Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona, Volume 2Bancroft-Whitney Company {etc.}, 1904 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 63
Page 3
... prove that death ensued from the wound given deceased by defendant , they must acquit . " This was refused , but no reason given as to why it was refused . The attorney general insists that as there is no bill of exceptions , and ...
... prove that death ensued from the wound given deceased by defendant , they must acquit . " This was refused , but no reason given as to why it was refused . The attorney general insists that as there is no bill of exceptions , and ...
Page 22
... proved . 3. " The court erred in admitting in evidence the assign- ment made by Lord & Williams Company to plaintiff Cul- lum against defendant's objection . " The record shows no error in this . The assignment was a part of plaintiff's ...
... proved . 3. " The court erred in admitting in evidence the assign- ment made by Lord & Williams Company to plaintiff Cul- lum against defendant's objection . " The record shows no error in this . The assignment was a part of plaintiff's ...
Page 29
... authenticated returns correct method of proving facts shown by returns . 5. APPEAL AND ERROR - INSTRUCTIONS - CHARGE ΤΟ JURY ΤΟ BE CONSIDERED AS A WHOLE . - In the review of Oct. 1885. ] 29 UNITED STATES v . TENNEY .
... authenticated returns correct method of proving facts shown by returns . 5. APPEAL AND ERROR - INSTRUCTIONS - CHARGE ΤΟ JURY ΤΟ BE CONSIDERED AS A WHOLE . - In the review of Oct. 1885. ] 29 UNITED STATES v . TENNEY .
Page 31
... our judgment could not in any way even tend to prove a marriage within this territory after the passage of the act creating the offense . We submit • that Congress at the time of the passage of Oct. 1885. ] 31 UNITED STATES v . TENNEY .
... our judgment could not in any way even tend to prove a marriage within this territory after the passage of the act creating the offense . We submit • that Congress at the time of the passage of Oct. 1885. ] 31 UNITED STATES v . TENNEY .
Page 32
... prove the offense , it is but a reasonable presumption that congress intended that the offense should be proved by the general rules of evidence , according to the common law , except so far as lim- ited by the United States statutes ...
... prove the offense , it is but a reasonable presumption that congress intended that the offense should be proved by the general rules of evidence , according to the common law , except so far as lim- ited by the United States statutes ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission affidavit affirmed alleged Appellee application assignment bank Barnes cause certificate Chap charge Charouleau cited Civil cohabitation Comp Compiled Laws complaint concur Congress contract conveyance County of Cochise County of Pima court of equity creditors CRIMINAL deed Defendant and Appellant District Court duty Edmunds Act equity error evidence facts fendant filed findings fraud fraudulent Fraudulent Conveyances husband indictment indorsement irrigation issue judge judgment Judicial District jury land LAWS ARIZ Lord & Williams marriage ment mining claims Mohave County mortgage motion negligence opinion party patent payment person Pima county plaintiff polygamy Porter possession proof question quiet title reason refused rule San Pedro river Santa Cruz river separate property statute supra supreme court taxation term territory of Arizona testimony thereof tion transcript trial United verdict warrant wife Williams Company Woffenden writ writ of assistance
Popular passages
Page 52 - State, and at the expense of the United States, be arrested and imprisoned, or bailed, as the case may be, for trial before such court of the United States...
Page 207 - That the constitution and all laws of the United States which are not locally inapplicable, shall have the s*ame force and effect within the said territory of Nebraska as elsewhere within the United States...
Page 124 - That any contract of exemption 'is to be rigidly scrutinized, and never permitted to extend, either in scope or duration, beyond what the terms of the concession clearly require.' And that such exemptions are regarded 'as in derogation of the sovereign authority and of common right, and therefore not to be extended beyond the exact and express requirement of the grants construed strictlssimi juris.
Page 49 - That all Acts and parts of Acts, so far as they conflict with the provisions of this Act, are hereby repealed...
Page 253 - The writ of mandamus may be denominated the writ of mandate.— 1873-345. 1085. It may be issued by any court, except a justice's or police court, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station...
Page 482 - with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues, and profits thereof.
Page 233 - This case, therefore, treats it rather as an admission of a fact than as a contract, and the case decides that the statute of limitations begins to run from the date of the last item of the account.
Page 184 - In considering the rights and obligations arising out of particular relations, it is competent for courts of justice to regard considerations of policy and general convenience, and to draw from them such rules as will, in their practical application, best promote the safety and security of all parties concerned.
Page 176 - The court shall, in every stage of an action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which shall not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party, and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.
Page 106 - ... accident or surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against...