Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

INDEX
of the cases reported during May, June, and July, 1891.

Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding
quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case,
with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first
appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.*

Aas v. BENHAM, 129, iv.
Abrahams v. Deakin (60 L.J. Q.B.

238), 16, 49, vi.
Abstainers, &o., Insurance Co., re

(L.R. (1891] 2 Ch. 124 ; 39 W.R.

574), 16, 76, vii.
Alderson v. Peel, 119, iv.
Allchurch & Parrott v. Hendon Assess.

ment Committee, 130, iii.
Allcock v. Hall (60 L.J. Q.B. 416;

64 L.T. 309; 39 W.R. 443), 16,

93, iii.
Alliance Pure White Lead Syndicate

v. MacIvor's Patents, 134, ii.
Angus v. Clifford, 113, ii.
Anna & Bertha, the, 136, iii.
Apollinaris Co.'s Trade Marks, re,

142, v.
Arbib & Class, re (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.

601 ; 60 L.J. Ch. 263), 16, 103, V.;

105, vi.
Armour v. Bate, 133, vi.
Ashlin v. Boon (60 L.J. Ch. 306),

16, 80, i.
Asia, the (64 L.T. 327), 16, 99, iii.
Askew v. A. (60 L.J. P. 52), 16, 71, i.
A.-G. v. Logan, 128, iv.

v. Morgan (64 L.T. 403), 16,
79, ii.
Avery v. Wood, 116, i.
Aylesford (Earl) v. Poulett (Earl)

(64 L.T. 336), 16, 100, vi.

Aylward v. Lewis (L.R. (1891] 2 Ch.

81; 39 W.R. 552), 16, 92, ii.
BANGOR (BISHOP) v. PARRY, 111, iii.
Bank of England v. Vagliano (L.R.

[1891] A.C. 107; 64 L.T. 353), 16,

74, ii.
Barker, goods of, 146, i.

v. Furlong, 133, ii.; 143, i.
Barlow v. Ferrett, 144, i.
Barney v. Joshua Stubbs (64 L.T.

306), 16, 76, v.
Beasley v. Roney (60 L.J. Q.B. 408),

16, 86, v.
Beauclerk v. B. (L.R. (1891] P. 189),

16, 81, i.
Beckett v. Tower Assets Co., 110, v.
Bell v. Antwerp, &c., Line (60 L.J.

Q.B. 270; 64 L.T. 276), 16, 57, vii.
Bellamy v. Debenham (64 L.T. 478),

16, 104, v.
Bellencontre, re (L.R. (1891] 2 Q.B.

122 ; 60 L.J. M.C. 83 ; 64 L.T.

461), 16, 80, ii.
Bethune v. B. (L.R. (1891] P. 205),

16, 11, v.
Bishop v. Taylor, 144, ii.
Blackman v. Fysh, 145, v.
Blyth v. Fladgate (39 W.R. 422), 16,

63, iii.
Board of Trade, e. p.; re Griffin (60

L.J. Q.B. 235), 16, 37, v.

* The cases reported in the Law Times and Weekly Reporter for July 25th,
will be included in the November pumber.

V.

Board of Trade, e. p. ;

re Wallis, Cooke v. Smith (64 L.T. 484), 16,
109, iv.

91, vi.
Boehm, goods of, 146, ii.

Cordova Union Gold Co., re, 114, iv.
Boiler ex Elephant, the, 140, i.

Cox & Neve, re (L.R. (1891] 2 Ch.
Bolton v. Buckepham (60 L.J. Q.B. 109), 16, 104, iii.
261; 64 L.T. 278), 16, 94, v.

v. Bennett (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.
v. Salmon (L.R. (1891] 2 Ch. 617; 64 L.T. 380), 16, 86, iv.
48; 39 W.R. 589), 16, 94, vi.

v. Paddington Vestry, 128, ii.
Bonnard v. Berryman, 123, i.

Coxon v. Gorst, 114, iii.
Bootle-cum-Linacre Corporation v. Crawford v. Forshaw, 119, i.

Lancashire County Council, 124, iii. Cressington, the (64 L.T. 329), 16,
Bostock v. D'Eyncourt, 145, i.

97, iv.
Bound y. Lawrence, 127, i.

Crombie v. Wallsend Local Board
Bourne v. Wall, 110, vi.

(60 L.J. Q.B. 392; 64 L.T. 490),
Bowers v. Harding (L.R.[1891] 1 Q.B.

16, 84, iv.
560; 39 W.R. 558), 16, 96, iii. Cunningham & Frayling's Contract,
Boydell v. Millar (60 L.J. Q.B. 251 ;

re, 143, iii.
64 L.T. 298), 16, 94, v.

Curfew, the (60 L.J. P. 53; 64 L.T.
Brace Abercarne Colliery Co. 330), 16, 98, ii.

(64 L.T. 419), 16, 87, v.
Brandon v. McHenry (60 L.J. Q.B. DANIEL v. FERGUSON, 121, ii.
448), 16, 72, iv.

Darlington Waggon Co. v. Harding
Brewis v. Hornsey Local Board (64 (64 L.T. 409), 16, 35, iv.
L.T. 288), 16, 85, ii.

Davies & Drummond, re (60 L.J. Ch.
Bridgewater Navigation Co., re, 258; 39 W.R. 445), 16, 86, i.
115, ii.

Davies, Turner & Co. v. Lowen, 137, ii.
Briggs v. Spicer (L.R. (1891] 2 Ch. Dean v. D., 144, v.
127), 16, 104, iv.

De Mestre v. West, 144, iii.
Brighton Guardians v. Strand Guar De Pass v. Capital and Industries
dians, 130, ii.

Corporation (60 L.J. Q.B. 252),
Brown v. Coates, 110, iv.

16, 92, iv.
v. Hawkes, 125, iii.

De Penny v. Christie, 135, iv.
Budd v. Lucas (64 L.T. 292), 16, De Souza v. Cobden, 124, ii.
102, i.

Dicido Pier Co., re, 113, iv.
Burt v. Arnold, 145, iii.

Dickenson, goods of, 107, ii.
v. Gray, 122, iii.

Dillon v. Haverfordwest Corporation

(L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B. 575; 39 W.R.
CAMINADA V. HULTON, 119, iii.

478), 16, 96, ii.
Carrier v. Price, 111, iv.

Dobson v. Festi, 135, ii.
Carter v. Silber, 125, v.

Dowse v. Gorton, 118, vi.
Castioni, re (64 L.T. 344), 16, 45, i. Drew v. Lewis (60 L.J. Q.B. 264),
Cawse v. Nottingham Lunatic Hos-

16, 91, iii.
pital, 137, iii.
Central Argentine Gold Fields, e. p.; East End BENEFIT BUILDING SOCIETY

re Low (60 L.J. Q.B. 265), 16, v. SLACK, 117, iv.
37, ii.

Electrical Engineering Co., re, 114, v.
Charles V. Plymouth Waterworks Ellis v. Barfield, 142, ii.
Mortgagees (64 L.T. 466), 16, ! v. Dadson, 114, ii.
49, iv.

Elton, the, 136, i.
Chatenay v. Brazilian Telegraph Co. Elve v. Boyton (60 L.J. Ch. 383; 64
(60 L.J. Q.B. 295), 16, 42, iv.

L.T. 482), 16, 103, ii.
Cheesinan, re, 140, vi.

England v. Provincial Assets Co.
Clarke v.
C., 132, vii.

(L.R. (1891] 1 Ch. 695; 60 L.J. Ch.
Clink v. Radford (L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B. 373), 16, 73, vi.
625; 60 L.J. Q.B. 388; 64 L.T.
491), 16, 98, i.

FECITT v. WALSH, 108, i.
Cohen v. De Las Rivas, 138, vii. Fishburn v. Hollingshead, 116, iii.
Colman's Trade Mark, re, 142, iii. Fisher v. Jackson, 111, ii.
Comfort v. Betts, 118, ii.

Fletcher v. Fielding, 127, ii,

Foreign and Colonial Government

Trust, re, 112, v.
Fortescue v. Bethnal Green Vestry,

127, iii.
France v. Dutton, 117, iii.
Fraser, goods of, 145, vi.
Fuente's Trade Mark, re (L.R. (1891]

2 Ch. 166 ; 60 L.J. Ch. 308; 39
W.R. 489), 16, 101, iii.

JABLOCHKOFP's PATENT, re, 129, v.
Jenkins v. Bashby (60 L.J. Ch. 254),
16, 93, i.

-, e. p.; re J., 109, iii.
Jenoure v. Delmege (60 L.J. P.C. 11),

16, 84, ii.
John Morley Bailding Society v.

Barras, 112, iv.
Johnstone v. Mappin (60 L.J. Ch. 241),

16, 97, i.
Jones v. Foley, 122, iv.

Macaulay (60 L.J. Q.B. 258;
64 L.T. 621), 16, 55, iii.
Joyce v. Beall (66 L.J. Q.B. 242),

16, 91, vii.
Joyner v. Weeks, 122, ii.

.V.

GEDYE v. COMMISSIONERS OF WORKS,

122, v.
General Service Co-operative Stores,

re (64 L.T. 272), 16, 94, iii.
Gibbons v. Proctor, 138, iv.
Gibbs v. Messer (L.R. [1891] A.C.

248), 16, 75, iv.
Good v. Lickorish, 143, ii.
Gough v. G., 142, i.

Liverpool Corporation, 121, iv.
Government Stock Investment Co.,

re (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch. 649; 64 L.T.

339), 16, 75, v.
Green v. Moore, 136, v.
Greenwood v. Tarner (L.R. (1891)

2 Ch. 144; 60 L.J. Ch. 351), 16,
103, vii.

KENNEDY v. Cowie, 118, i.
Kenrick v. Danube Collieries, &c., Co.,

116, v.
Kent County Council and Councils of

Dover and Sandwich, e. p. (60 L.J.
Q.B. 314 ; 64 L.T. 421), 16,
85, i.

and

e. p., 125, ii.
King's College, Cambridge, e. Po,

112, i.
Knight & Tabernacle Building

Society (Arbitration), re, 111, i.
Knowles v. Scott, 114, i.
Knutsford, the, 136, iv.
Kong Magnus, the (L.R. (1891] P.
223), 16, 61, vi.

-, the, 139, v.
Kutner v. Phillips, 111,

vi.

V.

HANLEY, &c., Coal Co. v. NORTH

STAFFORDSHIRE RAILWAY CO., 127,

iv.
Harding's Settled Estates, re, 138,

vi.
Harrison v. Southwark and Vauxhall

Waterworks Co., 128, iii.
Hearson, re, 128, i.
Heinemann v. Hale, 135, iii.
Henderson Underwriting and

Agency Association, 132, iii.
Hewett v. Barr (60 L.J. Q.B. 268),

16, 57, vi.
Hildesheimer v. Dann, 116, iv.
Hoare v. Niblett, 115, iv.
Hogarth v. Miller (60 L.J. P.C. 1),

16, 98, v.
Holliday v. Mayor of Wakefield (L.R.

[1891] A.C. 81; 60 L.J. Q.B. 361),

16, 105, ii.
Holmes v. H., 111, v.
Hotobin v. Hindmarsh, 107, iv.
Howlett v. Mayor of Maidstone,

124, iv.
Hunt v. G.N.R., 123, iv.

126, iii.

V.

LACON v. L., 144, iv.
Laing v. Walker, 121, i.
Lake's Potent, re, 129, vi.
Lamb v. G.N.R., 126, iv.
Lane v. Esdaile, 131, ii.
Langston v. Glasson, 137, v.
Larkin v. Lloyd, 133, v.
Lawrence v. Edwards (60 L.J. Ch.
336), 16, 79, iv.

129, i.
v. Newberry, 123, iii.
Learoyd v. Brook (60 L.J. Q.B. 373 ;

64 L.T. 458; 39 W.R. 480), 16,

71, iii.
Leavesley, re (L.R. (1891] 2 Ch. 1;

60 L.J. Ch. 385; 64 L.T. 269), 16,

85, iii.
Levasseur v. Mason & Barry, 133, iv.
Lewin v. L., 131, ji.
Little v. London Joint Stock Bank

(60 L.J. Ch. 313; 39 W.R. 449),
16, 72, iii.

INDIGO Co. v. OGILVY, 135, i.
Inland Revenue Commissioners v.

Forrest (60 L.J. Q.B. 281), 16,
22, v.

NATIONAL DEBENTURE, &c., CORPORA-

TION, re (60 L.J. Ch. 248), 16,
76, vi.

V.

London Bank of Mexico v. Apthorpe
(64 L.T. 416), 16, 96, i.

138, i.
L.C. & D.R. v. S.E.R., 122, i.
Louis, re ;

e. p. Incorporated Law
Society, 141, iii.
Lysaght v. Clark, 134, vii.

re, 113, i.
National Wholemeal Bread, &c., Co.,

re (L.R. (1891] 2 Ch. 151; 60 L J.

Ch. 350 ; 64 LT. 285), 18, 9, it.
Nevin, re (L.R. (1891] 2 Ch. 299),

16, 81, v.
Now Pelton, the, 139, iii.
North Lonsdale Iron Co. v. Farness

Railway Co. (60 L.J.Q.B. 419), 16,

95, iii.
Nuttall v. Whittaker, 134, v.
OLDHAM V. SHEASBY, 123, v.
Opera, Limited, re (60 L.J. Ch.
646), 15, 111, v.

-, re, 114, vi.
Oppenheim v. Schweder, 145, iv.
O'Shea v. Wood (L.R. (1891] P. 237;
60 L.J. P. 41), 16, 91, v.

132, vi.

[ocr errors]

MACKENZIE V. MACKINTOSH, 141, ii.
McMahon v. North Kent Ironworks

(L.R. [1891] 2 Ch. 148; 60
L.J. Ch. 372; 64 L.T. 317), 16,
76, iv.
Madell v. Thomas (60 L.J. Q.B. 227),

16, 74, iv.
Mann, goods of, 107, i.
Margrett, e. p.; re Soltykoff (60

L.J. Q.B. 339), 16, 81, vi.
Marianne, the (64' L.T. 539), 16,

99, vi.
Medawar v. Grand Hotel Co., 121, iii.
Mercer's Co. y. Eames, 118, iv.
Metropolitan Coal Consumers' As.

sociation, re; e. p. Edwards, 113,

iii.
Metropolitan Railway v. Fowler,

138, ii.
Michell v. M., 120, vi.
Miller v. Dell (60 L.J. Q.B. 404),

16, 47, iv.
Mills v. Dunham, 137, i.
Mirams, re (L.R. [1891] Q.B. 594 ;
60 L.J. Q.B. 397; 39 W.R. 464),

16, 73, v.
Monk v. Bartram (60 L.J. Q.B. 267),

16, 93, iv.
Montgomerie v. United Kingdom

Mutual Steamship Association
(60 L.J. Q.B. 429; 64 L.T. 323),

16, 82, ii.
Montgomery v. Thompson, 142, iv.
Moody v. Penfold (64 L.T. 333), 16,

103, iii.
Moore v. Bull, 120, v.

v. Johnson, 125, iv.

v. Knight (60 L.J. Ch. 271),
16, 84, v.

North Western Bank,
113, v.

v. Peachey, 132, v.
Moorgom v. Tate, 145, i.
Morgan v. Blyth (39 W.R. 422), 16,

63, iii.
Morris v. Edwards, 132, iv.
Moul v. Groenings, 117, i.
Mundy's Settled Estates, re (60 L.J.

Ch. 273), 18, 60, iv.
Musgrove v.Chung Teong Toy, 108, iii.
Myers v. M., 129, iii.

PainE v. CHISHOLM (60 L.J. Q.B. 413),

16, 90, vi.
Parrott, e. p. ; re Cullen, 110, iii.
Payne-Collier, e. p.; re Taylor, &c.,

141, i.
Perry v. Eames, 118, iv.
Phelps v. Hill, 139, vii.
Phillips v. Holliday, 118, v.
Pitman v. Holborrow, 108, iv.
Pittard v. Oliver (60 L.J. Q.B. 219),

16, 100, ii.
“Pleiades," Owners of, v. Page, 136, ii.
Plomley v. Frost (60 L.J. P.C. 15),
16, 68, vii.

v. Shepherd, 112, iii.
Porrett, re, 140, iv.
Price v. Frost (60 L.J. P.C. 15), 16,

68, vii.
Pallman v. Hill (60 L.J. Q.B. 299),

16, 84, i.
Patney Overseers v. L. & S.W.R.

(60 L.J. Q.B. 438; 64 L.T. 280),
16, 90, ii.

Queen Victoria, the, 139, vi.
Queensland Mercantile, &c., Co., re

(64 L.T. 555; 39 W.R. 447), 16,
77, vi.

RADCLIFFE V. BEWES, 130, iv.
Reeve v. Gibson, 116, ii.
Reg. v. Bank of England, 109, ii.

v. Boiler Commissioners, 110, vii.
v. City of London Judge, 132, ii.

« PreviousContinue »