...(2d) 867, affirmed the decision of the Board. No petition for a writ of certiorari was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States to review the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals. 15. Deficiencies for 1919 and 1920 were assessed on August 10, 1929, in the...

...of the city, as it waa assumed for public use. It was insisted, in favor of the jurisdiction of the supreme court of the United States, to review the decision of the State court, that the case was within and arose under the provision of the constitutional amendments...

...further payment of dividends, by the writ of error, which was made a supersedeas, issued out of the Supreme Court of the United States to review the decision of the Supreme Court of this State, affirming the decision of the Circuit Court of Cook county, which perpetuated...

...was called in question. Calcóte v. Stanton, 18 How. 243, 15: 348 1955. A writ of error lies from the Supreme Court of the United States to review the decision of the highest court of a state ngainst the validity of n title claimed under a sale in bankruptcy. Such a...

...every principle of justice. This is especially flagrant in the suing out of writs of error from the Supreme Court of the United States to review the decision of the highest courts of criminal jurisdiction in the different states. We recommend that no writ of error...

...Sinclair was found guilty, fined $500 and sentenced to ninety days' imprisonment. Sinclair asked the Supreme Court of the United States to review the decision of the lower court, and argued that the investigation was beyond the power of Congress, since the subject...

...afforded appropriate hearings to parties interested under the provisions of subdivisions (&) and (o) of that section. From the findings of said commission...of certiorari for the Supreme Court of the United States to review the decision of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals was denied on October 13,...

...afforded appropriate hearing to parties interested under the provisions of subdivisions (b) and (c) of that section. From the findings of said Commission...Patent Appeals affirmed the findings of the Commission. By order of the President dated March 2, 1933, under subdivision (f) of section 337 of the Tariff Act...

...subdivisions (b) and (c) of that section. Prom the findings of said Commission respecting slide fasteners, an appeal was taken within the time and in the manner...Patent Appeals affirmed the findings of the Commission. On February 5, 1934, copies of the Commission's findings respecting parts of slide fasteners were mailed...

...every principle of justice. This was especially flagrant in the suing out of writs of error from the Supreme Court of the United States to review the decision of the highest courts of criminal jurisdiction in the different states. By the act approved March 10, 1908...