Agriculture-environmental and Consumer Protection Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1975, Hearings Before ... 93-2 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
1973 pay raise Abatement and Control activities Administrator air pollution air quality ANDREWS application areas authority budget BURLISON cars Chairman chemical Clean Air Act committee Congress contract control technology disposal economic effects ELKINS emission emission standards energy enforcement engine environment Environmental Financing environmental impact statements Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Quality EPA's evaluation facilities Federal agencies fiscal year 1974 fuel economy full-year cost funds grant guidelines hazardous implementation increase industry information follows initiated Investigative Staff land Man-Years ment million monitoring municipal National noise Noise Control Act October 1973 pay operation percent pesticides PETERSON plans plant PRIORITY problems proposed regional offices regulations request Research and Development resource recovery solid waste sources sulfur oxide tion toxic TRAIN treatment vehicles water pollution Water Pollution Control water quality WHITTEN
Popular passages
Page 196 - erty may be regulated to a certain extent; if regulation goes too far it will be recognized as a taking.” To clarify the taking Issue (and to give the edge to the regulator), the authors recommend: 1. That the Supreme Court overrule the Pennsylvania Coal case and state
Page 172 - radiation protection efforts, this Agency has the unique responsibility to advise the President with respect to radiation matters, directly or indirectly affecting health. including guidance for all Federal agencies in the formulation of radIation standards and in the establishment and execution of programs of cooperation with States. It is
Page 915 - The Administrator is authorized to make grants to any State, municipality, or intermunicipal or Interstate agency for the construction of publicly owned treatment works.” while section 202(a) specifies: “The amount of any grant for treatment works made under this act from
Page 13 - investigation and study of all the technological aspects of achieving, and all aspects of the total economic • social • and environmental effects of achieving or not achieving the effluent limitations and goals set forth for 1983 in section 301(b)(2) of [the] Act.” To accomplish this, the Commission was authorized an appropriation of
Page 529 - emission limitations, schedules, and timetables for compliance with such limitations, and such other measures as may be necessary to Insure attainment and maintenance of such primary or secondary standard, including, but not limited to, land-use and
Page 1 - committee will come to order. We are glad to have with us today Governor Rockefeller of the State of New York and General Clarke, former head of the Corps of Engineers, together with Mr. Smith and Mr. Baker.
Page 526 - In the Federal Reporter or USApp.DC Reports. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
Page 196 - desire to improve the public condition is not enough to war-rant achieving the desire by a shorter cut than the constitutional way of paying for the change.
Page 936 - writing on the environmental impact of any matter relating to his authority as contained in any: (1) legislative proposals by Federal agencies; (2) newly authorized Federal projects for construction and any major Federal agency action (other than a project for construction) to which NEPA applies; and (3) proposed regulations published by any Federal agency. The Act required that such written
Page 341 - Section 105a 2 of Public Law 92—500 authorizes “- - - demonstration projects with respect to new and improved methods of preventing, reducing, storing, collecting, treating, or otherwise eliminating pollution from sewage in rural areas.” Have you funded any of these demonstration projects and if not, why not?