 | Thomas Hart Benton - United States - 1854 - 784 pages
...was, in his opinion, unconstitutional. The constitution expressly provided that no preference should be given, by any regulation of commerce, to the ports of one State over those of another ; and this would be the effect of adopting the amendment. Thus, great injustice and... | |
 | Thomas Hart Benton - United States - 1854 - 762 pages
...was, in his opinion, unconstitutional. The constitution expressly provided that no preference should be given, by any regulation of commerce, to the ports of one State over those of another; and this would be the effect of adopting the amendment. Thus, great injustice and... | |
 | Thomas Hart Benton - United States - 1856 - 764 pages
...in his opinion, unconstitutional. The constitution expressly provided that uo preference should fee given, by any regulation of commerce, to the ports of one State over those of another ; and this would be the effect of adopting the amendment. Thus, great injustice and... | |
 | United States. Congress, Thomas Hart Benton - Law - 1859 - 822 pages
...was, in his opinion, unconstitutional. The constitution expressly provided that no preference should be given, by any regulation of commerce, to the ports of one State over those of another ; and this would be the effect of adopting the amendment. Thus, great injustice and... | |
 | John Adams Dix - United States - 1864 - 484 pages
...business of piloting. But there are other objections of a graver character. The Constitution provides that no preference shall be given, by any regulation of commerce, to the ports of one State over those of another. We insist that such a preference is given by the act of Congress. Massachusetts is... | |
 | Louis Houck - Harbors - 1868 - 268 pages
...277. We will discuss these various subjects in their order. We have seen that the Federal Constitution declares, that no preference shall be given by any...regulation of commerce to the ports of one State over another ; but the Constitution further provides, that " no State shall, without the consent of Congress,... | |
 | George Washington Paschal - Constitutional law - 1868 - 448 pages
...stricken out of the Constitution of the Confederate States. This clause read: "No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce to the ports of one State over tbose of another." And very heavy export duties were levied upon cotton, first by military orders,... | |
 | George Washington Paschal - Constitutional law - 1868 - 438 pages
...stricken out of the Constitution of the Confederate States. This clause read: 4*No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce to the ports of one State over those of another." And very heavy export duties were levied upon cotton, first by military orders,... | |
 | George Washington Paschal - Constitutional law - 1868 - 538 pages
...stricken out of the Constitution of the Confederate States. This clause read: ''No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce to the ports of one Stale over those of another." And very heavy export duties were levied upon cotton, first by military... | |
 | George Washington Paschal - Constitutional law - 1868 - 452 pages
...stricken out of the Constitution of the Confederate States. This clause read: ''No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce to the ports of one Stale over those of another." And very heavy export duties were levied upon cotton, first by military... | |
| |
Constitution which declares that no preference should be given by any regulation of commerce to the ports of one State over those of another. 
