 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 966 pages
...different claim or demand, the judgment in the former action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was. rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 722 pages
...between the same parties, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - Law reports, digests, etc - 1914 - 768 pages
...different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 718 pages
...cause of action in this suit, there is no question that the former judgment is an estoppel as to those matters in issue or points controverted upon the determination of which the decree was rendered. Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US 351 ; Equitable Trust Co. v. Fisher, 106 111.... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - Law reports, digests, etc - 1959 - 820 pages
...different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment... | |
 | William Wait - Actions and defenses - 1879 - 1002 pages
...different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US (4 Otto) 351. See antt, p. 679, tit. Estoppel.... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1882 - 1904 pages
...different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all these cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1886 - 1942 pages
...involved in the first action, ihc judgment in such first action operates as an estoppel only to those matters in issue, or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. H At Law. Berry hill & Henry, for plaintiff. SM Marsh, 0. J. Taylor, and JH... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1888 - 1462 pages
...decisions to that effect, that the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue, or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. The inquiry in such case, therefore, we said, must always be as to the point... | |
| |
But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or... 
