsel County Criminal Law cross-complaint custody damages deed defendant defendant's divorce Edmund G entitled error coram nobis evidence fact fendant filed finding fraud guilty highway inference injury instruction intersection joint tenancy Judge judgment jury land lease Los Angeles County Manchuria matter Mel's Drive-In ment motion negligence notice oral order denying ordinance parties payment person petition plaintiff pleadings prior purchase question quiet title real property reasonable record References respondent Rogell rule Second Dist signed Skirball statute Street Superior Court supra testified testimony tion trial court verdict witness