| United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1980 - 790 pages
...This longstanding and consistent administrative interpretation is entitled to considerable weight. "When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...agency charged with its administration. 'To sustain [an agency's] application of [a] statutory term, we need not find that its construction is the only... | |
| United States. Customs Court - Customs administration - 1970 - 1152 pages
...1959 (1940). As stated by the Supreme Court in Udall v. Tollman, 380 US 1, 16, 85 S. Ct. 792 (1965), "[w]hen faced with a problem of statutory construction,...officers or agency charged with its administration." In the Udall v. Tall/man case the Supreme Court quoted from Unemployment Commission v. Aragon, 329... | |
| United States. Customs Court - Customs administration - 1972 - 572 pages
...very large number of cases that need not be cited. More recently, the Supreme Court has declared that "[w]hen faced with a problem of statutory construction,...statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration.1' Vdall v. Tollman et al., 380 US 1, 16, 85 S.Ct 792 (1965). Accordingly, the courts... | |
| United States. Customs Court - Customs administration - 1973 - 642 pages
...law, it may be noted that the courts have shown great deference, in matters of statutory construction, to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration. Udall v. Tollman, 380 US 1, 85 S. Ct. 792 (1965) ; John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States, 69 Gust.... | |
| United States. Department of the Interior - Natural resources - 1974 - 1004 pages
...the effect of • statute or regulation, they are nevertheless to be accorded "great deference [as] the Interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with Its administration." Udall V. Tallman, 380 US 1, 16 (1965). (ON RECONSIDERATION) August S, 1973 meant to make clear that... | |
| United States. Department of the Interior - Natural resources - 1979 - 672 pages
...definition. In the above-cited Order, the Board cited Udall v. Tollman, 380 US 1 (1965), to the effect that: When faced with a problem of statutory construction, this Court shows great 266-867—78 2 deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged... | |
| United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - Law reports, digests, etc - 1963 - 954 pages
...responsibility of implementing a particular statute, as the CSC was given for the statute now at issue, this court shows great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the agency. Udall v. Tallman, 380 US 1, 16 (1965); Barrington Manor Apartment Corp. v. United States, 198... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1966 - 868 pages
...Interpretation before n», we show "great deference to the Interpretation given the Htatute by the offleere or agency charged with Its administration. 'To sustain...Commission's application of this statutory term, we need not flnd that its construction is the ouly геамтаЫг one, or even thnt it is the result we would... | |
| United States. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Customs Service - Customs administration - 1979 - 1312 pages
...This longstanding and consistent administrative interpretation is entitled to considerable weight. "When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...agency charged with its administration. 'To sustain [an agency's] application of [a] statutory term, we need not find that its construction is the only... | |
| |