Quarterly Digest. INDEX of the cases reported during February, March, and April, 1891. Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding ABRAHAMS V. DEAKIN (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. 516), 16, 49, vi. Accomac, the (63 L.T. 737), 16, Adams v. Great North of Scotland Agricultural Hotel Co., re (L.R. [1891] Alabama, &c., Ry. Co., re (60 L.J. re, 77, i. Allcock v. Hall, 93, iii. Angus v. Clifford (39 W.R. 252), 16, Apollinaris Co.'s Trade Mark, re ways Co., 87, iii. Ashling v. Boon, 80, i. Asia, the, 99, iii. Askew v. A., 71, i. Tram. A.-G. v. Edwards (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. v. Morgan, 79, ii. v. Woodall (60 L.J. Ch. 101), 16, Aylward v. Lewis, 92, ii. BAKER V. RAWSON (60 L.J. Ch. 49), Bank of England v. Vagliano, 74, ii. Barney v. Joshua Stubbs (L.R. [1891] V. 76, v. Beasley v. Roney, 86, v. Beckett v. Tower Assets Co. (60 L.J. Belcher v. Williams (39 W.R. 266), Bell Cox v. Hakes (60 L.J. Q.B. 89), Bilke v. Roper (60 L.J. Ch. 57), 16, Bills v. Tatham (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 82; Bird v. Davey (63 L.T. 741), 16, Blyth v. Fladgate (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. v. Salmon, 94, vi. Briggs & Spicer, re, 104, iv. Bruce v. Abercarn Colliery Co., 87, v. Budgett v. Binnington (63 L.T. 742), Burnley, &c., Society v. Casson (60 L.J. M.C. 59), 16, 35, iii. Burrup v. L. & S.W.R., 90, i. Calliope, the, 100, i. Castioni, e. p. (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. 149; 60 L.J. M.C. 22), 16, 45, i. Chatenay v. Brazilian Telegraph Co. City of Peking, the (63 L.T. 722), 16, Clink v. Radford, 98, i. Colonial Bank v. Cady (60 L.J. Ch. Conybeare v. London School Board Cooke v. Smith, 91, vi. Cormack, goods of (L.R. [1891] P. L.J. P. 5; 64 L.T. 146; 39 W.R. 303), 16, 61, i. Dashwood v. Magniac, 101, ii. De Francesco v. Barnum (60 L.J. Ch. De Pass v. Capital, &c., Corporation, Dillon v. Haverfordwest Corporation, Docksey v. Else, 92, iii. Durham County Council v. Chester- V. EALING LOCAL BOARD, e. p.; re TRE- Edmundson & Sandbach, re (L.R. v. Roberts (L.R. [1891] 1 Edye, re (63 L.T. 762), 16, 36, ii. England v. Provincial Assets Co., Evans, goods of (60 L.J. P. 18), 16, e. p.; re E. (L.R. [1891] 1 Harrison, &c., v. Barrow Corporation, Heckscher v. Crossley (L.R. [1891] Hewett v. Barr (39 W.R. 294), 16, Hick v. Rodocanachi, 98, ii. Hogarth v. Miller, 98, v. Holliday v. Wakefield (Mayor), 105, ii. Hornsey Local Board v. Brewis, JAMES V. DAWSON (60 L.J. Ch. 85), v. Smith (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. v. Jackson (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. Jenoure v. Delmege, 84, ii. Jones v. Macaulay (L.R. [1891] 1 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL AND COUNCILS Knight & Tabernacle Building LACON V. L., 105, iii. L. & Y.R. v. Bolton (Mayor) (60 L.J. Langlois & Biden, re (L.R. [1891] Lawrance v. Edwards, 79, iv. Lea Conservancy v. Tottenham Local Leicester County Council, e. p. Lloyd v. Carr (60 L.J. Ch. 175), 16, London Bank of Mexico v. Apthorpe, MCGOWAN, e. p.; re ASHTON, 88, iii. Mackay v. M'Guire (L.R. [1891] 1 Madell v. Thomas, 74, iv. Makins v. Percy Ibotson (L.R. [1891] & County Bank, e. p.; re Margrett, e. p.; re Soltykoff, 81, vi. Marks v. Beyfus (63 L.T. 733), 16, Meeus's Application, re (60 L.J. Ch. Merthyr Tydvil Local Board v. M. T. 468; 39 W.R. 342), 16, 47, iv. Monk v. Bartram, 93, iv. PAINE V. CHISHOLM, 90, vi. Payne v. Thomas (39 W.R. 240), 16, Pittard v. Oliver, 100, ii. Plant v. Potts, 95, iv. Powell v. Thomas (63 L.T. 812), 16, Pullman v. Hill, 84, i. Patney Overseers v. L. & S.W.R. 90, ii. V. Pyle Works, re (No. 2) (L.R. [1891] QUEENSLAND MERCANTILE AND AGENCY RAISON, e. p.; re R. (60 L.J. Q.B. Read v. Bishop of Lincoln, 79, vi. Reeve v. Gibson, 78, iii. v. Bowerman (60 L.J. M.C. 13), v. Byrde (60 L.J. M.C. 17), 16, v. Cloete, 87, iv. v. Inland Revenue Commis- v. Jackson, 80, iv. v. Kensington Assessment Com. v. London (Bishop), No. 2, 79, v. v. Vreones, 79, i. Ruby, the (63 L.T. 735), 16, 24, ii. SAINT MARTIN'S VESTRY v. GORDON Sandbach & Edmondson, re (63 L.T. Saxby v. Thomas, 104, ii. Schlesinger v. Bedford, 78, ii. v. Turner, 78, i. Scholes v. Brook, 101, i. Scott v. Hanbury, 90, iv. v. Homer (60 L.J. Ch. 238), Seaton, e. p.; re Deerhurst, 73, iii. Sergent v. S., 80, v. Simmons v. London Joint Stock Bank, Slevin v. Hepburn (L.R. [1891] 1 Smith v. Blyth (L.R. [1891] 1 Ch. 337; v. Pyman (60 L.J. Q.B. 127 ; Spence v. Dodsworth, 90, v. Sutton v. Wade (L.R. [1891] 1 Q.B. Harbour Co. v. Plymouth Swift v. 8. (L.R. [1891] P. 129; 60 Talabot, the (63 L.T. 812), 16, 62, iii. Thorley v. Massam, 96, iv. Titia, the, 93, vii. Tobias, e. p. ; re T., 72, v. Turner v. Goldsmith, 87, i. Tyler v. Merchant Taylors' Co. (63 Umbilo, the, 99, iv. VERNON V. WATSON, 80, iii. Vindomora, the, 99, i. Kennelly, 91, iv. WANZER, LIMITED, re, 77, iv. Wenham Co. v. Champion Gas Lamp Wenman v. Lyon, 85, iv. Wentworth v. Hull, &c., Railway, Westacott v. Bevan, 100, iii. Western National Bank of New York Weymouth, &c., Steam Packet Co., re Whiteley and Roberts's Arbitration, Whittaker, e. p.; re Parrott, 73, iv. Wilding v. Bean (64 L.T. 41), 16, Williams v. Frere, 93, v. Williamson v. Hine (L.R. [1891] 1 Witherby v. Rackham, 86, iii. Wolverhampton Corporation v. Bil. ston Commissioners, 105, i. YERBURGH V. Aston, 92, i. ZOUTSPANSBERG PROSPECTING CO., e. p. ; |