United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at ... and Rules Announced at ..., Volume 401United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner Banks & Bros., Law Publishers, 1971 - Courts |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adjudication affirmed Afroyim alleged amicus curiae appellees application argued the cause arrest Attorney bank Bar of Arizona BLACKMUN Board brief C. A. 2d Cir C. A. 5th Cir California Certiorari denied Chimel citizens citizenship claim Clause concurring conduct Congress conscientious objector constitutional constitutionally conviction Corp County Court of Appeals criminal curiae decision declaratory judgment defendant dissenting 401 U.S. District Court due process enforcement evidence Ex parte Young February 22 federal courts Fifth Amendment filed Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment Glass-Steagall Act Government granted habeas corpus held Illinois injunction issue judge judicial jurisdiction jury JUSTICE DOUGLAS Labor Louisiana Marchetti ment motion National officers Ohio person petition petitioner petitioner's plaintiff police prior proceedings prosecution protection provides question relief remanded Reported retroactive rule Stat statute statutory Supp supra Supreme Court three-judge court tion trial union United violation York Zenith
Popular passages
Page 434 - limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. * * • • • "(h) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
Page 286 - prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice'—that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.
Page 301 - Sullivan, supra. As such, he clearly fell within the rule that "prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice'—that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.
Page 820 - (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. "(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against
Page 208 - material (a) the dominant theme of which, taken as a whole, appeals to a prurient interest; (b) which is patently offensive because it affronts contemporary community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters; and (c) which is utterly without redeeming social value." And "prurient interest
Page 62 - A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments." (Emphasis added.) 3 In its initial form the "anti-injunction
Page 331 - of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure required that "[i]n pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively . . . release . . . statute of limitations . . . and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense." Rule 12 (h) at that time provided that "[a] party waives all defenses and objections which he does not present
Page 455 - is misplaced. Nor do we decide that conscientious objection to a particular war necessarily falls within §6(j)'s expressly excluded class 13 of "essentially political, sociological, or philosophical views, or a merely personal moral code." Rather, we hold that Congress intended to exempt persons who oppose participating in all war—"participation in war in any
Page 640 - investment and reinvestment of moneys contributed thereto by the bank in its capacity as a trustee, executor, administrator, or guardian . . . ." (Emphasis added.) This language, which makes no reference to contributions by the bank in its capacity as managing agent, is identical to that exempting such common trust funds from the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15
Page 98 - Except as otherwise provided by law, any party may appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying, after notice and hearing, an interlocutory or permanent injunction in any civil action, suit or proceeding required by any Act of Congress to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges.