Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 11
Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, John Worth Kern, Francis Marion Dice, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy
Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1859 - Law reports, digests, etc
"With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies).
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action agreed agreement alleged amount answer appellant appellee assigned authority averred bank bill cause cent charge Circuit Court claim Common Pleas complaint constitution contained contract costs Court of Common damages debt December decided deed defendant demurrer denial dollars effect entitled error evidence exceptions execution expenses facts filed finding follows give given ground held indictment indorsement instruction insured intent interest issue John judge judgment judgment is affirmed jury justice land matter ment mortgage motion necessary notice objection offered opinion overruled paid paragraph party payment person plaintiff pleadings possession present proceedings prove purchase question Railroad reason received record recover reference refused rendered reversed road rule secure sold statute sufficient suit sustained taken Term thereof tion trial verdict whole witness
Page 441 - If there are two or more defendants, and the action can be severed, a like offer may be made by one or more defendants, against whom a separate judgment may be taken.
Page 366 - Every act shall embrace but one subject, and matters properly connected therewith ; which subject shall be expressed in the title. But if any subject shall be embraced in an act, which shall not be expressed in the title, such act shall be void only as to so much thereof as shall not be expressed in the title.
Page 141 - The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.
Page 484 - That if any person or persons violate the provisions of this Act, either in person or through another, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more than two thousand dollars; and that the jurisdiction for the prosecution of said misdemeanor shall be within the district of the United States court in which it is committed.
Page 77 - In general, a sum of money, in gross, to be paid for the nonperformance of an agreement, is considered as a penalty, the legal operation of which is to cover the damages which the party, in whose favor the stipulation is made, may have sustained from the breach of contract by the opposite party.
Page 40 - The general rule resulting from considerations as well of justice as of policy is that he who engages in the employment of another for the performance of specified duties and services, for compensation, takes upon himself the natural and ordinary risks and perils incident to the performance of such services, and, in legal presumption, the compensation is adjusted accordingly.
Page 99 - No will nor any part thereof, shall be revoked, unless by burning, tearing, canceling or obliterating the same, with the intention of revoking it, by the testator, or by some person in his presence and by his direction...
Page 562 - ... it shall not be necessary to set forth the manner in which or the means by which the death of the deceased was caused, but it shall be sufficient in any indictment for murder to charge that the defendant did feloniously, wilfully, and of his malice aforethought, kill and murder the deceased...
Page 83 - ... 1. By failing to appear at the trial. 2. By written consent, in person or by attorney, filed with the clerk. 3. By oral consent in open court, entered in the minutes, § 267.