Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

Conway et al., Knarr V................257

Cowles et al. v. Cullen................279 Abbott et al, Rogers V....... 138 Cox, The Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Allen v. Sharpe et al.......... 67

Co. V.....

•325 Allen, Hall V......... -541 Crawford et al., Whitehall V.........

.147 Armstrong, DeArmond V.............. 35 Crawford, Heller, Receiver, V.........

..279 Crosby et al. v. Jeroloman.. ..264 B

Cullen, Cowles et al. V..................279

Basye v. Goodman.....

331

D Barnes v. Loyd et al...

.141

-523 Baxter v. Kitch, Adm'r.... -554 Davidson, McNiel et al. v......... ·336 Beeson et al., Test et al. V............ .380 Davis et al., Wilson et al. V....... Bell, Streight v.......

:550 DeArmond v. Armstrong... 35 Board of Comm’rs of Marion Co., Delano et al., The State, ex rel. Wallace V......... :383 Childers, V....

.. 249 Board of Comm’rs of Ripley Co., Denman v. McMahin, Adm'r........241 Foy et al. V........

-347 Dinwiddie et al. v. The Pres., etc., Board of Comm’rs of Vanderburg Rushville et al...........

66 Co., Robinson V........

-333 Boyer et al., Kellenberger v.... 188

E Branson, Moreau et ux. v. .195 Brown et al. v. Porter........ .206 Ellis et al., Carr v...... ..........465 Bush v. Bush...........

.164 Erdelmeyer, Treasurer, et al., Root v.225 Eudaly v. Eudaly.....

..440 с

Evans et al., Smith v...

Evans, The City of Evansville et Carr v. Ellis et al......... .465

al. V......

.........229 Cary, The Toledo, etc., R. W. Co. 7.172 Evansville, City of, et al. v. Evans..229 Chandler, by Moore, Guardian, Cheney.....

•391

F
Cheek et al. v. The State...... .533
Cheney, Chandler, by Moore, Guar- Farneman, Treasurer, McNiel et
dian, V..........

.391
al. y.........

........203 Chicago, etc., R. R. Co. v. West...211 Ferrenburg et al. v. The StudabaCity of Columbus et al. v. The Co- ker Turnpike Co. et al...............251

lumbus, etc., R. R. Co............. 294 Fishburn v. Jones........ ..........119 City of Evansville et al. v. Evans..229 Flinn, Jenkins, Assignee, V.......... 349 Coghill v. The State....... ........III Forgey et al. v. The Northern GrayCollins, McKernan v... ....376 el Road Co. et al....................118 Columbus, City of, et al. v. The Co- Foy et al. v. The B'd of Comm’rs of

lumbus, etc., R. R. Co.............294 Ripley Co............. ..........347 Conner v. Wall.......

.252 Frank, Younglove et al. v............ 543

-526

.220

Frenzel et al. v. Miller........

K

G

Kellenberger v. Boyer et al........... 188

Kemp et al., Rittenhouse V...........258

Gaff et al. v. Garnier et al............229 Kessinger et al. v. Kessinger et al.341

Kennedy v. The State.................355

Garr et al., Gorden V.......................

.463
Gavisk et al. v. McKeever.. -484

King et al. v. Marsh....... -389
Kitch, Adm'r, Baxter V................

:554
Geisel v. Taylor et al..
Goldthwait, Adm'r, Miller, Ex’r, v.217 Knight et al. v. McDonald et al.....463

-390 Knarr v. Conway et al...............257

Goodman, Basye V....... ..331

Gorden v. Garr et al....... -463

Graff, Veit et al. v.......

.253

L

Grass v. Hess et al...

.193

Lacey et al. v. Marnan........ .168
Leary, Noble v............

... 186
H
Lee v. Pile......

...107

Liston, Waggoner et al. V..... .357

Hall v. Allen........
.541 Loeb et al. v. Mathis...

-306
Hamlyn et ux. v. Nesbit, Adm'r.....284 Long, Nesbit v....

- 300

Hauser v. Roth et al.............. 89 Loyd et al., Barnes V........ .523

Hayes et al. v. West et al............ 21 Lytle v. Lytle et al.......... ...281

Heaton, The Michigan, etc., R. R.

Co. V......

......448

M

Heizer v. Yohn et al...................415

Heller, Receiver, v. Crawford........279 Madison, etc., R. R. Co. v. 'Taffe... 361

Hess et al., Grass v...

•193 Marion T'p, etc., Co. et al. v. Norris

Holland, Schofield v..

et al.......

...........424

Holler v. The State.....

57 | Marks, Treas. of Tippecanoe Co., V.

Hoskins v. Hutchings et al...... ..324

The Trustees of Purdue Univer-

Hotchkiss v. Olmstead..... .......... 74

Hudson, The State, ex rel. Combs, v..198 Marnan, Lacey et al. V.........

sity......

155

...168

Hughes v. Hughes....

.183 Marsh, King et al. v...........

·389

Hunter v. Thomas....

.145 Mathers v. Scott.....

•303

Hutchings et al., Hoskins ......324 Mathis, Loeb et al. v...

-306
Hyland v. The Water works Co. of

McCabe et al., Johnson V............535

Indianapolis et al............... •523 McDonald et al., Knight et al. v...463

McGinnis, Wright v...... 421

I

McKeever, Gavisk et al. v............484

McKernan v. Collins.........

Indianapolis, etc., R. R. Co. v. The McMahin, Adm'r, Denman V........241

State, ex rel. the City of Law McNiel et al, v. Davidson......

renceburg

...........489 | McNiel et al. v. Farneman, Treas.

Irons, Shirts v ...........

98

........... 203

Messick, Winterrowd et al. v........122

J

Michigan, etc., R. R. Co. v. Hea-

..........448

Miller v. The State
Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Cox.325 Miller, Ex’r,

v. Goldthwait, Adm’r.217

.........432
Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v.

Miller, Frenzel et al. V......
O'Connor

95

Moreau, et ux. v. Branson............195

Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v.

Ross.....

.487

Myers, Unversaw V.............

..545

Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v.

N

Tull

· 341

Jenkins, Assignee, v. Flinn..... -349 Nesbit v. Long.....

• 300

Jeroloman, Crosby et al. v.. .264 Nesbit, Adm'r, Hamlyn et ux. V... 284

Johnson v. McCabe et al.. -535 Nixon et al., Sherman V...............153

Jones, Fishburn V.......... .....119 Noble v. Leary.

......186

Jones, The State V.......... ..179 Norris et al., The Marion Tp., etc.,

Co. et al. v..

..424

I

...505

Northern Gravel Road Co. et al., State, Cheek et al. v............ .533

Forgey et al. V....................118 State, Coghill V............ ..III Nutzenholster et al. v. The State, State, ex rel. Childers, v. Delano ex rel. Sumner et al..................457 et al...............

...249 State, ex rel. City of Lawrenceburg, 0

The Ind’polis, etc., R. R. Co. v..489

State, ex rel. Combs, v. Hudson ...198 O'Connor, The Jeffersonville, etc., State, ex rel. Ellis, Reeves V...........

...441 R. R. Co. V.....

95 State, ex rel. Nix, Wade v.... ...180 Olmstead, Hotchkiss V............... 74 State, ex rel. Sumner et al., Nutzen

holster et al. v........... ...457 P State, Holler v.......

57 State, Kennedy v...

...355 Parmlee et al. v. Sloan et al.........469 State, Miller v......

..432 Pefferman et al., Rettig v........ ..240 State, Taulman v.....

.353 Perkins et al. v. Wright.... 27 State, Urton et al. v......... •339 Pile, Lee V.......

107 St. Palais et al., Schipper V........... Porter, Brown et al. V.................206 Streight v. Bell......

.550 Pottorff et al., Wyant et al. v........512 Studabaker Turnpike Co. et al., FerPres., etc., Rushville et al., Dinwid. renburg et al. V......

....251 die et al. V......

66 Proctor, Ex parte.................. .174

T
Purdue University, Trustees of,
Marks, Treasurer of Tippecanoe

Taffe, The Madison, etc., R. R. Co., v..

..........155
Co. V..........

.......... 361 Taulman v. The State.... ...353 R

Taylor et al., Geisel v...... ...390

Test et al. v. Beeson et al...... --380 Reeves v. The State, ex rel. Ellis...441 Thomas, Hunter V........ ..145 Reinskopf et al. v. Rogge et al...... 207 Tobias, Adm'r, Williams V...........345 Rettig v. Pefferman et al.............. 240 Toledo, etc., R. W. Co. v. Cary.....172 Rittenhouse v. Kemp et al............258 Truitt et ux. v. Truitt.....

•514 Robinson v. The B'd of Comm'rs

Trustees of Purdue University, of Vanderburg Co................. 333 Marks, Treasurer of Tippecanoe Rogge et al., Reinskopf et al. v..... 207 Co., V.......

............ 155 Rogers v. Abbott et al.................138 Tull, The. Jeffersonville, etc., R. Root v. Erdelmeyer, Treas., et al... 225 R. Co. V.....

.341 Ross, The Jeffersonville, etc., R. R. Co. v.

-545

U
Roth et al., Hauser V................... 89
Rushville, The Pres., etc., et al.,
Dinwiddie et al. v.....

..487 66

Unversaw v. Myers..........
Urton et al. y. The State....

...339 S

..153

Schellhaus, Adm'x, Schnantz v...... 85
Schipper v. St. Palais et al....... -505

Veit et al. v. Graff.....

..253 Schnantz v. Schellhaus, Adm’x....... 85 Voltz, Ex parte.......

.175 Schofield v. Holland........ ........220 Voltz, Ex parte.....

..237 Scott, Mathers V........... •303 Sharpe et al., Allen ............. 67

W
Sherman y. Nixon et al...........
Shirts v. Irons......

98 Wade v. The State, ex rel. Nix...... So Shoemaker, Aud. of State, et al. v. Waggoner et al. v. Liston............ 357 Smith et al.......

122 Wall, Conner V........... .......252 Sloan et al., Parmlee et al. V.........

.469 Wallace v. The B'd of Comm’rs Smith v. Evans et al....... .526 of Marion Co........... .........383 Smith et al., Shoemaker, Aud. of Water Works Co. of Ind’polis et al., State, et al. V............

Hyland v...

.523 State v. Jones......

...179 | West et al., Hayes et al. v........... 21

122

West, The Chicago, etc., R. R. Wright, Perkins et al. V.............. 27 Co. V.......

...........211 Wyant et al. v. Pottorff et al......... 512 Whitehall v. Crawford et al.......... 147 Williams v. Tobias, Adm'r.. .345

Y Winterrowd et al. v. Messick...

........ 122 Wilson et al. v. Davis et al...........141 Yohn et al., Heizer V....... .415 Wright v. McGinnis....................421 Younglove et al. v. Frank...... -543

TABLE OF THE CASES

CITED IN THIS VOLUME.

......

A

Bird v. Lanius, 7 Ind. 615............441

Black v. Hersch, 18 Ind. 342........458 Abbott v. Mackinley, 2 Miles, 220..352 Blain v. Bailey, 25 Ind. 165.........113 Abdil v. Abdil, 33 Ind. 460........... 469 Blair v. Bass, 4 Blackf. 539..........482 Abrams v. Smith, 8 Blackf. 95...... 80 Blair v. Williams, 7 Blackf. 132.... III Adams v. Dale, 29 Ind. 273... 8 Blandy v. Griffith, 3 Fisher Pat. Ainslie v. Medlycott, 9 Ves. 13...... 12

Cas. 6o9.........

-539 Albaugh v. James, 29 Ind. 398......426 Blaney v. Findley, 2 Blackf. 338.... 146 Allen v. Davison, 16 Ind. 416.. ..519 Blizzard v. Phebus, 35 Ind. 284.......95 Am. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pringle, 2 B'd of Comm’rs of Lagrange Co. v. Serg. & R. 138........

..192 Cutler, 7 Ind. 6......................520 Ames v. Norman, 4 Sneed, 683......400 B'd of Comm’rs of Lagrange Co. v. Amsbey v. Hinds, 46 Barb. 622..... 98 Kromer, 8 Ind. 446................441 Andrews v. Smith, 2 Cromp., M. Board of Comm'rs of Parke Co. v. & R. 626........

.........271 Lease, 22 Ird. 261...................206 Arnold v. Arnold, 30 Ind. 305......413 Bosley v. Farquar, 2 Blackf. 61......481 Ashing v, Miles, 16 Ind. 329.........291 Bosseker v. Cramer, 18 Ind. 44...... 358

Bowen v. Lease, 5 Hill, N. Y. 221..113 B

Bowen v. Spears, 20 Ind. 146....... 291

Brady v. Richardson, 18 Ind. I..... 301 Bancroft v. Ashhurst, 2 Grant Pa. Brickley v. Heilbruner, 7 Ind. 488..194 513 ....

.... 88 Briggs v. School Dis. No. I of the Bank, The, v. Johnson, 9 Ala. 621..261 Town of Erin Prairie, 21 Wis. Bank, The, v. City of New Albany, 348.........

........418 11 Ind. 139.............

........227 Bright v. McCullough, 27 Ind. Barber v. Harris, 15 Wend. 615.....400 223............. Barclay v. Howell's Lessee, 6 Pet. Brown v. Gale, 5 N. H. 416.........402 498....

....236 Brownfield v. Weicht, 9 Ind. 394.-308 Barker v. Morton, 19 Ind. 146... 205, 254 Bruce v. Schuyler, 4 Gilm. Ill. 221..113 Barnum v. Vandusen, 16 Conn. 200..306 Buckley, Ex parte, in re Clarke, 14 Barton v. Bryant, 2 Ind. 189......... 144 M. & W. 469......... .........273 Baxter v. Bodkin, 25 Ind. 172......556 Burroughs v. Hunt, 13 Ind. 178.... 290 Baxter v. Prickett's Adm'r, 27 Ind. Burrowes v. Lock, 10 Ves. 470...... 16 490 ....

•351, 556 Bush v.

Durham, 15 Ind. 252........ 329 Beard v. Beard, 21 Ind. 321.........284 Butler v. Jaffray, 12 Ind. 504.......145 Beddinger's Adm'r v. Jocelyn, 18 Butt v. The T., W. & W.R. W. Co., Ind. 325............

.301 34 Ind. 162........ ..........373 Bell v. Buckley, 11 Exch. 631...... 70 Button v. Lent, 10 Ind. 365......... 281 Bell v. Daniels, i Fisher Pat. Cas. 372...........

..... 538

с Bellefontaine, etc., R. W. Co. v.

Reed, 33 Ind. 476............252, 550 Cahill v. Vanlaningham, 7 Ind. 540..370 Benner v. Benner, 10 Ind. 256......519 Calkins v. Evans, 5 Ind. 441.........370 Bennett v. Child, 19 Wis. 362.......400 Campbell v. Robbins, 29 Ind. 271..INI Bentley v. Griffin, 5 Taunt. 356......352 Campbell v. The People, 16 IN. 18. 61 Bevins v. Cline's Adm'r, 21 Ind. Carmichael v. Shiel, 21 Ind. 66......80 37.........

..395 Carson v. The State, 27 Ind. 465...420

..133, 162

« PreviousContinue »