A Reply to the Review of Judge Advocate General Holt, of the Proceedings, Findings and Sentence, of the General Court Martial: In the Case of Major General Fitz John Porter, and a Vindication of that Officer |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
A Reply to the Review of Judge Advocate General Holt, of the Proceedings ... Reverdy Johnson No preview available - 2016 |
Common terms and phrases
answer appear apply arms army attack attempt authority believe belligerent bill called cause character citizens civil claim command committed condition Congress considered Constitution course Court danger direct doubt duty effect election enemy England English equipped evidence executive existence fact fitted force foreign give given Government ground Habeas Corpus hold House intent issue Judge Advocate judgment justice law of nations less liberty limitation matter means ment military nature necessary neutral never object obligations officers opinion party passed peace person political Pope port Porter position present President principle privilege protection proved provisions question reason rebellion rebels received reference relations require respect rule ship slave slavery statute supposed taken thing thought tion Union United vessel violation whole witness Writ
Popular passages
Page 12 - Texas, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in the marshals by law...
Page 6 - That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and especially the right of each State to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively...
Page 27 - But there is nothing in our laws, or in the law of nations, that forbids our citizens from sending armed vessels, as well as munitions of war, to foreign ports for sale. It is a commercial adventure which no nation is bound to prohibit, and which only exposes the persons engaged in it to the penalty of confiscation.
Page 6 - ... employed in. the service of any foreign prince, state, or potentate, or of any foreign colony, province, or part of any province or people...
Page 7 - Majesty, for that purpose first had and obtained as aforesaid, shall, by adding to the number of the guns of such vessel, or by changing those on board for other guns, or by the addition of any equipment for war...
Page 47 - The modern usage of nations, which has become law," — mark the words, Mr. Speaker, — " the modern usage of nations, which has become law," — — " would be violated ; that sense of justice and of right, which is acknowledged and felt by the whole civilized world, would be outraged, — if private property should be generally confiscated, and private rights annulled.
Page 5 - On the contrary, if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors.
Page 203 - Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures, of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions.
Page 16 - Oh! happy state! when souls each other draw, When love is liberty, and nature law: All then is full, possessing and possess'd, No craving void left aching in the breast: Ev'n thought meets thought, ere from the lips it part, And each warm wish springs mutual from the heart.