 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1845 - 852 pages
...thereof." By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively. Secondly, The new states have the... | |
 | William Thompson Howell - Mines and mineral resources - 1846 - 40 pages
...powers * * * By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at the general conclusions, First: The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively. Secondly, the new states have thesnme... | |
 | Michigan. Legislature. Senate - 1846 - 272 pages
...powers. * * * By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at the general'conclusions, First: The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively. Secondly, The new states have the... | |
 | Michigan. Legislature - Michigan - 1846 - 276 pages
...powers. * * * By the preceding course of reasoning we have arrived at the general'conclusions, First: The shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively. Secondly, The new states have the... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1846 - 1104 pages
...the navigable waters and the soil over which the tide ffows, were not granted by the constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; and the rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction of the new States over this subject, is co-extensive with that... | |
 | California. Legislature. Senate - California - 1853 - 1398 pages
..." that by the preceding course of reasoning, we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, The shores of navigable waters and the soils under...States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Secondly, The new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over the subject, as the... | |
 | California. Legislature. Assembly - 1853 - 1292 pages
..." that by the preceding course of reasoning, we have arrived at these general conclusions : First, The shores of navigable waters and the soils under...States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Secondly, The new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over the subject, as the... | |
 | United States. Attorney-General - Administrative law - 1858 - 600 pages
...that the shores of navigable waters, and the soil under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively ; and the new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this subject as the original States. This... | |
 | Louis Houck - Harbors - 1868 - 268 pages
...cases.3 We can, then, well say, that it has been settled by the highest tribunal in this country, 1st, that the shores of navigable waters and the soils under them were not 1 See ante, ยงยง 111-114. 8 Pollard's Lessee e. Hagan, 12 How. 224. 3 See 9 How. 471 ; 10 How. 82;... | |
 | Illinois. General Assembly. Senate - Illinois - 1872 - 934 pages
...therefor." The shores of navigable waters, and soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the states respectively, and the new states have the same rights, sovereignty and jurisdiction over this subject as the original states. Pollard... | |
| |
First, the shores of navigable waters, and the soils under them, were not granted by the Constitution to the United States, but were reserved to the States respectively. Second, the new States have the same rights, sovereignty, and jurisdiction over this... 
