...mark or trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive: Provided, That when the Commissioner determines that confusion, mistake,...

...ARGO owned by opposer and not abandoned, as to be likely, when applied to or used in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers thereof; and, 2. That the registration of trademark ARGO in the name of CPC International...

...1905 provides in part as follows: That in every cnso of Interference or opposition to registration he (the Commissioner) shall direct the Examiner In charge...Interferences to determine the right of registration to such n trade-mark. Since the Star Brewery Company is a registrant, it is evident that the only question...

...mark or trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers: * * * [Italics supplied.] [2] In our opinion, the significance of this change in...

...declaration of an interference in certain cases. The section further provides that in every case of interference the Commissioner shall direct the Examiner in charge of interferences — to determine the question of the right of registration to such mark * • • in such manner and upon such notice to...

...the TradeMark Act of 1905 provides that in every case of interference or opposition to registration the Commissioner shall — direct the Examiner in charge of interferences to determine the question of the right of registration to such trade-mark, and of the sufficiency of objections to registration,...

...page 3, of HR 6248: A murk which so resembles a trnde-mark previously used hy another as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion or mistake IT to deceive purchasers as to their source or origin. That is the Rolls Royce case. Mr. FRASER. Then...

...of or comprises a mark which so resembles a trade-mark previously used by another as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion or mistakes, or to deceive purchasers as to their source of origin. Mr. CARTER. Mr. Chairman, that is...

...of or comprises a mark which so resembles a trade-mark previously used by another us to be likely, when applied to the goods of the Applicant, to cause...to deceive purchasers as to their source or origin. When such previously used trade-mark is applied to .merchandise of the same descriptive properties...

...of or comprises a mark which so resembles a trade-mark previously used by another as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion or mistake or to receive purchasers as to their source of origin. Mr. ROGERS. Yes. The CHAIRMAN. Does that not answer...