...statute forbidding resort to common-law remedies was contrary to the public policy of New Hampshire, and that the full faith and credit clause does not require a State to enforce an act of another State which is contrary to the public policy of the forum. The Court admitted...

...statute forbidding resort to common-law remedies was contrary to the public policy of New Hampshire, and that the full faith and credit clause does not require a State to enforce an act of another State which is contrary to the public policy of the forum. The Court admitted...

...succession in the first State. Robertson v. Pickrell, 109 US 608; Overby v. Gordon, 177 US 214. Surely, the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require a State to give an advantage to persons dwelling without, when State policy may justifiably restrict its own citizens...

...provision, we think the conclusion is unavoidable that the full faith and credit clause does not require one state to substitute for its own statute, applicable to persons and events within it, the conflicting statute of another state, even though that statute is of controlling force in the courts...

...held that the exclusive nature of the Massachusetts Act was "obnoxious" to the policy of California. The Court proceeded on the premise, repeated over...State reflecting a conflicting and opposed policy. Id., at 502. The Pacific Employers Insurance Co. case allowed the Compensation Act of the place of...

...stated that: "[T]he conclusion is unavoidable that the full faith and credit clause does not require one state to substitute for its own statute, applicable to persons and events within it, the conflicting statute of another state, even though that statute is of controlling force in the courts...

...persons and events within the forum,23* ". . . the full faith and credit clause does not require one state to substitute for its own statute, applicable to persons and events within it, the conflicting statute of another state, even though that statute is of controlling force in the courts...

...persons and events within the forum, 23 ' ". .. the full faith and credit clause does not require one state to substitute for its own statute, applicable to persons and events within it, the conflicting statute of another state, even though that statute is of controlling force in the courts...

...this Court to limit the judicial powers that California has exercised in this case. Pp. 418-421. (c) The Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require a State to apply another State's law in violation of its own legitimate public policy. Pacific In*. Co. v. Industrial...

...situations, the courts of one State must apply the statutory law of another State." 17 Emphasizing, however, that "the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not require a State to apply another State's law in violation of its own legitimate public policy," 1s the majority found...