Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

INDEX
of the cases reported during February, March, and April, 1891.

Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding
quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case,
with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first
appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.

V.

[ocr errors]

ABRAHAMS v. DEAKIN (L.R. (1891]

1 Q.B. 516), 16, 49, vi.
A bstainers, &c., Insurance Co., re,

76, vii.
Accomac, the (63 L.T. 737), 16,

61, iv.
Adams v. Great North of Scotland

Ry. Co., 72, ii.
Agricultural Hotel Co., re (L.R. (1891]

1 Ch. 396 ; 60 L.J. Ch. 208; 63 L.T.

748), 16, 41, v.
Alabama, &c., Ry. Co., re (60 L.J.
Ch. 77), 16, 42, i.

, re, 77, i.
Alden v. Beckley (60 L.J. Q.B. 87),

16, 57, iii.
Allcock v. Hall, 93, iii.
Angus v. Clifford (39 W.R. 252), 16,

41, iii.
Apollinaris Co.'s Trade Mark, re

(39 W.R. 309), 16, 54, iii.
Argentine Gold Fields, e. p. ; re Low

(L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. 147), 16, 37, ii.
Arbib & Class, re, 103 v.; 105, vi.
Armstrong S. London Tram.

ways Co., 87, iii.
Ashling v. Boon, 80, i.
Asia, the, 99, iii.
Askew v. A., 71, i.
A.-G. v. Edwards (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.
194), 16, 39, i.

v. Morgan, 79, ii.

v. Woodall (60 L.J. Ch. 101), 16,
20, ix.
Aylesford (Earl) v. Poulett (Earl),

100, vi.
Aylward v. Lewis, 92, ii.

BAKER V. Rawson (60 L.J. Ch. 49),

16, 64, iv.
Bank of England v. Vagliano, 74, ii.
Barnett v. King (60 L.J. Ch. 148), 16,

36, iv.
Barney v. Joshua Stubbs (L.R. [1891]
1 Ch. 187), 16, 40, it.

76, v.
Barrow v. Isaacs, 82, iii.
Baxter v. London County Council,

78, iv.
Beasley v. Roney, 86, v.
Beauclerk v. B., 81, i.
Beckett v. Tower Assets Co. (60 L.J.

Q.B. 56), 16, 38, iii.
Belcher v. Williams (39 W.R. 266),

16, 52, iii.
Bell Cox v. Hakes (60 L.J. Q.B. 89),

16, 45, ii.
Bellamy v. Debenham, 104, v.

v. Wells (60 L.J. Ch. 156),
16, 51, vi.
Bellencontre, re, 80, ii.
Bethune v. B. (60 L.J. P. 18), 16,

11, v.
Bilke v. Roper (60 L.J. Ch. 57), 16,

49, ii.
Bills v. Tatham (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.82;

60 L.J. Ch. 111; 63 L.T. 752), 16,
68, ii.
Bird v. Davey (63 L.T. 741), 16,

38, v.
Blyth v. Fladgate (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.

337 ; 60 L.J. Ch. 66), 16, 63, iii.
Bolton v. Buckenbam, 94, v.

v. Salmon, 94, vi.
Bowers v. Harding, 96, iii.

[ocr errors]

Boydell y. Millar, 78, v.
Brandon v.

McHenry, 72, iv.
Braunstein v. Lewis, 85, v.
Bridgewater Navigation Co., re,

77, v.
Briggs & Spicer, re, 104, iv.
Britannia Fire Association, re, 77, ii.
British Tanning Co. v. Groth, 88, v.
Brown v. Tombs, 95, v.
Bruce v. Abercarn Colliery Co., 87, v.
Budd v. Lucas, 102, i.
Budgett v. Binnington (63 L.T. 742),

16, 61, v.
Burnley, &c., Society v. Casson (60 L.J.

M.C. 59), 16, 35, iii,
Burrup v. L. & S.W.R., 90, i.
Bart v. Arnold, 105, v.

[ocr errors]

Calliope, the, 100, i.
Castioni, e. p. (L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B.

149; 60 L.J. M.C. 22), 16, 45, i.
Champ v. Marshallsay, 102, ii.
Charles v. Plymouth Waterworks
Mortgagees (60 L.J. M.C. 20),

18, 49, iv.
Chatenay v. Brazilian Telegraph Co.

(63 L.T. 739), 16, 42, iv.
City of Peking, the (63 L.T. 722), 16,

62, v.
Clink v. Radford, 98, i.
Colonial Bank v. Cady (60 L.J. Ch.

131), 16, 8, iii.
Cony beare v. London School Board

(60 L.J. Q.B. 44; 39 W.R. 288),

16, 44, v.
Cooke v. Smith, 91, vi.
Cormack, goods of (L.R. [1891] P.

151), 16, 34, vi.
County of Durham, the (60 L.J. P. 5;

64 L.T. 146; 39 W.R. 303), 16,

61, i.
Cox v. Ambrose, 88, ii.
v. Bennett, 103, iv.

No. 2, 86, iv.
& Neve, re, 104, iii.
Crawford, goods of (60 L.J. P. 16),

16, 30, vi.
Cressington, the, 97, iv.
Crisp v. Thomas, 87, iji.
Crumbie v. Wallsend Local Board,

84, iv.
Curfew, the, 98, iii.
Curtis v. Kesteven County Council

(60 L.J. Ch. 103), 16, 48, i.
Cusack v. L. & N.W.R., 91, ii.

Dashwood v. Magniac, 101, ii.
De Francesco v. Barnum (60 L.J. Ch.

63), 16, 35, ii.
De Pass v. Capital, &c., Corporation,

92, iv.
Dillon v. Haverfordwest Corporation,

96, ii.
Docksey v. Else, 92, iii.
Drew v. Willis, 91, iii.
Drummond & Davie's Contract, re,

86, i.
Darham Coanty Council v. Chester-
le-Street Assessment Committee
(60 L.J. M.C. 9), 16, 53, ii.

89, v.
EALING LOCAL BOARD, e. p. ; re Tre.

HEARNE (60 L.J. Q.B. 50; 63 L.T.

799), 16, 37, vii.
Edmundson & Sandbach, re (L.R.

[189101 Ch. 99; 60 L.J. Ch. 60),

16, 66, iv.
Edwards v. Marston (L.R. (1891)

1 Q.B. 225 ; 60 L.J. Q.B. 202; 64
L.T. 97), 16, 38, iv.

v. Roberts (L.R. (1891] 1
Q.B. 302), 16, 56, i.
Edye, re (63 L.T. 762), 16, 36, ii.
Elliott v. Johnson, 105, iv.
Elve v. Boyton, 103, ii.
Empire Trast Co., re, 76, i.
England v. Provincial Assets Co.,

73, vi.
Evans, goods of (60 L.J. P. 18), 16,
35, i.

e. p.; re E. (L.R. (1891] 1
Q.B. 143 ; 64 L.T. 242 ; 60 L.J.
Q.B. 143), 16, 37, iïi.

v.

FARMERS, &c., DAIRIES Co. v. STEVEN.

SON, 71, ï.
Favell v. Wright, 79, iii.
Fillingham v. Wood (60 L.J.Ch. 232;
64 L.T. 46; 39 W.R. 282), 16,

50, iii.
Ford v. L. & S.W.R., 95, ii.

v. Nuthall, 73, i.
Frames v. Bultfontein Mining Co.

(L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 140; 60 L.J.

Ch. 99; 64 L.T. 12), 16, 40, v.
Fuente's Trade Mark, re, 101, iii.

GALE V. OVEREND (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B.

269), 16, 59, ii.
General Service Co-operative Stores,

re, 94, iii.
Gibbs v. Messer, 75, iv.
Government Stock Iuvestment Co.,

re, 75, v.

DARLINGTON, &c., WAGON Co. v. Har-

DING (L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B. 245 ;
60 L.J. Q.B. 110), 16, 35, iv.

Graham's Trusts, re (L.R. [1891]

1 Ch. 151; 60 L.J. Ch. 98), 16,

56, vii.
Greenwood v. Turner, 103, vii.

e.

HALIFAX BANKING Co. v. GLEDHILL

(60 L.J. Ch. 181), 16, 58, iii.
Hamilton v. Brogden, 94, i.
Hammond v. Schofield, 92,
Handley v. H. (L.R. [1891] P. 124),

16, 45, iii.
Harris v. Phillips, 95, vi.
Harrison, &c., v. Barrow Corporation,

82, iv.
Heckscher v. Crossley (L.R. (1891]

1 Q.B. 224; 60 L.J. Q.B. 75), 16,
54, iv.
Hewett v. Barr (39 W.R. 294), 16,

57, vi.
Hick v. Rodocanachi, 98, ii.
Hicks v. Tweedy, 98, iv.
Hogarth v. Miller, 98, v.
Holliday v. Wakefield (Mayor), 105, ii.
Home & Colonial Stores v. Todd,

83, i.
Hornsey Local Board V. Brewis,

85, ii.

Lea Conservancy v. Tottenham Local

Board, 96, vi.
Learoyd v. Brook, 71, iji.
Leavesley, re, 85, iii.
Leicester County Council, p.

(60 L.J. M.C. 45; 64 L.T. 25), 16,

48, ii.
Liverpool, &c., Bread Co. v. Frith

(L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 367 ; 60 L.J.
Ch. 153; 39 W.R. 269), 16, 55, iv.

Corn Trade Association v.
L. & N.W.R. (60 L.J. Q.B. 76), 16,
58, v.
Lloyd v. Carr (60 L.J. Ch. 175), 16,

34, iv.
London Bank of Mexico v. Apthorpe,
96, i.

- Chartered Bank of Australasia
v. Cady (60 L.J. Ch. 131), 16, 8, iii.
L. & N.W.R. v. Boulton, 103, vi.
Long v. L. (60 L.J. P. 27), 16, 45, v.
Lopes v.

Hume-Dick, 103, i.
Lowe, e. p. ; re Standard Co., 76, iii.
Lyons v. Hoffnung (39 W.R. 390),

16, 59, v.

JAMES v. Dawson (60 L.J. Ch. 85),
16, 28, iii.

v. Smith (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.
384; 39 W.R. 396), 16, 57, i.
Jenkins v. Bushby, 93, i.

v. Jackson (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.
89; 39 W.R. 242; 60 L.J. Ch. 206),

16, 55, i.
Jenoúre v. Delmege, 84, ii.
Johnstone v. Mappin, 97, i.
Jones v. Macaulay (L.R. (1891] 1

Q.B. 221), 16, 55, iii.
Joyce v. Beall, 91, vii.

KENT COUNTY COUNCIL AND COUNCILS

of Dover & SANDWICH, e. p., 85, i.
King's College, Cambridge, e. p.,

83, iii.
Knight & Tabernacle Building

Society, re, 74, v.

McGowan, e. p.; re ASHTON, 88, iii.

-,- v. Murray, 100, vii.
Mackay v. M'Guire (L.R. [1891] 1

Q.B. 250; 64 L.T. 83), 16, 59, iii.
M'Mahon v. North Kent Ironworks,

76, iv.
Madell v. Thomas, 74, iv.
Makins v. Peroy Ibotson (L.R. [1891]

1 Ch. 133; 60 L.J. Ch. 164), 16,

41, iv.
Mallinson v. Carr (60 L.J. M.C. 34 ;

39 W.R. 270), 16, 66, iii.
Manchester (Mayor) v. Williams

(63 L.T. 805; 39 W.R. 302), 16,
46, v.

& County Bank, e. p.; re
Hulton, 74, i.
Margrett, e. p.; re Soltykoff, 81, vi.
Marianne, the, 99, vi.
Marks v. Beyfus (63 L.T. 733), 16,
Meeus's Application, re (60 L.J. Ch.

96), 16, 65, i.
Merthyr Tydvil Local Board v. M. T.

Assessment Committee (L.R. (1891]
1 Q.B. 186; 60 L.J.M.C. 42;

39 W.R. 255), 16, 53, iv.
Michell v. M., 81, iv.
Miller v. Dell (L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B.

468 ; 39 W.R. 342), 16, 47, iv.
Mills v. Dunham, 95, vii.
Mirams, re, 73, v.
Monk v. Bartram, 93, iv.

10, iv.

LACON v. L., 105, iii.
L. & Y.R. v. Bolton (Mayor) (60 L.J.

Q.B. 118), 16, 48, iii.
Lander v. L., 81, iji.
Langham. & L. Hotel Co., re (60 L.J.

Ch. 110), 16, 67, iii.
Langlois & Biden, re (L.R. [1891]

1 Q.B. 349; 60 L.J. Q.B. 123 ; 63

L.T. 816), 16, 43, ii.
Lawrance v. Edwards, 79, iv,

Montgomerie v. United Kingdom

Mutual Steamship Association,

82, ii.
Moody v. Penfold, 103, iii.
Moore v. Atkinson (L.R. (1891] 1
Q.B. 269), 16, 59, ii.

v. Knight, 84, v.
Morgan v. Blyth (L.R. (1891] 1 Ch.

337; 60 L.J. Ch. 66), 18, 63, vi.
Mount Vernon, the, 99, v.
Mundy's Settled Estates, re (L.R.

[189101 Ch. 399 ; 64L.T. 29), 18,

60, iv.
Murugaser v. De Soysa, 75, ii.
NATIONAL BANK V. SILKE, 75, i.

Debenture, &c., Corpora.
tion, re, 76, vi.

Wholemeal Bread Co., re,
94, iv.
New Chile Gold Co., re (60 L.J.

Ch. 90), 16, 42, iii.
Noble v. Killick, 95, i.
North v. Stewart (63 L.T. 718), 16,
60, ii.

Lonsdale Iron, &c., Co. v.
Farness Railway Co., 95, iii.

Read v. Bishop of Lincoln, 79, vi.
Redfern v. R. (L.R. (1891] P. 139;
60 L.J. P. 9; 64 L.T. 68), 16, 55, v.

V.

93, vi.
Reeve v. Gibson, 78, iii.
Reg. v. Barnardo (Jones's Case)

(L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B. 194; 64 L.T.
72), 16, 46, i; 54, ii.

v. Bowerman (60 L.J. M.C. 13),
16, 43, v.
— v. Byrde (60 L.J. M.C. 17), 16,
46, ii.

v. Cloete, 87, iv.

v. Inland Revenue Commis.
sioners, 89, i.

v. Jackson, 80, iv.

v. Kensington Assessment Com.
mittee, 90, ii.

v. London (Bishop), No. 2, 79, v.

v. Soutter (60 L.J. Q.B. 71 ; 64
L.T. 40), 16, 50, i.

v. Vreones, 79, i.
Rialto, the, 99, vii.
Richards v. Butcher, 101, iv.
Ricketts v. R., 102, iii.
Ritchie v. Sexton, 83, iv.
Roberts v. Cooper, 86, ii.
Rogers v. Lambert (L.R. (1891]1 Q.B.

318; 60 L.J. Q.B. 187), 16, 36,

iii.

ONSLOW V. INLAND REVENUE Com.

MISSIONERS, 96, v.
Opera, Limited, re (39 W.R. 398),

15, 111, v.
O'Shea v. Wood, 91, v.

Ruby, the (63 L.T. 735), 16, 24, ii.
Roff v. Sivers (63 L.T. 746), 16,

57, v. ; 68, v.

PAINE V. CHISHOLM, 90, vi.
Payne v. Thomas (39 W.R. 240), 16,

47, ii.
Pittard v. Oliver, 100, ii.
Plant v. Potts, 95, iv.
Plomley v. Shepherd, 75, iii.
Poppleton, e. p.; re Lock, 73, ii.
Porrett, re, 100, iv.
Powell v. Thomas (63 L.T. 812), 16,

55, ii.
Pullman v. Hill, 84, i.
Patney Overseers v. L. & S.W.R.

(L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B. 182 ; 63 L.T.
802), 18, 53, iii.

SAINT MARTIN'S VESTRY V. GORDON

(60 L.J. M.C. 37; 64 L.T. 243;

39 W.R. 295), 16, 50, ii.
Salford (Mayor) v. Lever (L.R. [1891]

1 Q.B. 168 ; 60 L.J. Q.B. 39), 16,
58, ii.
Sandbach & Edmondson, re (63 LT,

797), 16, 66, iv.
Saxby v. Thomas, 104, ii.
Schlesinger v. Bedford, 78, ii.

v. Turner, 78, i.
Scholes v. Brook, 101, i.
Scott v. Hanbury, 90, iv.

v. Homer (60 L.J. Ch. 238),
16, 54, v.
Seaton, e. p. ; re Deerhorst, 73, iii.
Selig v. Lion, 91, i.
Sergent v. S., 80, v.
Serraino v. Campbell, 97, iii.
Sharpe v. Wakefield, 84, ii.
Shepherd v. Berger, 83, ii.
Showers v. Chelmsford Assessment

Committee, 89, iv.
Simmons v. London Joint Stock Bank,

72, iii.

[blocks in formation]

Vindomora, the, 99, i.
Violet Nevin, re, 81, v.
Vivian v. Kennelly, 91, iv.

Slevin v. Hepburn (L.R. (1891] 1

Ch. 273; 60 L.J. Ch. 200 ; 39 W.R.

284), 16, 33, i.
Smith v. Blyth (L.R. (1891]1 Ch.337 ;
60 L.J. Ch. 66), 16, 65, iv.

v. Pyman (60 L.J. Q.B. 127 ;
39 W.R. 318), 16, 61, ii.
South Staffordshire Tramways Co. v.

Sickness, &c., Assurance Associa-
tion, 82, i.
Spence v. Dodsworth, 90, v.
Stanley v. Powell (60 L.J. Q.B. 52 ;

63 L.T. 809), 16, 65, iii.
Steinman v. Angier Line, 97, ii.
Stevens v. Marston (60 L.J. Q.B. 192),

16, 38, ii. ; 56, iii.
Stone v. Lickorish, 88, i.
Streatley, goods of, 106, i.
Surman v. Wharton, 86, vi.
Sutton v. Wade (L.R. (1891] 1 Q.B.
269), 16, 59, ii.

Harbour Co. v. Plymouth
Guardians, 89, iii.
Swift v. 8. (L.R. (1891] P. 129 ; 60

L.J. P. 14), 16, 45, vi.
Talabot, the (63 L.T. 812), 16, 62, iii.
Talbot, the, 99, ii.
Thorley v. Massam, 96, iv.
Titia, the, 93, vii.
Tobias, e. p. ; re T., 72, v.
Tarner v. Goldsmith, 87, i.
Tyler v. Merchant Taylors' Co. (63

L.T. 779), 16, 69, iv.

WANZER, LIMITED, re, 77, iv.
Webster, re, 100, v.
Wenham Co. v. Champion Gas Lamp

Co., 88, iv.
Wenman v. Lyon, 85, iv.
Wentworth V. Hull, &c., Railway,

104, i.
Westacott v. Bevan, 100, iii.
Western National Bank of New York

v. Perez Triana & Co., 94, ii.
Westmore v. Pain, 93, ii.
Westmoreland Green & Blue Slate

Co. v. Feilden, 77, iii.
Weymouth, &c., Steam Packet Co., re

(L.R. (1891] 1 Ch. 66; 60 L.J. Ch.

93), 16, 42, ii.
Whiteley and Roberts’s Arbitration,

re, 72, i.
Whittaker, e. p. ; re Parrott, 73, iv.
Wignall v. Park, 74, vi.
Wilding v. Bean (64 L.T. 41), 16,

57, ii.
Williams v. Frere, 93, v.
Williamson v. Hine (L.R. (1891] 1

Ch. 390; 60 L.J. Ch. 123 ; 39 W.R.

239), 16, 63, ii.
Witherby v. Rackham, 86, iii.
Witt v. W., 81, ii.
Wolverhampton Corporation v. Bil.

ston Commissioners, 105, i.
Woodward v. Heseltine, 74, iii.

Umbilo, the, 99, iv.
Underwood v. Jones, 89, ii.

YERBURGH V. Aston, 92, i.

VERNON V. WATSON, 80, iii.
Vickers v. Siddell (60 L.J. Ch. 105;

39 W.R. 385), 16, 52, v.

ZOUTSPANSBERG PROSPECTING Co., e. p.;

re, JOHANNESBURG HOTEL Co., 76, ii.

« PreviousContinue »