The Tenth Amendment and State Sovereignty: Constitutional History and Contemporary Issues

Front Cover
Mark Robert Killenbeck
Rowman & Littlefield, 2002 - History - 198 pages
In the wake of the 2000 Election, the relationship between the Supreme Court and the American states has become more important. Once derided by the Supreme Court as a 'truism,' the Tenth Amendment has in recent years been transformed from a neglected provision into a vital 'first principle.' As such, it has provided the foundation for a series of decisions in which the Supreme Court has elevated the status of the states, often at the expense of federal power and in the face of previously settled assumptions. In this important volume, four prominent scholars—two historians and two law professors—examine carefully one of the central tenets in the Supreme Court's recent Tenth Amendment jurisprudence: the assumption that the results fashioned by a narrow majority are compelled by history and consistent with the intentions of the framers. They shed important new light on a series of decisions that mark a major change in our thinking about the nature of a constitutional system within which both the federal government and the states properly regard themselves as sovereign entities.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


No Harm in Such a Declaration?
The Tenth Amendment over Two Centuries More than a Truism
American Federalism Was There an Original Understanding?
Federalism and Judicial Review
Revolution or Retreat?
Case Index
Subject Index
About the Contributors

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2002)

Mark R. Killenbeck is Wylie H. Davis Professor of Law at the University of Arkansas.

Bibliographic information