Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 78
Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy
Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1882 - Law reports, digests, etc
"With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies).
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action affirmed alleged amended amount answer appear appellant appellant's appellee applied assessed assigned authority averred Bank bond cause charge Circuit Court claim Company complaint consideration constitute contract corporation costs counsel damages debt deed defendant demurrer duty easement entitled error et al evidence exceptions execution facts filed finding firm further give given held instruction intention interest issue John judgment jury justice land liable lien March means ment mortgage motion necessary notice objection opinion overruling owner paid paragraph party payment person plaintiff possession presented proceedings proper provisions purchase question real estate reason received record recover refused rendered reversed rule secure sheriff sold statute street sufficient suit sustained taken term thereof tion town trial trustees verdict witness
Page 314 - The court may also in its discretion allow a party to file his pleadings after the time limited therefor; and shall relieve a party from a judgment taken against him, through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect, and supply an omission in any proceedings on complaint or motion filed within two years.
Page 38 - The shareholders of every national banking association shall be held individually responsible, equally and ratably, and not one for another, for all contracts, debts and engagements of such association, to the extent of the amount of their stock therein, at the par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in such shares...
Page 360 - That nothing in this section shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof...
Page 311 - ... 1. That the court has no jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, or the subject of the action ; or, 2. That the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue ; or, 3. That there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause ; or, 4.
Page 594 - all conveyances and devises of lands, or of any interest therein, made to two or more persons...
Page 358 - ... of which he is justly punishable. He could not plead the punishment by one in bar to a conviction by the other; consequently, this court has decided, in the case of Fox v. The State of Ohio, 5 How. 432, that a...
Page 95 - There is no particular form or ceremony necessary in the dedication of land to public use. All that is required is the assent of the owner of the land, and the fact of its being used for the public purposes intended by the appropriation.
Page 189 - The taking of the note was no extinguishment of the debt due for the rent. It is a rule well settled and repeatedly recognized in this court that taking a note either of the debtor or of a third person for a pre-existing debt is no payment, unless it be expressly agreed to take the note as payment, and to run the risk of its being paid...