 The light in which we are disposed to consider this question is that after a dissolution of a partnership, no partner can create a cause of action against the other partners, except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly...  Reports of Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania - Page 139by Charles Bingham Penrose, Pennsylvania. Supreme Court, Frederick Watts, William Rawle - 1830Full view - About this book
 | Richard Peters - Law reports, digests, etc - 1860 - 836 pages
...action against the other partners by acknowledging a debt, except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what is the consideration to raise euch cause of action ; whether it be a supposed pre-existing debt of the partnership, or any... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - Evidence (Law) - 1876 - 762 pages
...partner can create acause of action against the other partners, except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what...consideration which is to raise such cause of action, — whetheritbe asupposed pre-existing debt of the partnership, or any auxiliary consideration which... | |
 | John Collyer - Partnership - 1878 - 892 pages
...can create a cause of action against the other partners, except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what...debt, the cause of action against the partnership has gone. The acknowledgment, if it is to operate at all, is to create a new cause of action ; to revive... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - Law reports, digests, etc - 1879 - 886 pages
...partner can create a cause of action against the other partners except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what...Unless adopted by them they are not bound by it." Tate v. Clements. The case in which these observations occur was one in which the statute of limitations... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - Limitation of actions - 1882 - 990 pages
...can create a cause of action against the other partners, except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what is the consideration which is to raise snch cause of action, whether it be a supposed pre-existing debt of the partnership or any auxiliary... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1882 - 1074 pages
...action against the other partners, except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. [373] When the statute of limitations has once run against a debt, the cause of action agalnbt the partnership is gone. [373] THIS was a writ of error to the Seventh Circuit Court of the... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1888 - 890 pages
...can create a cause of action against the other partners, except by a new authority, communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what...partnership, or any auxiliary consideration which might prove bénéficiai to them. Unless adopted by them they are not bound by it. When the statute of limitations... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1888 - 942 pages
...can create a cause of action against the other partners, except by a new authority, communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what...which is to raise such cause of action; whether it be supposed a pre-existing debt of the partnership, or any auxiliary consideration, which might prove... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 952 pages
...partner cnn create a cause of action against the other partners except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what...Unless adopted by them, they are not bound by it." The partnershipof Payne & Co. was dissolved and ceased to exist as such before banking hours on the... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 1110 pages
...partner can create a cause of action against the other partners except by a new authority communicated to him for that purpose. It is wholly immaterial what...unless adopted by them, they are not bound by it." 1 Pet.. 352. See, also, Woodfwd v. Dorwin, 3 Vt., 82, and Long v. Story, 10 Mo., 636. In this last... | |
| |
