of the cases reported during May, June, and July, 1891.
Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case, with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.*
(L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 124; 39 W.R. 574), 16, 76, vii.
Alderson v. Peel, 119, iv.
Allchurch & Parrott v. Hendon Assess-
ment Committee, 130, iii.
Allcock v. Hall (60 L.J. Q.B. 416; 64 L.T. 309; 39 W.R. 443), 16, 93, iii. Alliance Pure White Lead Syndicate v. MacIvor's Patents, 134, ii. Angus v. Clifford, 113, ii. Anna & Bertha, the, 136, iii. Apollinaris Co.'s Trade Marks, re, 142, v.
Arbib & Class, re (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 601; 60 L.J. Ch. 263), 16, 103, v.; 105, vi.
Armour v. Bate, 133, vi.
Ashlin v. Boon (60 L.J. Ch. 306), 16, 80, i.
Asia, the (64 L.T. 327), 16, 99, iii. Askew v. A. (60 L.J. P. 52), 16, 71, i. A..G. v. Logan, 128, iv.
v. Morgan (64 L.T. 403), 16,
79, ii. Avery v. Wood, 116, i.
Aylesford (Earl) v. Poulett (Earl) (64 L.T. 336), 18, 100, vi.
Aylward v. Lewis (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 81; 39 W.R. 552), 16, 92, ii. BANGOR (BISHOP) v. PARRY, 111, iii. Bank of England v. Vagliano (L.R. [1891] A.C. 107; 64 L.T. 353), 16, 74, ii.
Barker, goods of, 146, i.
v. Furlong, 133, ii.; 143, i. Barlow v. Ferrett, 144, i. Barney v. Joshua Stubbs (64 L.T. 306), 16, 76, v.
Beasley v. Roney (60 L.J. Q.B. 408), 16, 86, v.
Beauclerk v. B. (L.R. [1891] P. 189), 16, 81, i.
Beckett v. Tower Assets Co., 110, v. Bell v. Antwerp, &c., Line (60 L.J. Q.B. 270; 64 L.T. 276), 16, 57, vii. Bellamy v. Debenham (64 L.T. 478), 16, 104, v.
Bellencontre, re (L.R. [1891] 2 Q.B. 122; 60 L.J. M.C. 83; 64 L.T. 461), 16, 80, ii.
Bethune v. B. (L.R. [1891] P. 205), 16, 11, v.
Bishop v. Taylor, 144, ii. Blackman v. Fysh, 145, v.
Blyth v. Fladgate (39 W.R. 422), 16, 63, iii.
Board of Trade, e. p. ; re Griffin (60 L.J. Q.B. 235), 16, 37, v.
The cases reported in the Law Times and Weekly Reporter for July 25th, will be included in the November number.
Board of Trade, e. p. ; 109, iv.
Boehm, goods of, 146, ii. Boiler ex Elephant, the, 140, i. Bolton v. Buckenham (60 L.J. Q.B. 261; 64 L.T. 278), 16, 94, v.
v. Salmon (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 48; 39 W.R. 589), 16, 94, vi. Bonnard v. Berryman, 123, i. Bootle-cum-Linacre Corporation v. Lancashire County Council, 124, iii. Bostock v. D'Eyncourt, 145, i. Bound v. Lawrence, 127, i. Bourne v. Wall, 110, vi. Bowers v.
Harding (L.R.[1891] 1 Q.B. 560; 39 W.R. 558), 16, 96, iii. Boydell v. Millar (60 L.J. Q.B. 251; 64 L.T. 298), 16, 94, v. Brace V. Abercarne Colliery Co. (64 L.T. 419), 16, 87, v. Brandon v. McHenry (60 L.J. Q.B. 448), 16, 72, iv.
Brewis v. Hornsey Local Board (64 L.T. 288), 16, 85, ii. Bridgewater
CAMINADA V. HULTON, 119, iii. Carrier v. Price, 111, iv. Carter v. Silber, 125, v. Castioni, re (64 L.T. 344), 16, 45, i. Cawse v. Nottingham Lunatic Hos- pital, 137, iii.
Central Argentine Gold Fields, e. p. ; re Low (60 L.J. Q.B. 265), 16, 37, ii. Charles v. Plymouth Waterworks Mortgagees (64 L.T. 466), 16, 49, iv. Chatenay v. Brazilian Telegraph Co. (60 L.J. Q.B. 295), 16, 42, iv. Cheesman, re, 140, vi. Clarke v. C., 132, vii.
Clink v. Radford (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B.
625; 60 L.J. Q.B. 388; 64 L.T. 491), 16, 98, i.
Cohen v. De Las Rivas, 138, vii. Colman's Trade Mark, re, 142, iii. Comfort v. Betts, 118, ii.
Cooke v. Smith (64 L.T. 484), 16, 91, vi.
Cordova Union Gold Co., re, 114, iv. Cox & Neve, re (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 109), 16, 104, iii.
v. Bennett (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 617; 64 L.T. 380), 16, 86, iv.
v. Paddington Vestry, 128, ii. Coxon v. Gorst, 114, iii. Crawford v. Forshaw, 119, i. Cressington, the (64 L.T. 329), 16, 97, iv.
Crumbie v. Wallsend Local Board (60 L.J. Q.B. 392; 64 L.T. 490), 16, 84, iv.
Cunningham & Frayling's Contract, re, 143, iii.
Curfew, the (60 L.J. P. 53; 64 L.T. 330), 16, 98, iii.
DANIEL V. FERGUSON, 121, ii. Darlington Waggon Co. v. Harding
(64 L.T. 409), 16, 35, iv. Davies & Drummond, re (60 L.J. Ch. 258; 39 W.R. 445), 16, 86, i. Davies, Turner & Co. v. Lowen, 137, ii. Dean v. D., 144, v.
De Mestre v. West, 144, iii.
De Pass v. Capital and Industries Corporation (60 L.J. Q.B. 252), 16, 92, iv.
De Penny v. Christie, 135, iv. De Souza v. Cobden, 124, ii. Dicido Pier Co., re, 113, iv. Dickenson, goods of, 107, ii.
Dillon v. Haverfordwest Corporation (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. 575; 39 W.R. 478), 16, 96, ii.
Dobson v. Festi, 135, ii.
Dowse v. Gorton, 118, vi.
Drew v. Lewis (60 L.J. Q.B. 264), 16, 91, iii.
EAST END BENEFIT BUILDING SOCIETY v. SLACK, 117, iv. Electrical Engineering Co., re, 114, v. Ellis v. Barfield, 142, ii. v. Dadson, 114, ii. Elton, the, 136, i.
Elve v. Boyton (60 L.J. Ch. 383; 64 L.T. 482), 16, 103, ii.
England v. Provincial Assets Co. (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 695; 60 L.J. Ch. 373), 16, 73, vi.
FECITT V. WALSH, 108, i.
Fishburn v. Hollingshead, 116, iii. Fisher v. Jackson, 111, ii.
Fletcher v. Fielding, 127, ii.
Foreign and Colonial Government
Fortescue v. Bethnal Green Vestry, 127, iii.
France v. Dutton, 117, iii. Fraser, goods of, 145, vi. Fuente's Trade Mark, re (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 166; 60 L.J. Ch. 308; 39 W.R. 489), 16, 101, iii.
GEDYE V. COMMISSIONERS OF WORKS, 122, v.
General Service Co-operative Stores, re (64 L.T. 272), 16, 94, iii. Gibbons v. Proctor, 138, iv. Gibbs v. Messer (L.R. [1891] A.C. 248), 16, 75, iv.
Good v. Lickorish, 143, ii. Gough v. G., 142, i.
Liverpool Corporation, 121, iv. Government Stock Investment Co., re (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 649; 64 L.T. 339), 16, 75, v.
Green v. Moore, 136, v. Greenwood v. Turner (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 144; 60 L.J. Ch. 351), 16, 103, vii.
HANLEY, &c., COAL Co. v. NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE RAILWAY Co., 127,
Harding's Settled Estates, re, 138, vi.
Harrison v. Southwark and Vauxhall
Waterworks Co., 128, iii.
Hearson, re, 128, i.
Heinemann v. Hale, 135, iii. Henderson V. Underwriting and Agency Association, 132, iii. Hewett v. Barr (60 L.J. Q.B. 268), 16, 57, vi.
Hildesheimer v. Dunn, 116, iv. Hoare v. Niblett, 115, iv.
Hogarth v. Miller (60 L.J. P.C. 1), 16, 98, v.
Holliday v. Mayor of Wakefield (L.R. [1891] A.C. 81; 60 L.J. Q.B. 361), 16, 105, ii.
Holmes v. H., 111, v.
Hotchin v. Hindmarsh, 107, iv. Howlett v. Mayor of Maidstone, 124, iv.
Hunt v. G.N.R., 123, iv.
v. Newberry, 123, iii. Learoyd v. Brook (60 L.J. Q.B. 373; 64 L.T. 458; 39 W.R. 480), 16, 71, iii. Leavesley, re (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 1; 60 L.J. Ch. 385; 64 L.T. 269), 16, 85, iii.
Levasseur v. Mason & Barry, 133, iv. Lewin v. L., 131, iii.
Little v. London Joint Stock Bank (60 L.J. Ch. 313; 39 W.R. 449), 16, 72, iii.
MACKENZIE V. MACKINTOSH, 141, ii. McMahon v. North Kent Ironworks (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 148; 60 L.J. Ch. 372; 64 L.T. 317), 16, 76, iv.
Madell v. Thomas (60 L.J. Q.B. 227), 16, 74, iv.
Mann, goods of, 107, i.
Margrett, e. p.; re Soltykoff (60 L.J. Q.B. 339), 16, 81, vi. Marianne, the (64 L.T. 539), 16, 99, vi.
Medawar v. Grand Hotel Co., 121, iii. Mercer's Co. v. Eames, 118, iv. Metropolitan Coal Consumers' As- sociation, re; e. p. Edwards, 113, iii.
Metropolitan Railway v. Fowler, 138, ii.
Michell v. M., 120, vi.
Miller v. Dell (60 L.J. Q.B. 404), 16, 47, iv.
Mills v. Dunham, 137, i. Mirams, re (L.R. [1891] Q.B. 594; 60 L.J. Q.B. 397; 39 W.R. 464), 16, 73, v.
Monk v. Bartram (60 L.J. Q.B. 267), 16, 93, iv.
Montgomerie v. United Kingdom Mutual Steamship Association (60 L.J. Q.B. 429; 64 L.T. 323), 16, 82, ii.
Montgomery v. Thompson, 142, iv. Moody v. Penfold (64 L.T. 333), 16, 103, iii.
Moore v. Bull, 120, v.
v. Johnson, 125, iv.
v. Knight (60 L.J. Ch. 271),
NATIONAL DEBENTURE, &c., CORPORA- TION, re (60 L.J. Ch. 248), 16, 76, vi.
re, 113, i. National Wholemeal Bread, &c., Co., re (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 151; 60 L J. Ch. 350; 64 LT. 285), 16, 94, iv. Nevin, re (L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 299), 16, 81, v.
New Pelton, the, 139, iii.
North Lonsdale Iron Co. v. Furness Railway Co. (60 L.J. Q.B. 419), 16, 95, iii.
Nuttall v. Whittaker, 134, v.
PAINE V. CHISHOLM (60 L.J. Q.B. 413), 16, 90, vi.
Parrott, e. p.; re Cullen, 110, iii. Payne-Collier, e. p.; re Taylor, &c., 141, i.
Perry v. Eames, 118, iv. Phelps v. Hill, 139, vii. Phillips v. Holliday, 118, v. Pitman v. Holborrow, 108, iv. Pittard v. Oliver (60 L.J. Q.B. 219), 16, 100, ii.
"Pleiades," Owners of, v. Page, 136, ii. Plomley v. Frost (60 L.J. P.C. 15), 16, 68, vii.
v. Shepherd, 112, iii. Porrett, re, 140, iv.
Price v. Frost (60 L.J. P.C. 15), 16, 68, vii.
Pullman v. Hill (60 L.J. Q.B. 299), 16, 84, i.
Patney Overseers v. L. & S.W.R. (60 L.J. Q.B. 438; 64 L.T. 280), 16, 90, ii.
« PreviousContinue » |