Page images
PDF
EPUB

lend themselves to the gratification of this public taste?

Only a few are needed. In the ten years from 1892 to 1902, at the University of California, only seventy-five different men made the team as players or substitutes out of four thousand or more different male students during that time in attendance. As a player generally holds on for three or four years, seventy-five men, with a certain number of hopeless candidates as background, will suffice for the proposed task in any decade.

A better solution, in my opinion, is to return from the spectacle to the sport; take off the headgear and the nose-guards, and the thighpadding and the knee padding, and introduce the Association game for light men and runners, indeed, for the average man,—and the restored Rugby. perhaps with its Australian modifications, for the heavier and more vigorous men. Then let the student mass descend from its enthronement in sedentary athletics on the bleachers and get health and fun and virility out of the heartiest and manliest of our sports.

III. SUCCESSIVE STAGES OF THE AMERICAN GAME.

BY JOHN H. FINLEY.

(President of the College of the City of New York.)

IN my college days I played what was known

as "Association football; in the university I was introduced to the American Rugby game, and was a member of the 'varsity team"

[ocr errors]

for two seasons (or so much of them as was not spent in having my bones mended); later as a college president I saw the game now generally played develop in a typical Western college; then as a professor I had somewhat to do with students of one of the great Eastern universities in which the game was played in its evolved and highly specialized form; and now I am associated with a college in which football has not for some time been played. I have thus, in my experience of the game, passed through all its stages. I speak of this cycle of my personal experience, from no football to no football, because its chapters mark the course of the game in America, though the last stage has been reached by only a few institutions.

1. The game of my first experience was not without its dangers to limb, but they were not so great to life. By comparison with it, the Rugby game seemed to me, when I first witnessed and played it, unintelligible, uninterest ing, and unprofitable. I do not know how this earlier form of contest, more properly called football, now being revived, would impress me, as I have not seen it played in many years. If it is all that my memory recalls, it should be restored in our schools, at any rate. There would be this decided advantage, if the schools adopted the Association game" while the colleges kept the Rugby, that the specialization in the latter would begin much later, and that the evils growing out of the canvass of schools for promising trained material would be greatly reduced. Such

a change might help, also, to diminish the hurtful aping by schoolboys of what may safely be done by young men of college or university age. The inter-school games played before great crowds should be stopped. The good cannot be as great as the harm.

2. My experience as a member of a university team was altogether beneficial to me, despite the injuries I received. Although they were serious enough, they were insignificant, after all, by the side of the discipline and the bodily advantage. But the game was then rather primitive; there were few practice hours, few out-of-town games; there was no training-table, no coach, no armor; the players had no excuse from regular university work; they led a normal student life. The game was incidental. Under such conditions and natural restrictions (there were no artificial ones), the game was entirely whole

some.

3. As president I saw the Rugby game rise from its beginnings in the West. It had not yet been mimicked by the schools, and so its present scientific refinement was happily not possible. The danger of professionalism was not as great as in baseball. Although the ad· vantages of mere weight were even then menacing the attractiveness of the game, alertness of body and brain still had a good chance. The best scholar, in my memory of that period, was also one of the best players. The benefit of the game, as then played, to the college as a whole and to the player was unquestioned. No apology for football was needed in that time.

4. Most of its evils have come, it is not necessary to say, with its intensification, with the glorification of the player, with the profes

sionalizing of what was once but a means of recreation. We cannot go back, of course, to the more primitive form, but can it not be evolved into a genuine college sport again that can be played without professional skill, tuition, or paraphernalia ?

5. But the last state of my experience is worse than the first,-or second, or third. The fourth should have issue not in the abolition but in the

redemption of the game, for it has in it a spirit worth saving to our American student life. Perhaps those who know more about football than some of the rest of us do can, by processes of elimination, find and correct what has distorted or debased the game in recent years; and we of the teaching body can at least see that it does not have too much sympathy from our curricula,and inherited savagery.

IV.-A PHYSICAL INSTRUCTOR'S SUGGESTIONS FOR
IMPROVEMENT.

BY DUDLEY A. SARGENT, M.D.

(Director of the Hemenway Gymnasium, Harvard University.)

OLLEGE athletics form a very essential part of a scheme of physical education because they develop certain desirable mental and phys ical qualities that cannot be as well developed in any other way. Some forms of athletics, such as boxing and wrestling, bring men into more or less violent personal contact with one another, and for this reason these sports would not be tolerated in intercollegiate contests. Nevertheless, there is a deep love for antagonistic sports in human nature of both sexes, and even such athletic contests as running, rowing, swimming, baseball, hockey, and lacrosse have to be carefully safeguarded to prevent personal encounters.

[ocr errors]

The game of football as played and developed in the American colleges has afforded the best opportunities for personal encounters, because they form an essential part of it and are disguised in what is termed a "scrimmage." In the dictionary sense, a scrimmage" means "a rough-and-tumble contest." The convention of football representatives from Columbia, Princeton, Rutgers, and Yale held in New York in 1873 evidently had some conception of this feature of the game, for we read among the rules adopted for the guidance of the Intercollegiate Football Association of America the following Rule 28. No hacking, throttling, butting, tripping up, tackling below the hips, or striking with closed fist shall be allowed." This rule, still accepted by the American Intercollegiate Football Association as late as 1882, was at least nominally intended to prevent these specified kinds of offensive personal contact that experience had shown likely to occur during the progress of a game. But what shall we say of the following rule, printed in the same book of directions, defining the duties of the referee ? Rule 19. The referee . . . shall decide dis

:

puted points, and shall disqualify any player whom he has warned twice for intentional off side play, intentional tackling in touch, or intentional violation of Rule 28."

By this rule it will be readily seen that the referee is not only deprived of all power of immediate action in punishing foul play, but the player is actually allowed to hack, throttle, butt, or strike his opponent twice before he can be disqualified. In point of practice, the players of football in the early eighties were encouraged, and even commanded, by the captain on the field to take their "warning" during the progress of the game. It was the brutality and vi ciousness resulting from this kind of football that led the faculty of Harvard University to prohibit the game at that institution in 1885. though the rules governing the game have since been amended so as to punish "unnecessary roughness, throttling, hacking, or striking with the closed fist" by immediate disqualification, many other methods of doing an opponent personal injury are still made possible by the present style of play.

Al

It is hard to eradicate from the student mind the old traditions of the game that have come down from a previous generation. It is even difficult for the umpire to realize that he is not expected to be blind to a certain amount of "slugging," kneeing, elbowing, etc., and it is equally difficult for the player to understand that he is not expected to butt, hack, strike, etc., at least once during the game, if by so doing he can increase the chances of victory for his team. The much talked of team play covers a multitude of sins, and men do a lot of dirty work, under the mistaken plea of loyalty to their college, that they would shrink from doing on their own responsibility. The game has improved in

this respect of late years.

It is now considered better football to follow the man with the ball than to attempt to do up" or knock out" an opponent. The injuries from football, which unfortunately are now more numerous than ever, do not result so much from personal assaults as from the vicious method of tackling a runner below the hips (formerly prohibited), various kinds of momentum or mass plays, and the practice of piling on to the man who is downed with the ball. So long as this method of playing is practised, it will be necessary to meet force with force, and injuries will continue to be numerous, for reasons that are so obvious that they need not be mentioned. No sport has long thrived among gentlemen that admits of violent personal contact. This is the factor in sport that has killed boxing and wrestling as athletic contests in the colleges, and it is the fundamental objec tion to football as at present played. The only way to prevent injuries from objectionable personal contact and violent collisions in football is to stop trying to advance the ball toward the opponent's goal by running with it. This will at once do away with all forms of tackling, with the inevitable downs, rush-line scrimmages, and mass plays. Permit the ball to be passed, batted, kicked, or rolled in any direction, and allow, if necessary, blocking or interference with the flight of the ball from player to player or toward the goal, but do not allow, under any circumstances, a player to lay hands upon or interfere with an opponent when he has the ball.

This requirement, which protects the man with the ball, should be followed by another making it obligatory upon him not to hold the

ball, but to pass it quickly to some other player on his own side who may have run to some more advantageous position to receive it. In order to make the attainment of a goal more difficult, the goals should be kicked, and not thrown, and the form of the goals through which the ball is kicked should be a vertical square or circle, made small enough and placed low enough to give a better opportunity for defense than is afforded by the present game. Other specific directions should follow as a matter of course.

It will be observed that the game that I would substitute for modern football is a combination of the good points of football and basketball. The rules of such a game could be made very simple, and twenty or thirty men on a side could play it at the same time. The crying need of our colleges to-day is not for the highly specialized and over-strenuous games that only few men can play, but for more simple games in which a greater number may take part. If athletics have any place in our institutions of learning, they should be so conducted that all the students attending may get some good from them. With this end in view, our schools and colleges should open up the best possible facilities for the practice of all the approved forms of sports, games, and physical exercises. Unless the present interest in athletics take some such practical turn as this, it will soon be a disgrace for an institution of learning to turn out a victorious athletic team, and the attendance of forty thousand persons at a football game, the spirit and practice of which they condemn, may be considered evidence of our moral decadence.

V.-CAN THE GAME BE CONTROLLED AND REMODELED?

BY LUTHER H. GULICK, M.D.

(Director of physical training in the public, elementary, and high schools of New York City; secretary of the Public Schools Athletic League.)

WE

HEN five hundred children are turned loose on a space of ground which in the old school days would have served fifty children for recess it is not possible for them to play freely; they interfere with one another. The children being placed so much more closely together has greatly increased all those difficulties which are involved in social relations. The complexity of the situation has been greatly increased. In order that the five hundred children may play as freely as possible, it is necessary that there be some older person who shall main

tain order; who shall see that the available space. is not monopolized by the few big and strong ones. He shall, when necessary, suggest plays and games adapted to the difficult and new conditions under which the children find themselves. In order that the play may be most free, it must be somewhat controlled. This control does not extend to the play itself, but is directed at the government of those conditions which are new,

namely, the social intensity and complexity due to the large number of children in the limited space, and the furnishing the information

with reference to specific plays which have not yet had time enough to be evolved by the children themselves. The object of the control is to let the children play freely. The method is the control of those elements in the environment which are new and too complex and difficult to be handled by the children themselves.

The principle obtains wherever the conditions under which people play become rapidly changed. For example, the present situation with reference to college athletics in general and college football in particular shows the inadequacy of the uncontrolled free-play idea as applied to college students under the present conditions of intercollegiate athletics. There is a general and very old feeling among educational authorities that the recreation of all college students is much better when directed by the students themselves, that this direction is in itself a part of the play, that it affords useful training in various directions, to all of which I most willingly assent, but during the past few years new elements have been introduced into the college athletic situation which make the college student almost as unable to have general free play in his athletics as the city pupil is to have free play on his uncontrolled and limited city playground. The amounts of money involved are very great. The games have acquired a commercial significance which is altogether new in college sport. There are funds available which were never dreamed of in the earlier and more simple days of college sport. The intense rivalry between institutions is only one of a number of factors which has tended to change the notion of sport for the fun of it to sport for the sake of victory,-victory being thus augmented from a very desirable incident to an end in itself. This case, then, like that of the city school child, demands trained technical control. The problems are too difficult of solution by the men themselves; their life in college is too brief to permit of these large questions being worked out satisfactorily during the experience of any student.

If we grant the principle, the application will be that this control must be of such a nature, and to such an extent, as will most truly give that freedom in athletics that will most truly restore sport as a means of recreation and health to its natural place. This control must be, as in the case of the city pupil, to restore freedom in play rather than to take it away. The elements which are to be controlled and managed are the new ones rather than the old ones.

We are at present undergoing a storm of discussion as to the changes in the rules that will cure the present football disease. We are not in a position to pass upon cures at the present time. What we need is to establish the principle and the nature of control. The changing of rules will not alter ethical relations. The chief needs at present, with reference to athletics, are ethical rather than physiological.

To reduce this discussion to a definite proposition, let me say that I believe the athletics of educational institutions should be under the absolute control of a man whose relation to the faculty is the same as that of any other head of a department whose training for his work, both in practical knowledge and scholastic attainment, is as extended and technical as is demanded of a professor in any other branch, and whose tenure of office is as certain as that of other college professorships. The primary qualifications of this man, so far as practical work is concerned, must be the ability to get a very large number of the students actually engaged, voluntarily, in wholesome out-of-door athletics rather than to defeat other collegiate teams upon the gridiron or the cinder path.

College football needs to be controlled and remodeled, but this can only be wisely done by men who continuously administer the college sports; who administer the games as a means to exercise rather than as an intercollegiate means of contest. We need continuous trained control of the situation by high-grade men whose positions are not dependent upon victory.

TURKEY VERSUS EUROPE IN THE
THE BALKANS.

BY DR. MAURICE BAUMFELD.
(American correspondent of the Vienna Neue Freie Presse.)

IN
N the realm of international politics the con-
flict which the Sultan has been waging
against the six European powers for the past
weeks has been second in importance only to
the historical events now occurring in the Rus-
sian Empire, a conflict not without its serious
dangers. It may seem paradoxical that with
Turkey on the one side, England, France, Rus-
sia, Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy on the
other, even a merely formal resort to arms could
not be prevented. This is subject to but one inter-
pretation, that the Sultan did not believe in the
unity of these powers until the very last moment;
that he left nothing untried to draw them into
conflicting interests, hoping that his old Oriental
political method of postponement, of half-hearted
concessions, of shamefaced and shameful threats,
would again prove successful.

During the conferences held several years ago in Vienna and at Muerzsteg between the Austrian Emperor, Francis Joseph, and the Russian Emperor, Nicholas, to which the two ministers for foreign affairs, Count Goluchowski and Count Lamsdorff, were summoned, a mutually agreeable regulation of affairs in the Balkans was arrived at, and many important resolutions were adopted, referring particularly to the bettering of conditions in Macedonia. Macedonia, with its predominantly Christian population, has for many years been the center of serious revolutions and revolts, each one threatening the infinitely greater danger of a general rebellion on the part of all the European possessions of the Sultan. This would mean the downfall of Turkey, an event which all the powers are at present anxious to prevent. In order to fully comprehend the true state of affairs, we must, first of all, remember that in the past few years all the joint actions of the powers have been devoted to a common purpose,—namely, the preservation of Turkish territory and the pacification, by the introduction of expedient reforms, of the suppressed and constantly revolting elements.

The Muerzsteg programme was devoted to the same cause. It demanded the nomination of a special governor-general to be appointed by Turkey. In addition to this, Austria-Hungary and Russia were each entitled to a civil commissioner delegated to exercise a certain control over the government of the country. Further

more, it demanded a reorganization of the military forces throughout the entire country, to be placed under the supervision of an Italian officer as commander-in-chief and sixty officers chosen from the armies of the great powers. The main purposes of this reorganization were, primarily, to be able in due time to suppress the many smaller revolts which arise in Macedonia almost throughout the entire year, and, furthermore, to insure the Christian population against Mohammedan despotism. After the usual delay, Turkey consented that these measures be carried out. This was done for two years, for a period expiring March, 1906. agreement had already been made in the Muerzsteg programme that the contracting powers have the right to decide upon the prolongation of this term and then merely to inform Turkey of this fact. Therefore, when, in the course of the transactions of the past weeks, the Sultan offered such a prolongation beyond March, 1906, as a concession on his part, it was merely one of the many maneuvers by which he believed he could preserve his authority.

The

In the course of these two years it had be come evident that the attempts to maintain peace in Macedonia were unsuccessful and would remain so unless a regulation of financial matters could be accomplished. Every tax and duty in the land had thus far been collected by the Turkish pashas, and had been utilized in the well-known Turkish way, the greater portion being added to the private property of these dig. nitaries, the smaller portion reaching the Padishah, whereas the taxpayers derived no appreciable benefits whatsoever from these burdens. Not only the Christian, but also the Mohammedan, population of Macedonia became thoroughly tired of this robbery. The latter, therefore, sanctions and supports the demand of the powers that these duties and taxes be controlled and used for the general good of Macedonia by a European finance commission consisting of six members. The members of this commission, one for each of the six powers,-received their appointments many weeks ago, and have already arrived at their posts. However, following the injunction of the Sultan, the governorgeneral has refused his sanction to their official activity. The opposition against their activity

« PreviousContinue »