 ... are concerned, I think they stand on quite a different footing than other offenses. In such cases the law is especially sensitive to demands for that procedural fairness which inheres in a civilian trial where the judge and trier of fact are not responsive...  Who is on Trial?: Conflicts Between the Federal and State Judicial Systems ... - Page 109by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations. Government Information, Justice, and Agriculture Subcommittee - 1988 - 197 pagesFull view - About this book
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1958 - 506 pages
...judge and trier of fact are not responsive to the command of the convening authority. I do not cencede that whatever process is "due" an offender faced with...capital case. The distinction is by no means novel, compare Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45, with Betts v. Brady, 316 US 455; nor is it negligible, being... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Civil-military relations - 1958 - 502 pages
...judge and trier of fact are not responsive to the command of the convening authority. I do not cencede that whatever process is "due" an offender faced with...capital case. The distinction is by no means novel, compare Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45, with Betts v. Brady, 316 US 455; nor is it negligible, being... | |
 | J.G. Murphy - Law - 1979 - 280 pages
...Also United States v. Carroll Towing Co. (2 Cir. 1947) 159 F. 2d 169. 56 Mr. Justice Harlan wrote: "I do not concede that whatever process is 'due' an...requirements of the Constitution in a capital case" (Reid v. Covert, 354 US 1) (1957). 57 See Erving Goffmsm, Asylums (New York: Doubleday, 1961). See... | |
| |
