 It need not have been foreseen or or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence.  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Page 278by Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Richard W. Cooper, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner - 1919Full view - About this book
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 720 pages
...comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work...incidental to the character of the business and not imlepend- . ent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | Law - 1921 - 510 pages
...said to arise out of, and be incident to, the employment. The rule adopted by some of the courts that, "the causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood/' is therefore not strictly correct. Acts Personal to the Employee — Injunemay arise out of the employment,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1915 - 1228 pages
...comes from a ha/,;ird to which the workman would have been equally exposed, apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work...the relation of master and servant. It need not have hoen foreseen or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 1226 pages
...comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work...its origin in a risk connected with the employment, ¡ind to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence." In re McNichols, 215 Mass. 408, 102... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 1156 pages
...which th« workmen would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative Jauger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the...be incidental to the character of the business and cot independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 1228 pages
...different language, In Ютbol v. Industrial Accident Commission, supra, a part of the statement being: "The causative danger must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood." When measured by the standards set down in these cases, it is not difficult to satisfactorily conclude... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 1212 pages
...497, 102 NE 697, LR A. 1910A, 30G; Bryant v. Fissell, 84 NJ Law, 72, 86 Atl. 458. "It [the accident] need not have been foreseen or expected, but after the event it must nppar to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment and to have (lowed from that source... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 960 pages
...comes from a hazard to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work,...It need not have been foreseen or expected ; but, afU-r the event, it must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 1132 pages
...comes from a hazanl to which the workman would have been equally exposed apart from the employment. The causative danger must be peculiar to the work,...expected, but after the event it must appear to have li:id its origin in a risk connected with the employment, and to have Sowed from that source as a rational... | |
 | Connecticut - Connecticut - 1917 - 1198 pages
...compensation. This case also lays down the principle that the hazard which gives rise to compensation must be peculiar to the work and not common to the neighborhood. That the Act may benefit one doing something not in the strict line of his duty but incidental to his... | |
| |
