 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1857 - 650 pages
...borne by the bill before the amendment. This is the more obvious and reasonable since the constitution provides that 'No bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title.' • *.*****«**** "That the power to make laws is vested in the... | |
 | Law - 1892 - 582 pages
...enactment itself, fails to conform to section 28, article 4, of the Constitntion of Missouri, which provides that " no bill * * * shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title," and the act is therefore inoperative and void. The title of the... | |
 | Ohio - Session laws - 1873 - 622 pages
...the title borne by the bill before such amendment. This is the more obvious, since the Constitution provides that " no bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title." Nor does the fact that the inserted matter is called a " new bill,"... | |
 | Ohio. Constitutional Convention - Constitutional conventions - 1874 - 1110 pages
...by the bill before the amendment. This is the more obvious and reasonaI ble since the Constitution provides that, 'No bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly ev: pressed m its title."1 The provision of the present Constitution, which says that no... | |
 | Ohio. General Assembly. Senate - Ohio - 1875 - 810 pages
...offered the following resolution : SR No. 84 : WHEREAS, The Constitution of Ohio, Art. 2, Sec. 16, provides that "no bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title;" and WHEREAS, An act entitled an act "making partial appropriations... | |
 | Ohio - Law - 1879 - 1232 pages
...the title borne by the bill before such amendment. This is the more obvious, since the Constitution agreed upon be clearly expressed in its tille." Nor does the fact that the inserted matter is called a "new bill,"... | |
 | Timothy Walker - Law - 1882 - 850 pages
...State archives in the custody of the secretary. Out of abundant caution, however, our constitution provides that no bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title ; and that no law shall be revived or amended, unless the new act... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1883 - 1674 pages
...constitution of the state, the first of which, — that it conflicts with section 19, art. 2, which declares that "no bill shall contain more than one subject,...shall be clearly expressed in its title," — it is claimed, applies to both acts. In regard to the special act of February 18, 1873, however, it seems... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1883 - 890 pages
...Constitution of the State, the first of which, — that it conflicts with sect. 19, art. 2, which declares that " no bill shall contain more than one subject,...shall be clearly expressed in its title," — it is claimed, applies to both acts. In regard to the special act of Feb. 18, 1873, however, it seems to... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1915 - 1230 pages
...justice administered without delay." Third. Section 16 of article 2 of the state Constitution, which provides that: "No bill shall contain more than one...which shall be clearly expressed in its title." It is also argued that the statute deprives the citizen of a right of trial by Jury, and for that reason... | |
| |
... no bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title," — it is claimed, applies to both acts. 
