The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist CourtIn the last twenty years, the veil of secrecy surrounding the workings of the United States Supreme Court has been lifted. Justice Thurgood Marshall's controversial decision to make his papers available to the public ushered in a new era of openness about the operation of the Court--but not without criticism from Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court provides a behind-the- scenes look at the Supreme Court, showing how changes between the drafts and the Justices' final opinions have created substantial differences in the outcome of the Court's decisions. As with his two previous works The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court and the Unpublished Opinions of the Burger Court, author Bernard Schwartz uses private court papers to follow these decisions and explore the key role and responsibility of the Chief Justice. Among the ten cases examined by Schwartz are key abortion cases Hodgson v. Minnesota and Webster v. Reproductive Health Services-- the original draft of which would have virtually overruled Roe v. Wade--as well as a civil rights case, Patterson v. McLean Credit Union. Schwartz considers the draft opinions and explains why the drafts were not issued as the final opinions and dissents in these cases. In particular, he shows what would have happened if the draft opinions had come down as the final opinions. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court serves to clarify and explore the actual operation of the judicial decision-making process. It will be fascinating and informative reading for attorneys, judges, law students, politicians and anyone interested in the mechanics of the nation's highest Court. |
Contents
3 | |
Traffic Arrests and Homicide Evidence | 30 |
Regulation Takings and Just Compensation | 65 |
Garbage In Evidence Out? | 105 |
Race and Peremptory Challenges | 135 |
Civil Rights in the Rehnquist Court | 197 |
Roe and the Swinging Pendulum | 260 |
Roe Reaffirmed | 339 |
Administrative DeadlinesMandatory or Directory? | 402 |
Magistrates Powers and Delayed Decisions | 423 |
A Tax Case Switch | 462 |
Common terms and phrases
abortion Akron appellees arrest Batson Beck Blair capital murder cert certiorari challenged Chief Justice Rehnquist claim Clause concluded concurring conduct Congress consent constitutional contract counsel Court of Appeals decision defendant discrimination District Court draft dissent draft opinion DRAFT SUPREME COURT due process enforce evidence Federal Magistrates Act felony trial Florida FMCC Fourth Amendment Gomez HODEL HODGSON homicide imposed instructions intangible property interpretation issue judge judgment jurors jury selection Justice Blackmun Justice Brennan Justice O'Connor Justice Scalia Justice Stevens Justice White lesser included offense majority Marshall MCLEAN CREDIT UNION ment MINNESOTA Missouri overrule palm print parent PATTERSON peremptory challenges petitioner petitioner's physician plaintiff police procedure prohibition prosecutor protection provides question racial harassment reasonable regulation REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES Rooney rule Runyon SIP revision stare decisis Stat statute statutory supra Texas tion Title VII TOMPKINS trash two-parent United venirepersons viability voir dire vote warrant WEBSTER woman
Popular passages
Page 18 - Oyez! Oyez! All persons having business before the Honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States, are admonished to draw near and give their attention, for the Court is now sitting. God save the United States and this Honorable Court.