The New Zealand Law Journal: NZLJ.Butterworths, 1998 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 243
... majority and Thomas J are so far apart in their interpreta- tion of the facts before them . Their competing methodolo- gies are dictated by different statutory frames of reference . THE COMPETING METHODOLOGIES Both the majority and ...
... majority and Thomas J are so far apart in their interpreta- tion of the facts before them . Their competing methodolo- gies are dictated by different statutory frames of reference . THE COMPETING METHODOLOGIES Both the majority and ...
Page 299
... majority was acceptable for choosing the candi- dates for President , was it unthinkable that that majority make the final choice ? Bill Hayden's proposal con- tained a double irony : of the models in contention , it provided the most ...
... majority was acceptable for choosing the candi- dates for President , was it unthinkable that that majority make the final choice ? Bill Hayden's proposal con- tained a double irony : of the models in contention , it provided the most ...
Page 349
... majority of the Court then turned to assess the risk that confidential information may be disclosed . Henry J analysed the risk of both general and specific information being disclosed . The general information related to , among other ...
... majority of the Court then turned to assess the risk that confidential information may be disclosed . Henry J analysed the risk of both general and specific information being disclosed . The general information related to , among other ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted action agreement allow Amendment application appointment approach arbitration authority benefit Bill body breach cause charitable circumstances claim clear client Commission common concerned conclusion consideration considered continued contract costs Council Court of Appeal criminal damages deal decision defendant determine discussion duty economic effect established evidence example existing fact firm further give given grounds held High Court important intention interest involved issue Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction justice land legislation limited majority matter means ment nature noted objective obligations operation particular parties person police position practice present principle problem proceedings proposed protection question reason referred regulations relation relevant respect responsibility result rules specific suggested tion tort trade trust Zealand