Page images
[blocks in formation]


People v. Evanuk

ex rel. Bryant v. Zim

[blocks in formation]


(N. Y.)


v. Minister of Finance (Can.) 794

Peytavin Planting Co., Grace

Smyth, Boyd v.

(Iowa) 1381

[blocks in formation]

Snodgrass, Stoddard v.

(Or.) 1160

Piper, Mile Wide Copper Co.

Southern Can Co. v. Sachs



(Ariz.) 1359

Speight v. Simonsen

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

(Iowa) 1141 (Ky.) 803 (Mass.) 1280

Spokane Valley Growers' Union, Northern P. R. Co. v.

(Wash.) 194

Portsmouth v. Mitchell


Spring v. Leahy

(Mass.) 1203


(Ohio) 961

Stafford, Barnesville v.

(Ga.) 1045


Stafford-Smith Co., Yellow Cab Co. v.

(Ill.) 1173

State v. Brownfield

(La.) 475

Quaker Maid, Danville v! ... (Ky.) 590

ex rel. Hegewald, Charles Hegewald Co. v.

(Ind.) 775


v. Devot

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

rel. Mutual Tank Line Co. v. Gunder

ex rel. Hegewald, Hegewald (Charles) Co.

rel. West Virginia
Sand & Gravel Co.
v. Royal Indemnity
(W. Va.)

ex rel. Nenzel v. Second

Judicial Dist. Ct. (Nev.) 1331

(S. D.)


(Ind.) 775


(N. Y.) 512

v. Tinnin



Richardson, Lawley v.


Roberts, Reynolds v.

(Okla.) (Kan.)

Rosenthal, Paccos v.

Royal Indemnity Co., State ex

rel. West Virginia

Sand & Gravel Co.


[blocks in formation]

(Wash.) 1263

Steber v. Norris

(Wis.) 501


Stevens, Moore v.

Stephens v. Blackwood Lumber

Stevens (Britton) Motors Co.,

(N. C.) 426

(Fla.) 1127

[blocks in formation]

Wall v.

(Mass.) 647

Stewart Dry Goods Co., Fideli


ty & C. Co. v.

(Ky.) 318

Stoddard v. Snodgrass

(Or.) 1160

[blocks in formation]

Stone (J. D.) & Co., Leicht

Benson Realty


Schlesinger v. Wisconsin

(S. C.) 971 (U. S.) 1224

Constr. Corp. v.

Sullivan, McCullough v.


(Va.) 1100 (N. J.) 928

Scott, Terre Haute, I. & E.

Superior Ct., Hamblin v.

(Cal.) 1509

Traction Co. v.

(Ind.) 1029

Second Judicial Dist. Ct., State


ex rel.


[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]


(Md., 131 Atl. 332.)

depriving corporation of defense of usury

1. A corporation is not unconstitutionally deprived of the equal protection of the laws by a statute depriving it of the defense of usury which

is accorded to individual borrowers.

[See annotation on this question beginning on page 18.]


Estoppel, § 68 corporations stockholder guarantor right to claim individual rights.

2. A stockholder who becomes a guarantor for the obligation of the corporation will not ordinarily be heard to deny this status, and claim that a contract made in the name of the corporation, and within its competency, and as its corporate act, was not a corporate, but his own individual, act, because the corporation had ceased to exist, for the reason that he was, at the time of the apparent corporate act, the sole owner of the corporate stock.

Corporations, § 16 when corporate form disregarded.

3. The rule that the form of a corporate entity may be disregarded where the ownership of all of its cor43 A.L.R.-1.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
« PreviousContinue »