Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
ABBETT able amendments American American Chemical Society application BAEKELAND believe BRADLEY BRADNER Chairman clients Commissioner of Patents committee competition competitors concern Congress Connery bill cost course court cross-licensing device EWING exclusive right fact field forma pauperis gentleman give Government granted HAWGOOD hearings HOOD idea individual inventor industry infringement instance interest invention issued JOHNSON KRAMER LANGNER large corporations lawyer legislation letters letters patent licensing of patents litigation machine Major ARMSTRONG McFarlane bill ment monopoly O'MALLEY opinion particular patent attorney patent laws Patent Office Patent Office library patent pools patent system PEEBLES percent person pooling practice present profit protection question reason result ROBERTSON royalty sell SIROVICH small manufacturer statement STEFAN STONEBRAKER subcommittee suppressed Thank thing Thomas O'Malley tion TJOFLAT trying United witness ZERK
Popular passages
Page 8 - Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any proceeding under section four of this act may be pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be summoned, whether they reside in the district in which the court is held or not ; and subpoenas to that end may be served in any district by the marshal thereof.
Page 6 - ... patents for new inventions are granted not only to encourage invention but to secure that new inventions shall so far as possible be worked on a commercial scale in the United Kingdom without undue delay.
Page 6 - If the demand for the patented article in Canada, is not being met to an adequate extent and on reasonable terms...
Page 95 - The importation by the patentee into the country where the patent has been granted of articles manufactured in any of the countries of the Union shall not entail...
Page 73 - O'MALLEY. Do you care to express an opinion upon my own measure ? Mr. THORNHILL. I do not believe that I have given that enough thought to express an opinion on your measure, Mr. O'Malley. Mr. O'MALLEY. The committee is pleased to have you here, and on behalf of the committee I want to thank you for your time, and "will you note also that you have an opportunity to file any additional written statement you wish to make before the close of the hearings. Mr. THORNHILL. Thank you very much, Mr. O'Malley....
Page 95 - ... by the patentee into the country where the patent has been granted of articles manufactured in any of the countries of the Union shall not entail forfeiture of the patent.
Page 8 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Page 95 - March 20, 1883, revised at Brussels December 14, 1900, at Washington June 2, 1911, and at The Hague November 6, 1925...
Page 270 - Its object is, as outlined in its charter, "to encourage in the broadest and most liberal manner the advancement of chemistry in all its branches...