Page images
PDF
EPUB

Quarterly Digest.

INDEX

of the cases reported during February, March, and April, 1891.

Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding
quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case,
with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first
appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.

ABRAHAMS V. DEAKIN (L.R. [1891]

1 Q.B. 516), 16, 49, vi.
Abstainers, &c., Insurance Co., re,
76, vii.

Accomac, the (63 L.T. 737), 16,
61, iv.

Adams v. Great North of Scotland
Ry. Co., 72, ii.

Agricultural Hotel Co., re (L.R. [1891]
1 Ch. 396; 60 L.J. Ch. 208; 63 L.T.
748), 16, 41, v.

Alabama, &c., Ry. Co., re (60 L.J.
Ch. 77), 16, 42, i.

[ocr errors]

re, 77, i.
Alden v. Beckley (60 L.J. Q.B. 87),
16, 57, iii.

Allcock v. Hall, 93, iii.

Angus v. Clifford (39 W.R. 252), 16,
41, iii.

Apollinaris Co.'s Trade Mark, re
(39 W.R. 309), 16, 54, iii.
Argentine Gold Fields, e. p.; re Low
(L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. 147), 16, 37, ii.
Arbib & Class, re, 103 v.; 105, vi.
Armstrong V. S. London

ways Co., 87, iii.

Ashling v. Boon, 80, i.

Asia, the, 99, iii.

Askew v. A., 71, i.

Tram.

A.-G. v. Edwards (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch.
194), 16, 39, i.

v. Morgan, 79, ii.

v. Woodall (60 L.J. Ch. 101), 16,
20, ix.
Aylesford (Earl) v. Poulett (Earl),
100, vi.

Aylward v. Lewis, 92, ii.

BAKER V. RAWSON (60 L.J. Ch. 49),
16, 64, iv.

Bank of England v. Vagliano, 74, ii.
Barnett v. King (60 L.J. Ch. 148), 16,
36, iv.

Barney v. Joshua Stubbs (L.R. [1891]
1 Ch. 187), 16, 40, iv.

V.

[ocr errors]

76, v.
Barrow v. Isaacs, 82, iii.
Baxter v. London County Council,
78, iv.

Beasley v. Roney, 86, v.
Beauclerk v. B., 81, i.

Beckett v. Tower Assets Co. (60 L.J.
Q.B. 56), 16, 38, iii.

Belcher v. Williams (39 W.R. 266),
16, 52, iii.

Bell Cox v. Hakes (60 L.J. Q.B. 89),
16, 45, ii.
Bellamy v. Debenham, 104, v..
v. Wells (60 L.J. Ch. 156),
16, 51, vi.
Bellencontre, re, 80, ii.
Bethune v. B. (60 L.J. P. 18), 16,
11, v.

Bilke v. Roper (60 L.J. Ch. 57), 16,
49, ii.

Bills v. Tatham (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 82;
60 L.J. Ch. 111; 63 L.T. 752), 16,
68, ii.

Bird v. Davey (63 L.T. 741), 16,
38, v.

Blyth v. Fladgate (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch.
337; 60 L.J. Ch. 66), 16, 63, iii.
Bolton v. Buckenham, 94, v.

v. Salmon, 94, vi.
Bowers v. Harding, 96, iii.

[blocks in formation]

Briggs & Spicer, re, 104, iv.
Britannia Fire Association, re, 77, ii.
British Tanning Co. v. Groth, 88, v.
Brown v. Tombs, 95, v.

Bruce v. Abercarn Colliery Co., 87, v.
Budd v. Lucas, 102, i.

Budgett v. Binnington (63 L.T. 742),
16, 61, v.

Burnley, &c., Society v. Casson (60 L.J.

M.C. 59), 16, 35, iii.

Burrup v. L. & S.W.R., 90, i.
Burt v. Arnold, 105, v.

Calliope, the, 100, i.

Castioni, e. p. (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B.

149; 60 L.J. M.C. 22), 16, 45, i.
Champ v. Marshallsay, 102, ii.
Charles v. Plymouth Waterworks
Mortgagees (60 L.J. M.C. 20),
16, 49, iv.

Chatenay v. Brazilian Telegraph Co.
(63 L.T. 739), 16, 42, iv.

City of Peking, the (63 L.T. 722), 16,
62, v.

Clink v. Radford, 98, i.

Colonial Bank v. Cady (60 L.J. Ch.
131), 16, 8, iii.

Conybeare v. London School Board
(60 L.J. Q.B. 44; 39 W.R. 288),
16, 44, v.

Cooke v. Smith, 91, vi.

Cormack, goods of (L.R. [1891] P.
151), 16, 34, vi.
County of Durham, the (60

L.J. P. 5;

64 L.T. 146; 39 W.R. 303), 16,

61, i.

[blocks in formation]

Dashwood v. Magniac, 101, ii.

De Francesco v. Barnum (60 L.J. Ch.
63), 16, 35, ii.

De Pass v. Capital, &c., Corporation,
92, iv.

Dillon v. Haverfordwest Corporation,
96, ii.

Docksey v. Else, 92, iii.
Drew v. Willis, 91, iii.
Drummond & Davie's Contract, re,
86, i.

Durham County Council v. Chester-
le-Street Assessment Committee
(60 L.J. M.C. 9), 16, 53, ii.
89, v.

V.

EALING LOCAL BOARD, e. p.; re TRE-
HEARNE (60 L.J. Q.B. 50; 63 L.T.
799), 16, 37, vii.

Edmundson & Sandbach, re (L.R.
[1891] 1 Ch. 99; 60 L.J. Ch. 60),
16, 66, iv.
Edwards v. Marston (L.R. [1891]
1 Q.B. 225; 60 L.J. Q.B. 202; 64
L.T. 97), 16, 38, iv.

v. Roberts (L.R. [1891] 1
Q.B. 302), 16, 56, i.

Edye, re (63 L.T. 762), 16, 36, ii.
Elliott v. Johnson, 105, iv.
Elve v. Boyton, 103, ii.
Empire Trust Co., re, 76, i.

England v. Provincial Assets Co.,
73, vi.

Evans, goods of (60 L.J. P. 18), 16,
35, i.

[ocr errors]

e. p.; re E. (L.R. [1891] 1
Q.B. 143; 64 L.T. 242; 60 L.J.
Q.B. 143), 16, 37, iii.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Harrison, &c., v. Barrow Corporation,
82, iv.

Heckscher v. Crossley (L.R. [1891]
1 Q.B. 224; 60 L.J. Q.B. 75), 16,
54, iv.

Hewett v. Barr (39 W.R. 294), 16,
57, vi.

Hick v. Rodocanachi, 98, ii.
Hicks v. Tweedy, 98, iv.

Hogarth v. Miller, 98, v.

Holliday v. Wakefield (Mayor), 105, ii.
Home & Colonial Stores v. Todd,
83, i.

Hornsey Local Board v. Brewis,
85, ii.

JAMES V. DAWSON (60 L.J. Ch. 85),
16, 28, iii.

v. Smith (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch.
384; 39 W.R. 396), 16, 57, i.
Jenkins v. Bushby, 93, i.

v. Jackson (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch.
89; 39 W.R. 242; 60 L.J. Ch. 206),
16, 55, i.

Jenoure v. Delmege, 84, ii.
Johnstone v. Mappin, 97, i.

Jones v. Macaulay (L.R. [1891] 1
Q.B. 221), 16, 55, iii.
Joyce v. Beall, 91, vii.

KENT COUNTY COUNCIL AND COUNCILS
OF DOVER & SANDWICH, e. p., 85, i.
King's College, Cambridge, e. p.,
83, iii.

Knight & Tabernacle Building
Society, re, 74, v.

LACON V. L., 105, iii.

L. & Y.R. v. Bolton (Mayor) (60 L.J.
Q.B. 118), 16, 48, iii.
Lander v. L., 81, iii.
Langham & L. Hotel Co., re (60 L.J.
Ch. 110), 16, 67, iii.

Langlois & Biden, re (L.R. [1891]
1 Q.B. 349; 60 L.J. Q.B. 123; 63
L.T. 816), 16, 43, iii.

Lawrance v. Edwards, 79, iv.

Lea Conservancy v. Tottenham Local
Board, 96, vi.
Learoyd v. Brook, 71, iii.
Leavesley, re, 85, iii.

Leicester County Council, e. p.
(60 L.J. M.C. 45; 64 L.T. 25), 16,
48, ii.
Liverpool, &c., Bread Co. v. Frith
(L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 367; 60 L.J.
Ch. 153; 39 W.R. 269), 16, 55, iv.
Corn Trade Association v.
L. & N.W.R. (60 L.J. Q.B. 76), 16,
58, v.

Lloyd v. Carr (60 L.J. Ch. 175), 16,
34, iv.

London Bank of Mexico v. Apthorpe,
96, i.

[blocks in formation]

MCGOWAN, e. p.; re ASHTON, 88, iii.
--- v. Murray, 100, vii.

Mackay v. M'Guire (L.R. [1891] 1
Q.B. 250; 64 L.T. 83), 16, 59, iii.
M'Mahon v. North Kent Ironworks,
76, iv.

Madell v. Thomas, 74, iv.

Makins v. Percy Ibotson (L.R. [1891]
1 Ch. 133; 60 L.J. Ch. 164), 16,
41, iv.
Mallinson v. Carr (60 L.J. M.C. 34;
39 W.R. 270), 16, 66, iii.
Manchester (Mayor) V. Williams
(63 L.T. 805; 39 W.R. 302), 16,
46, v.

& County Bank, e. p.; re
Hulton, 74, i.

Margrett, e. p.; re Soltykoff, 81, vi.
Marianne, the, 99, vi.

Marks v. Beyfus (63 L.T. 733), 16,
10, iv.

Meeus's Application, re (60 L.J. Ch.
96), 16, 65, i.

Merthyr Tydvil Local Board v. M. T.
Assessment Committee (L. R. [1891]
1 Q.B. 186; 60 L.J. M.C. 42;
39 W.R. 255), 16, 53, iv.
Michell v. M., 81, iv.
Miller v. Dell (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B.

468; 39 W.R. 342), 16, 47, iv.
Mills v. Dunham, 95, vii.
Mirams, re, 73, v.

Monk v. Bartram, 93, iv.

[blocks in formation]

PAINE V. CHISHOLM, 90, vi.

Payne v. Thomas (39 W.R. 240), 16,
47, ii.

Pittard v. Oliver, 100, ii.

Plant v. Potts, 95, iv.
Plomley v. Shepherd, 75, iii.
Poppleton, e. p.; re Lock, 73, ii.
Porrett, re, 100, iv.

Powell v. Thomas (63 L.T. 812), 16,
55, ii.

Pullman v. Hill, 84, i.

Patney Overseers v. L. & S.W.R.
(L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. 182; 63 L.T.
802), 16, 53, iii.

90, ii.

V.

Pyle Works, re (No. 2) (L.R. [1891]
1 Ch. 173; 60 L.J. Ch. 114; 39
W.R. 235), 16, 40, iii.

QUEENSLAND MERCANTILE AND AGENCY
Co., re, 77, vi

RAISON, e. p.; re R. (60 L.J. Q.B.
206; 39 W.R. 271), 16, 37, vi.

Read v. Bishop of Lincoln, 79, vi.
Redfern v. R. (L.R. [1891] P. 139;
60 L.J. P. 9; 64 L.T. 68), 16, 55, v.
V. - 93, vi.

Reeve v. Gibson, 78, iii.
Reg. V. Barnardo (Jones's Case)
(L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. 194; 64 L.T.
72), 16, 46, i; 54, ii.

v. Bowerman (60 L.J. M.C. 13),
16, 43, v.

v. Byrde (60 L.J. M.C. 17), 16,
46, ii.

v. Cloete, 87, iv.

v. Inland Revenue Commis-
sioners, 89, i.

v. Jackson, 80, iv.

v. Kensington Assessment Com.
mittee, 90, iii.

v. London (Bishop), No. 2, 79, v.
v. Soutter (60 L.J. Q.B. 71; 64
L.T. 40), 16, 50, i.

v. Vreones, 79, i.
Rialto, the, 99, vii.
Richards v. Butcher, 101, iv.
Ricketts v. R., 102, iii.
Ritchie v. Sexton, 83, iv.
Roberts v. Cooper, 86, ii.
Rogers v. Lambert (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B.
318; 60 L.J. Q.B. 187), 16, 36,
iii.

Ruby, the (63 L.T. 735), 16, 24, ii.
Ruff v. Sivers (63 L.T. 746), 16,
57, v.; 68, v.

SAINT MARTIN'S VESTRY v. GORDON
(60 L.J. M.C. 37; 64 L.T. 243;
39 W.R. 295), 16, 50, ii.
Salford (Mayor) v. Lever (L.R. [1891]
1 Q.B. 168; 60 L.J. Q.B. 39), 16,
58, ii.

Sandbach & Edmondson, re (63 L.T.
797), 16, 66, iv.

Saxby v. Thomas, 104, ii.

Schlesinger v. Bedford, 78, ii.

v. Turner, 78, i.

Scholes v. Brook, 101, i.

Scott v. Hanbury, 90, iv.

v. Homer (60 L.J. Ch. 238),
16, 54, v.

Seaton, e. p.; re Deerhurst, 73, iii.
Selig v. Lion, 91, i.

Sergent v. S., 80, v.
Serraino v. Campbell, 97, iii.
Sharpe v. Wakefield, 84, iii.
Shepherd v. Berger, 83, ii.
Showers v. Chelmsford Assessment
Committee, 89, iv.

Simmons v. London Joint Stock Bank,
72, iii.

Slevin v. Hepburn (L.R. [1891] 1
Ch. 273; 60 L.J. Ch. 200; 39 W.R.
284), 16, 33, i.

Smith v. Blyth (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 337;
60 L.J. Ch. 66), 16, 65, iv.

v. Pyman (60 L.J. Q.B. 127 ;
39 W.R. 318), 16, 61, ii.
South Staffordshire Tramways Co. v.
Sickness, &c., Assurance Associa-
tion, 82, i.

Spence v. Dodsworth, 90, v.
Stanley v. Powell (60 L.J. Q.B. 52;
63 L.T. 809), 16, 65, iii.
Steinman v. Angier Line, 97, ii.
Stevens v. Marston (60 L.J. Q.B. 192),
16, 38, ii.; 56, iii.
Stone v. Lickorish, 88, i.
Streatley, goods of, 106, i.
Surman v. Wharton, 86, vi.

Sutton v. Wade (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B.
269), 16, 59, ii.

Harbour Co. v. Plymouth
Guardians, 89, iii.

Swift v. 8. (L.R. [1891] P. 129; 60
L.J. P. 14), 16, 45, vi.

Talabot, the (63 L.T. 812), 16, 62, iii.
Talbot, the, 99, ii.

Thorley v. Massam, 96, iv.

Titia, the, 93, vii.

Tobias, e. p. ; re T., 72, v.

Turner v. Goldsmith, 87, i.

Tyler v. Merchant Taylors' Co. (63
L.T. 779), 16, 69, iv.

Umbilo, the, 99, iv.
Underwood v. Jones, 89, ii.

VERNON V. WATSON, 80, iii.
Vickers v. Siddell (60 L.J. Ch. 105;
39 W.R. 385), 16, 52, v.

Vindomora, the, 99, i.
Violet Nevin, re, 81, v.
Vivian v.

Kennelly, 91, iv.

WANZER, LIMITED, re, 77, iv.
Webster, re, 100, v.

Wenham Co. v. Champion Gas Lamp
Co., 88, iv.

Wenman v. Lyon, 85, iv.

Wentworth v. Hull, &c., Railway,
104, i.

Westacott v. Bevan, 100, iii.

Western National Bank of New York
v. Perez Triana & Co., 94, ii.
Westmore v. Pain, 93, ii.
Westmoreland Green & Blue Slate
Co. v. Feilden, 77, iii.

Weymouth, &c., Steam Packet Co., re
(L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 66; 60 L.J. Ch.
93), 16, 42, ii.

Whiteley and Roberts's Arbitration,
re, 72, i.

Whittaker, e. p.; re Parrott, 73, iv.
Wignall v. Park, 74, vi.

Wilding v. Bean (64 L.T. 41), 16,
57, ii.

Williams v. Frere, 93, v.

Williamson v. Hine (L.R. [1891] 1
Ch. 390; 60 L.J. Ch. 123; 39 W.R.
239), 16, 63, ii.

Witherby v. Rackham, 86, iii.
Witt v. W., 81, ii.

Wolverhampton Corporation v. Bil.

ston Commissioners, 105, i.
Woodward v. Heseltine, 74, iii.

YERBURGH V. Aston, 92, i.

ZOUTSPANSBERG PROSPECTING CO., e. p. ;
re, JOHANNESBURG HOTEL Co., 76, ii.

« PreviousContinue »