 Where it is neutral, the act of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner, by the gravest importance of such an act to the public service of the captor's own state ; to the neutral it can only be justified, under any such circumstances, by...  Report of the ... Conference - Page 135by International Law Association. Conference - 1906Full view - About this book
 | John Dodson - Admiralty - 1828 - 570 pages
...is to dismiss. Where it is neutral, the act of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner, by the gravest importance of such an act to the public...such circumstances, by a full restitution in value. These are rules so clear in principle and established in practice, that they require neither reasoning... | |
 | Great Britain. High Court of Admiralty, John Dodson - Admiralty - 1828 - 564 pages
...the property belongs to a neutral, the act of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner by the gravest importance of such an act to the public service of the captor's own state - ibid. . if he destroys property for the protection of which a British licence had been granted, he... | |
 | William Tarn Pritchard - Admiralty - 1847 - 808 pages
...she herself was not directly involved, the captor or his government is answerable for the spoliation. The gravest importance of such an act to the public service of the captor's own state will not justify its commission. The neutral is entitled to full restitution in value. The Felicity,... | |
 | International law - 1848 - 470 pages
...is to dismiss. Where it is neutral, the act of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner by the gravest importance of such an act to the public...such circumstances, by a full restitution in value." 1 Cruisers making captures are also directed by the general instructions of the Admiralty to bring... | |
 | Richard Wildman - International law - 1849 - 662 pages
...is to dismiss. Where it is neutral, the act of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner by the gravest importance of such an act to the public...state ; to the neutral it can only be justified under such circumstances by a full restitution in value. These are rules so clear in principle, and so established... | |
 | Admiralty - 1853 - 702 pages
...the property belongs to a neutral, the act of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner by the gravest importance of such an act to the public service of the captor's own state .... R-. if he destroys property for the protection of which a British license had been granted, he... | |
 | Robert Phillimore - International law - 1857 - 660 pages
...herself was not directly involved, the captor, or his Government, is responsible for the spoliation. The gravest importance of such an act to the public service of the captor's own State will not justify its commission. The Neutral is entitled to full restitution in value. (&) Severe damages... | |
 | Philip Anstie Smith - Civil rights - 1862 - 56 pages
...is to dismiss. Where it is neutral, the act of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner, by the gravest importance of such an act to the public...such circumstances, by a full restitution in value. These are rules so clear in principle and established in practice, that they require neither reasoning... | |
 | Sir Travers Twiss - International law - 1863 - 582 pages
...destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner by the gravest importance of H1<1( such an act to the captor's own State. To the neutral it can only...under any such circumstances, by a full restitution in value2. $ 1 68. In order to constitute a capture at sea, an what in act of taking possession is not... | |
 | Travers Twiss - International law - 1863 - 582 pages
...of destruction cannot be justified to the neutral owner by the gravest importance of such an act to the captor's own State. To the neutral it can only be justified, under an}' such circumstances, by a full restitution in value2. ยง 1 68. In order to constitute a capture... | |
| |
