v. Cleveland, 83 Ohio St. 61 [93 N. E. 467; 21 Ann. Cas.

v. Keefer, 36 O. C. C. 204 (20 N. S. 366; 3 App. 426)

62

v. Miller, 87 Ohio St. 12 [99 N. E. 1078; Ann. Cas. 1913 E

761]

570

v. Orth. 79 Ohio St. 130 [86 N. E. 476; 22 L. R. A. (N. S.)

240]

195

V. Pension Fund, 36 O. C. C. 501 (20 N. S. 13)
v. Philbrick, 69 Ohio St. 283 [69 N. E. 439]

60

62

V.

v. Pohlman, 57 Bull. 411 (13 N. S. 254)

[41 L. R. A. 854]

v. Powell, 58 Ohio St. 324
v. Reding, 87 Ohio St. 388 [101 N. E. 275]
v. Rocker, 130 Iowa 239 [106 N. W. 648]
v. Shumate, 72 Ohio St. 487 [74 N. E. 588]
v. Smith, 69 Ohio St. 196 [68 N. E. 1044]
V.
44 Ohio St. 348 [7 N. E. 447]
v. Sullivan, 81 Ohio St. 79

514; 18 Ann. Cas. 139]

58 Ohio St. 504 [51 N. E. 48; 65 Am. St. 781]
v. Toledo, 48 Ohio St. 112 [26 N. E. 1061; 11 L. R. A. 729]
v. Williams, 35 Mo. App. 541

v. Yates, 66 Ohio St. 546 [64 N. E. 570]

Steel v. Swartz, 55 Ohio St. 685

Steubenville & Wheeling Trac. Co. v. Brandon, 87 Ohio St. 187 [100

587

233

96

197

572

250

570

[90 N. E. 146; 26 L. R. A. (N. S.)

203

281

47

576

571

237

N. E. 325]

..37, 442, 482

Stevens v. Cameron, 100 Tex. 515 [101 S. W. 791]
Stewart v. State, 5 Ohio 242

205

290

Strader v. Mullane, 17 Ohio St. 625

580

Strauch v. Flynn, 108 Minn. 313 [122 N. W. 320; 22 Am. Bankr. 246]

650

St. Joseph & D. C. Ry. v. Dryden, 17 Kan. 278

365

Strong v. Schmidt, 8 Circ. Dec. 551 (15 R. 233)
Summons v. State, 5 Ohio St. 325

Swartz v. Leist, 13 Ohio St. 419

Taylor v. Leith, 26 Ohio St. 428

v. Reynolds, 53 Cal, 686

v. Ross Co. (Comrs.) 23 Ohio St. 22

Tebo v. Baker, 77 N. Y. 33

Thomas v. Railway, 194 Pa. St. 512 [45 Atl. 344]

Thompson v. Judy, 169 Fed. 553 [95 C. C. A. 55; 22 Am. Bankr. 154] 649

v. Winchester, 6 N. Y. 397 [57 Am. Dec. 455]

Thoms v. Greenwood, 6 Dec. Re. 639 (7 Am. L. Rec. 320)
Thorne v. French, 4 Misc. 436 [24 N. Y. Supp. 694]

Page

Toledo v. Hosler, 54 Ohio St. 418 [43 N. E. 583]

47

Toledo & O. C. Ry. v. Fippin, 32 O. C. C. 755 (13 N. S. 125)
Tompkins v. Railway, 66 Cal. 163 [4 Pac. 1165]

481

297

Town of Grove v. Haskell, 24 Okla. 707 [104 Pac. 56]
Townsend v. Townsend, 25 Ohio St. 477

407

73, 449

Trainer v. Porter, 45 Mo. 336

279

Turner v. Car Co. 79 Ohio St. 153 [86 N. E. 651]

Tuttle v. Manufacturing Co. 145 Mass. 169 [13 N. E. 465]

510

Ulhorn, In re, 4 Circ. Dec. 526 (12 R. 765)

204

Union Express Co. v. Graham, 26 Ohio St. 595

229

Union Nat. Bank v. Gill, 81 Ohio St. 515

336

Union Pac. Ry. v. Grain Co. 178 Fed. 223

414

Union Savings Bank & Tr. Co. v. Telegraph Co. 70 Ohio St. 89 [86
N. E. 478; 128 Am. St. 675]

United States v. Peters, 166 Fed. 613 [22 Am. Bankr. 177]

206

649

v. Railway, 84 U. S. (17 Wall.) 322 [21 L. Ed. 597] United States Cement Co. v. Cooper, 172 Ind. 599 [88 N. E. 69]... 577 Ure v. Ure, 185 Ill. 216 [56 N. E. 1087]

46

615

Van Brocklin v. Anderson, 117 U. S. 151 [6 Sup. Ct. 670; 29 L.
Ed. 845]

44

Van Ingen v. Berger, 82 Ohio St. 255 [92 N. E. 433; 19 Ann. Cas. 799]

202

Varner v. Varner, 9 Circ. Dec. 273 (16 R. 386)

349

Wabash Ry. v. Defiance, 52 Ohio St. 262 [40 N. E. 89]
Wadsworth v. Purdy, 31 O. C. C. 110 (12 N. S. 8)

472

214

Walker v. Cincinnati, 21 Ohio St. 14 [8 Am. Rep. 24]

49, 570

v. Torrence, 12 Ga. 604

206

v. Walker, 14 Ohio St. 157 [82 Am. Dec. 474]

564

Walsh v. Insurance Co. 133 N. Y. 408 [31 N. E. 228; 28 Am. St. 651]

276

Ward v. Ward, 10 Circ. Dec. 656 (20 R. 136)

466

Wasson v. Wayne Co. (Comrs.) 49 Ohio St. 622 [32 N. E. 472; 17
L. R. A. 795]

570

Watson v. Cleveland, 21 Conn. 542

615

Weaver v. Carnahan, 37 Ohio St. 363

325

White v. Herndon, 8 Circ. Dec. 292 (15 R. 290)

325

Widoe v. Webb, 20 Ohio St. 435 [5 Am. Rep. 664]

Wilson v. Mason, 158 Ill. 304 [42 N. E. 134; 49 Am. St. 162]

121

Winne v. Winne, 166 N. Y. 263 [59 N. E. 832; 82 Am. St. 647]

238

Witt v. Madigan, 24 Circ. Dec. 263 (2 N. S. 267)

Work v. Corrington, 34 Ohio St. 64 [32 Am. Rep. 345]

387

Wyckoff v. Gardner, 5 Atl. 801 (N. J. Chanc.)

261

Zenor v. Proyor, 57 Ind. App. 222 [106 N. E. 746]

Zumstein v. Coal & Mining Co. 54 Ohio St. 264 [43 N. E. 329]

REPORTS

OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

CIRCUIT AND APPEALS COURTS OF OHIO

COUNTIES INJUNCTION-LEVIES.

[Coshocton (5th) Court of Appeals, March, 1914.]

Powell, Voorhees and Shields, JJ.

MATHEW CRAWFORD V. JOHN I. MILLER, ET AL.

1. County Commissioners May Join with State in Construction of Levy to Protect State Property and County Road from Floods. Under favor of Sec. 7483, G. C., county commissioners have the right to join with state officers in the construction of a levee for the protection of state property from damage from floods, where by so doing they are able to accommodate the public by protecting a county road from overflow and injury.

2. Property Owner Injured by Joint Construction of Levy by State and County has Adequate Remedy against County, Injunction Denied.

A property owner whose lands will probably be damaged by the construction of such a levee has an adequate remedy at law against the county commissioners, who in such a case would be joint tort feasors; hence, injunction does not lie upon the petition of such landowner against proceeding with the work. [Syllabus by the court.]

This action was brought by the plaintiff against the above named defendants, to obtain a temporary restraining order restraining the defendants and each of them from building, erect ing or constructing a levee as described in the petition, until the final hearing of this cause, and upon the final hearing a perpetual injunction be granted as prayed for in the petition.

1 O. C. C. Vol. 37.