M. (Ga.) 1059 (Tenn.) 742 (Conn.) 952 742 (Tenn.) Co., (W. Va.) L. Lagerquist v. Bankers' Bond & Mortg. Guaranty Co. 330 (Iowa) 585 (Wis.) 622 (Okla.) 803 Langen v. Borkowski Lawley v. Richardson L. D. Pearson & Son v. Bonnie (Ky.) 1166 Leahy, Spring v. (Mass.) 1203 Lehigh & W.-B. Coal Co. v. Globe & R. F. Ins. Co. (C. C. A.) 215 Leicht-Benson Realty & Constr. Corp. v. J. D. Stone & Co. (Va.) 1100 v. Stone (J. D.) & Co. (Va.) 1100 Levy (Nat) & Co., Heineman (Oscar) Corp. V. (C. C. A.) 727 Liebhauser v. Milwaukee Electric R. & Light Co. (Wis.) 870 Longbotham v. Takeoka ... (Or.) 1285 Louisville Trust Co., Silcott v. (Ky.) 28 Lynchburg, Lynchburg Trac- 752 McCullough v. Sullivan .... (N. J.) Wills & Co. ....... (N. Y.) 956 v. Wills (Hamilton B.) & Co.. McKnight v. Brozich 928 (N. Y.) 956 (Minn.) 1352 Minister of Finance, Smith v. .. N. Mitchell Mfg. Co., Portsmouth V. (Ariz.) 1359 (Ark.) 114 (Iowa) 567 0. (Ohio) 961 (Fla.) 1127 (Okla.) 934 (S. C.) 1212 Moore v. Stevens Morgan, Thomas v. Moragne, Carr v. Morrison, Hattiesburg Auto Sales Co. v. .... (Miss.) 147 Mullings, Dickson v. (Utah) Mutual Tank Line Co. v. Gunderson (S. D.) 136 ..... Newcomer v. Sibon Noble v. Noble Norfolk & W. R. Co., Angiline (W. Va.) (Wis.) (Md.) (Wis.) 870 V. Norris, Steber v. P. V. Northern P. R. Co. v. Spokane Valley Growers' Union 79 186 (Can.) 794 862 Nat Levy & Co., Oscar Heineman Corp. v. (C. C. A.) Nebraska Bldg. & Invest. Co., Furrer v. ... (Neb.) Nenzel v. Second Judicial Dist. Ct. ... Newark F. Ins. Co. v. Turk (C. C. A.) 496 (Kan.) 1387 (Cal.) 1235 (Nev.) 1331 862 Paccos v. Rosenthal .... (Wash.) Pearson (L. D.) & Son v. Bonnie 397 727 225 34 501 (Md.) 819 Osborne, Tighe v. 206 (Wash.) 194 142 (Ky.) 1166 AMERICAN ANNOTATED VOL. 43 ANTONIO T. CAROZZA et al., Appts., V. FEDERAL FINANCE & CREDIT COMPANY et al. December 9, 1925. Maryland Court of Appeals Md. Constitutional law, § 311 - depriving corporation of defense of usury validity. Estoppel, § 68 - corporations a stockholder guarantor claim individual rights. 2. A stockholder who becomes guarantor for the obligation of the corporation will not ordinarily be heard to deny this status, and claim that a contract made in the name of the corporation, and within its competency, and as its corporate act, was not a corporate, but his own individual, act, because the corporation had ceased to exist, for the reason that he was, at the time of the apparent corporate act, the sole owner of the corporate stock. 1. A corporation is not unconstitutionally deprived of the equal protection of the laws by a statute depriving it of the defense of usury which is accorded to individual borrowers. [See annotation on this question beginning on page 18.] -- right to Corporations, § 16 when corporate form disregarded. 3. The rule that the form of a corporate entity may be disregarded where the ownership of all of its cor43 A.L.R.-1. 131 Atl. 332.) |