General Oversight on Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Systems: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session, on General Oversight, April 9, 1979
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 - Copyright - 261 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action additional administrative agency agree agreement amended appear application Artist ASCAP Association authority bill Bros cable Chairman changes claims Columbia Commissioners Committee complaint compulsory license concerning Congress considered copies Copyright Act Copyright Office copyright owners Copyright Royalty Tribunal cost counsel Court decision Defendants DESIGNER determination distribution effect established examination Federal fees filed final follows functions further Government granted hearing House industry interest involved issue jukebox operators KASTENMEIER legislative limited location lists Love material matter meeting motion necessary notice parties patent payment performance person phonorecord players plaintiffs present procedures proceedings proposed public broadcasting published question reasonable received record Redbook Register regulations representatives request responsibilities result revision rule Senate specific statement statute statutory submitted television tion Trademark Tribunal's United Warner Bros York
Page 217 - The economic philosophy behind the clause empowering Congress to grant patents and copyrights is the conviction that encouragement of individual effort by personal gain is the best way to advance public welfare through the talents of authors and inventors in "Science and useful Arts.
Page 84 - Defendant admits the allegation contained in paragraphs 1 and 4 of the complaint; alleges that he is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 2 of the complaint; and denies each and every other allegation contained in the complaint.
Page 75 - When rules are required by statute to be made on the record after opportunity for an agency hearing, sections 556 and 557 of this title apply instead of this subsection.
Page 178 - The purpose of this Act is to provide certain safeguards for an individual against an invasion of personal privacy by requiring Federal agencies, except as otherwise provided by law, to— (1) permit an individual to determine what records pertaining to him are collected, maintained, used, or disseminated by such agencies...
Page 33 - ... term enduring for the author's life . plus an additional 50 years after the author's death In the case of "a joint work prepared by two or more authors who did not work for hire...
Page 42 - The problem of off-the-air taping for nonprofit classroom use of copyrighted audiovisual works incorporated in radio and television broadcasts has proved to be difficult to resolve. The Committee believes that the fair use doctrine has some limited application in this area, but it appears that the development of detailed guidelines will require a more thorough exploration than has so far been possible of the needs and problems of a number of different interests affected, and of the various legal...
Page 72 - The notice shall include (1) a statement of the time, place, and nature of public rule making proceedings; (2) reference to the legal authority under which the rule is proposed; and (3) either the terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and issues involved.
Page 73 - If a pleading is not signed or is signed with intent to defeat the purpose of this rule, it may be stricken as sham and false and the action may proceed as though the pleading had not been served. For a wilful violation of this rule an attorney may be subjected to appropriate disciplinary action. Similar action may be taken if scandalous or indecent matter is inserted.
Page 73 - The signature of an attorney constitutes a certificate by him that he has read the document; that to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support it; and that it is not interposed for delay. If a document is not signed or is signed with intent to defeat the purpose of this section, it may be stricken as sham and false and the matter may proceed as though the document had not been filed.