The New Zealand Law Journal: NZLJ.Butterworths, 1993 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 90
Page 77
... Court of Appeal level . In Cleveland v Roberts ( Court of Appeal , ČA 130/90 , 123-4 / 91 , 23 November 1992 ) the Court of Appeal clarified a number of aspects of the operation of the provisions . In this article Andrew Butler ...
... Court of Appeal level . In Cleveland v Roberts ( Court of Appeal , ČA 130/90 , 123-4 / 91 , 23 November 1992 ) the Court of Appeal clarified a number of aspects of the operation of the provisions . In this article Andrew Butler ...
Page 135
... Court of Appeal might be persuaded by Counsel to overrule the decision in McLaren Maycroft . The basis of the argument is that there should be concurrent liability in contract and tort for a breach of the duty of care . It is suggested ...
... Court of Appeal might be persuaded by Counsel to overrule the decision in McLaren Maycroft . The basis of the argument is that there should be concurrent liability in contract and tort for a breach of the duty of care . It is suggested ...
Page 458
... Court of Appeal and the High Court are never referred to in spoken or written form as “ Judge ( surname ) " . If they have a title that is used , or " Justice ( surname ) " . For such Judges the title " Judge " is only used in informal ...
... Court of Appeal and the High Court are never referred to in spoken or written form as “ Judge ( surname ) " . If they have a title that is used , or " Justice ( surname ) " . For such Judges the title " Judge " is only used in informal ...
Contents
PUBLISHED BY BUTTERWORTHS | 1 |
CENSORSHIP | 16 |
CONSTITUTIONAL | 22 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
24 September accepted action application appointed approach arrest Auckland Australia authority bank Bill of Rights breach cause circumstances claim Commission Committee common law concerned Conference consideration considered constitutional continued contract Council Court of Appeal Crown decision defendant discussion duty effect established evidence example existence expressed fact further give given held High Court human important interest involved issue Judge judgment judicial Justice land lawyers legislation limited major matter means Minister nature noted NZLR officer Parliament particular parties person political position possible practice present principle problem protection question reasonable received recent reference regard relating relationship relevant remedies respect responsibility result rule Society statute statutory suggested tort Tribunal trust United University Wellington Zealand