 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1907 - 712 pages
...the Third District, and a further appeal has been prosecuted to this court. At the close of all the evidence the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor, which the court declined to do, and the first reason urged as a ground of reversal... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1884 - 792 pages
...principal facts of the case. On the trial in the common pleas after the plaintiff had rested his case, the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant upon the case made by the plaintiff. This motion was overruled aud refused, and this... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 648 pages
...plaintiff and defendant." The amended answer was withdrawn and refiled. At the close of plaintiff's evidence, the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a • Opinion of the Court. verdict for the defendant on the first cause of action, and at the close... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 666 pages
...foregoing evidence the appellant rested her case. Respondent also rested without offering any evidence, and moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for it upon the following grounds: (1) That appellant had produced no evidence that the respondent had... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 772 pages
...operating an approaching train. Upon substantially the foregoing evidence relating to the accident the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict in its favor on the first cause of action. The court denied the motion and submitted the case,... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - Law reports, digests, etc - 1913 - 676 pages
...the real estate was worth $2650. Upon substantially the foregoing evidence the respondent's counsel moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for respondent, which was done, and this appeal is from the judgment entered upon said verdict. The assignments... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1893 - 2192 pages
...and thereupon the conductor commenced setting* brakes upon the second section. Upon the close of the evidence the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for the company on the grounds that there was no evidence of negligence on part of the defendant, and that,... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1902 - 1128 pages
...the mine. After the evidence had been introduced, and the plaintiff and defendant had both rested, the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, for the reason that the evidence conclusively showed that if there was any negligence... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 2046 pages
...the conclusion of the testimony, the defendant, by its counsel, moved the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, upon the ground that the evidence showed that the deceased 'lost his life by reason of having voluntarily exposed himself to unnecessary... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 2060 pages
...account of sales made by him in his territory. On the evidence so offered, the court Instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, upon the ground that the Judgment In the case of Cramer v. Manufacturing Co. was a bar to the present action. JH Miller and... | |
| |
The cause was submitted to a jury, and after the plaintiffs had submitted their evidence the defendant moved the court to direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, upon the ground that the evidence disclosed the fact that the suit at bar... 
