Moral Agendas For Children's WelfareMichael King Moral Agendas for Children's Welfare examines the roles played by politics, religion, ethics, aesthetics, law and science in identifying children's needs and rights and critically analyses existing child welfare policies. Five sections cover the following Agendas: * Philosophical and Psychoanalytical * Psychological and Sociological * Religious * Social Policy * Child Protection. Moral Agendas for Children's Welfare will provide invaluable reading for students in law, social work and policy and sociology and professionals in welfare, health care and law. |
Contents
1 Introduction | 1 |
2 Images of children and morality | 12 |
3 Moral campaigns for childrens welfare in the nineteenth century | 25 |
4 Liberalism or distributional justice? | 41 |
5 Can child abuse be defined? | 57 |
6 Is male circumcision morally defensible? | 69 |
7 Meditations on parental love | 81 |
8 Justice and childhood | 92 |
10 With justice in mind | 117 |
11 What is good and bad sex for children? | 136 |
12 Identity religious fundamentalism and childrens welfare | 151 |
13 Failing children | 161 |
175 | |
187 | |
195 | |
9 Moral agendas for psychoanalytic practice with children and families | 105 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action adult anxiety Archard argue argument autonomy become behaviour boundaries capacity carers century challenge Chapter child abuse child protection child sexual abuse child welfare childhood Children Act 1989 children’s rights children’s welfare communitarianism complex concept concern consent construction context courts cultural sensitivity debate decision definition of child dependent Diduck Dingwall discourse distinction Education Act 1996 evil example excluded child fundamentalism fundamentalist harm human idea individual institutions interests interpersonal intervention issue Jenks Jews justice liberal male circumcision masturbation Michael King minority moral agenda moral judgements norms notions NSPCC parents particular persuasive definition Pinchbeck and Hewitt political possible postmodern practice problems professional psychoanalytic psychotherapy pupil question recognized relation relationship religious responsibility seen sense sexual abuse social society special educational needs sphere therapeutic therapist therapy today’s traditional truth understanding vulnerable women wrong young