The Law Magazine and Review: A Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence

Hammond and Waterton (Arbitra. Keeling v. Smith (L.R. 44 Ch. D. 654),
tion), i.

15, 100,
Handford v. H., 12, vi.

Kenrick v. Lawrence, 9, i.
Harrington, goods of, 20, vi.

Kinahan v. K. (L.R. 45 Ch. D. 78),
Harris v. H., 19, v.

15, 133, iv.
v. Knight (L.R. 15 P.D. 170), Knapp, goods of, 1, i.
15, 145, v.

Knill v. Towse (59 L.J. Q.B. 455;
Haslewood v. Consolidated Credit Co., 63 L.T. 47), 15, 114, iii.

5, ii.
Hasluck, e. p.; re Lehmann, 3, iii. LANDER V. L., 11, vii.
Head and Macdonald, re (63 L.T. 21), Lawrance v. Norreys (38 W.R. 753),
15, 142, iii.

15, 122, ii.
Headington Guardians V. Ipswich Leach, goods of, 30, ii.

Guardians (62 L.T. 786), 15, 127, ii. Lee v. Barne, 15, i.
Henderson v. Bank of Australasia, Lennox Pablishing Co., re, e. p.
7, iii.

Storey, 8, i.
Hepbnrn, e. p. ; re Smith, 3, ii.

Levy, re, e. p. Sheriff of Essex, 3, viii.
Hickley v. Greenwood (L.R. 25

Lewis v. L., 19, i.
Q.B.D. 277; 59 L.J. Q.B. 413), 15, Lickorish, e. p. ; re Wallis (59 L.J.
108, iii.

Q.B. 500), 15, 140, v.
Highgate, the, 24, v.

Lister v. Stubbs (L.R. 45 Ch. D. 1;
H.H. The Nizam's Railway v. Wyatt 59 L.J, Ch. 570; 63 L.T. 75), 15,
(59 L.J. Q.B. 430), 15, 136, iv.

134, ii.
Hobbg v. Hudson (L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 232; Liverpool Household Stores, re, 7, i.
63 L.T. 215), 15, 130, v.

Lodge v. L., 11, vi.
Hopkins v. Smethwick Local Board London Chartered Bank of Australia
(62 L.T. 783), 15, 122, iii.

v. Williams, 8, iji.
Holt and Thompson, re (L.R. 44

Steamship Insurance Co. v.
Ch. D. 492 ; 59 L.J. Ch. 651), 15, Grampian Steamship Co. (62 L.T.
142, ii.

784), 15, 124, i.
Hornbuckle, goods of, 30, v.

Lowe, e. p. ; re L., 3, v.
Huddlestone, goods of, 29, v.
Haghes v. Smallwood, 13, i.

MACDONALD AND HEAD's Trustees, re
Hume v. Somerton, 21, iii.

(59 L.J. Ch. 604), 15, 142, iii.
Huth v. Clarke (L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 391 ; Macdougall v. Knight (63 L.T. 43),
59 L.J. M.C. 120), 15, 122, iv.

15, 121, ii.
Macnee

Persian Investment
INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS V. Corporation (62 L.T. 894), 15,
FORREST, 22, v.

123, iii.
Isle of Cyprus, the (38 W.R. 719), 15, Magneta, the (63 L.T. 114), 15,
130, vi.

139, i.
Issard v. Davies (59 L.J. Ch. 516), Main v. Stark, 6, v.
15, 131, iv.

Manchester Overseers v. Ormskirk

Union (59 L.J. M.C. 103; 38 W.R.
JACKSON V. BRAITAWAITE, 21, i.

778), 15, 127, iv.
James v. Dawson, 28, ii.

Mark Lane, the, 25, iv.
Jay v. Robinson (L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 467 ;

Marks v.

Beyfus, 10, iv.
63 L.T. 174 ; 59 L.J. Q.B. 367), 15, Matheson v. Goodwyn, 18, i.
124, ii.

Maw v. Jones (38 W.R. 718), 15,
Jodrell v. Seale, 29, i.

116, v.
Jones v. Padgett (62 L.T. 934; 38 Meadows v. Taylor (59 L.J. M.C. 99),
W.R. 782) 15, 137, iii.

15, 123, i.
v. Watts (38 W.R. 725), 15, Mellersh v.

Brown, 15, vii.
129, ii.

Metropolitan Coal Consumer's Ag.
e. p.; re J. (L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 285), sociation, re Wainwright's Case,
15, 106, v.
KEARLEY V. THOMPSON (63 L.T. 150), Grieb's Case (59 L.J. Ch. 532), 15,
15, 112, vii.

77, iii.

9, ii.

.te

Proudfoot v. Hart (59 L.J. Q.B. 389;

63 L.T. 171; 38 W.R. 730), 15,

120, vii.
Pare Spirit Co. v. Fowler (L.R. 25

Q.B.D. 235), 15, 133, iii.
Pyle Works, re, 8, iv.

Mexican, &c., Mining Co., e. p.;

Perkins (38 W.R. 710), 15,

107, iv.
Mills v. Charlesworth, 4, iii.
Mitchell v. Simpson (59 L.J. Q.B.

355), 15, 105, iii.
Moore v. Gamgee (L.R. 25 Q.B.D.

244), 15, 114, v.
Morris v. Edwards, 19, iii.
Moxon v. Berkeley Building Society
(59 L.J. Ch. 524), 15, 85, iv.

v. Sheppard (38 W.R. 704),
15, 139, vi.
Muirhead v. M., 23, ii.
Mumford v. Collier, 15, ii.
Municipal Land Society v. Pollington,

7, ii.
Murray v. Watkins, 13, ii.
Murtagh v. Barry (59 L.J. Q.B. 388),

15, 115, i.

NICHOLS V. BAKER (59 L.J. Ch. 661;

62 L.T. 817), 15, 70, iii.
Nield v. Boyd, 17, v.
Norman v. Binnington, 23, v.
North Australian Territory Co., re

(59 L.J. Ch. 654; 63 L.T. 77), 15,

111, iv.
Northampton (Marquis) v. Pollock,

15, iv.
Nunneley v. N., 12, iv.

RADNOR (EARL) SETTLED ESTATES, re,

23, iv.
Raikes v. R. (L.R. 45 Ch. D. 66 ; 59

L.J. Ch. 578; 63 L.T. 23), 15,
104, iji.

V.—., 29, iii.
Railton v. Wood, 6, iv.
Rawlins, re, 28, iv.
Read v. Joannon, 4, v.
Reg. v. Barker (L.R. 25 Q B.D.

213; 59 L.J. M.C. 105), 15,
118, iv.

v. Barnardo (Gossage's Case)
(59 L.J. Q.B. 345), 15, 80 iv.

V. Hereford County Council,
13, iv.

v. Islington Vestry, 5, vi.

v. London (City) Judge (L.R. 25
Q.B.D. 339; 59 L.J. Q.B. 427), 15,
138, iii.

v. London Justices, 11, iii.
v. Paul, 9, iii.

Riley & Campion, 16, ii.

v. Williamson, 19, ii.
Rendall v. Blair, 5, v.
Rendle v. J. E. R. & Co., 27, iii.
Rhymney Railway Co. v. R. Iron Co.

(59 L.J. Q.B. 414; 38 W.R. 764),

15, 136, ii.
Richards v. Butcher, 20, iii.
Rickett v. Sharp, 28, v.
Roberts v. Woodward, 23, i.
Robertson v. Hartopp (59 L.J. Ch.

553), 15, 113, iv.
Robins, goods of, 1, i.
Robinson v. Nevill, 29, iv.
Robson, re (L.R. 45 Ch. D. 71; 59

L.J. Ch. 627), 15, 140, iv.
Rolles v. Newell, 25, vii.
Ruby, the, 24, ii.

OFFICIAL RECEIVER, e. p.; re WATSON

(59 L.J. Q.B. 394 ; 63 L.T. 209),

15, 108, ii.
Onslow v. Inland Revenue Commis.

sioners, 18, iii.
Opera, the, re (62 L.T. 859), 15,

111, v.
O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Rail-

ways, 18, iv.

PALMER, re (59 L.J. Ch. 875; 62

L.T. 778), 15, 140, ji.
Partridge v. General Medical Council

(59 L.J. Q.B. 475 ; 62 L.T. 787;

38 W.R. 729), 15, 117, i.
Penrose v. Manning, 28, i.
Pharmaceutical Society v. Wheeldon

(59 L.J. Q.B. 400), 15, 109, iv.
Phillips v. Homfray, 10, i.

v. Thomas, 16, iii.
Pink v. Fleming, 25, ii.
Pittard v. Oliver, 26, i.
Poppleton, e. p. ; re Locke, 2, iii.
Porter v. De Quetteville, 17, iii.
Portuguese Copper Mines, re, 8, ii.
Pritchard, e. p. ; re Dodds, 3, vii.

SAINT MARTIN'S VESTRY V. GORDON,

14, iv.
Salford (Mayor) v. Lancashire County

Council (L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 384), 15,
122, v.

v. Lever, 21, vi.
Salisbury v. Ridley, 28, vi.
Sargent, re, 10, iii.
Scott, e. p. ; re S., 3, 1.
Scottish, &c., Life Assurance Co., re

(62 L.T. 926), 15, 110, v.

Tucker v. New Brunswick Co. (59

L.J. Ch. 551 ; 62 L.T. 69; 38 W.R.

741), 15, 130, iv.
Tussaud v. T. (L.R. 44 Ch. D. 678 ;

59 L.J. Ch. 631), 15, 111, ii.
URQUHART, e. p. ; re U. (59 L.J. Q.B.

364), 15, 107, v.

Serle v. Fardell (38 W.R. 733), 15,

132, ii.
Serraino v. Campbell, 24, i.
Shaw, &c. v. Timaru Harbour Board,

25, iv.
Sheffield Building Society v. Aizle-

wood (L.R. 44 Ch. D. 412), 15,

32, iv.
Shepherd v. Hirsch, 21, ii.
Shipwright v. Clements, 18, ii.
Sibun v. Pearce, 5, iv.
Skegg, e. p. ; re 8., 4, i.
Slinn, goods of, 30, iii.
Smith, e. p. ; re 8., 2, v.
Smith, Pinsent & Co., re (59 L.J.

Ch. 599), 15, 139, vii.
Smithett v. Hesketh (59 L.J. Ch.
567; 62 L.T. 802; 38 W.R. 693),

15, 126, i.
Snelling v. S., 19, iv.
Snowden v. Baynes (L.R. 24 Q.B.D.

193; 38 W.R. 744), 15, 124, vi.
Spanish General Agency Corporation

v. Spanish Corporation, 19, vii.
Stakesby, the, 24, iv.
Standard Cement Co., re (62 L.T.

822), 15, 112, iv.
Stockley v. Parsons, 14, i.
Stoy v. Rees (63 L.T.49), 15, 133, vii.
Swift v. S., 12, vii.

VADALA V. LAWES, 11, ii.
Van Cutsem, goods of, 30, i.
Van Gelder v. Sowerby Bridge Flour

Society (L.R. 44 Ch. D. 374; 59
L.J. Ch. 588 ; 63 LT. 132), 15,

126, vii.
Vaughan, e. p.; re Dodds, 3, vii.

WADSWORTH's Trust, re, 20, v.
Walker v. W., 2, ii.
Walsh v. Browne, 28, ii.
Warminster Local Board v. Wiltshire

County Council (L.R. 25 Q.B.D.
450 ; 59 L.J. Q.B. 434; 62 L.T.

902), 15, 122, vi.
Warren v. W., 12, v.
Warter v. W., 12, iii.
Watson re;

e. p. Official Receiver
(59 L.J. Q.B. 394), 15, 108, iii.
Weller v. W., 12, i.
West Ham Guardians v. St. Giles's

Overseers, 17, ii.
West Lancashire Railway, re, 22, iii.
Whitby v. Mitchell (62 L.T. 771), 15,

87, v.
Whittaker v. Kershaw (62 L.T. 776),
15, 133, ii.

10, v. ; 13, vi.
Williams v. Davies (L.R. 44 Ch. D.

484), 15, 144, iii.
Windhill Local Board v. Vint, 8, vii.
Winsford Local Roard v. Cheshire

Lines Committee (59 L.J. Q.B.

372), 15, 93, iii.
Wragg v. Small, 29, i.
Wright v. Mills, 21, v.

TATE v. T., 30, iv.
Tasmania, the (63 L.T. 1), 15, 139, ii.
Taylor v. Russell (62 L.T. 923), 15,
125, iv.

v. Soper, 15, v.

> goods of, 29, vi.
Tendring Guardians Dowton

(59 L.J. Ch. 528 ; 62 L.T. 805), 15,

123, ii.
Thompson & Holt re (59 L.J. Ch.

651), 15, 142, ii.
Thynne v. Shove (59 L.J. Ch. 509 ;

62 L.T. 803), 15, 118, iii.
Tilbury v. Silva, 21, iv.
Tomlinson v. L. & N.W.R., 22, ii.

INDEX
of the cases reported during November, December, 1890, and

January, 1891.

Where a case has already been given in the Digest for a preceding
quarter, the additional report is given after the name of the case,
with a reference to the volume of the Digest in which it first
appeared, the thick number being the number of the volume.

ABRAHAMS v. DEAKIN, 49, vi.
Accomac, the, 61, iv.
Adams v. A., 69, ii.
Addison v. Topp, 65, vi.
Agricultural Hotel Co., re, 41, v.
Alabama, &c., Railway Co., re, 42, i.
Alden v. Beckley, 57, iii.
Anderson v. Hamlin (59 L.J. M.C.

151), 16, 11, i.
Anderton v. Milner, re, 46, iv.
Andrew v. Cooper, 56, v. ; 65, v.
Angus v. Clifford, 41, iii.
Apollinaris Co.'s Trade Mark, re,

54, iii.
Argentine Gold Fields, e. p. ; re Low,

Barney v. Joshua Stubbs, Limited,

40, iv.
Bartlett v. Charles, 33, iii.
Barton v. Bank of New South Wales,

50, v.
Bass v. Gregory (59 L.J. Q.B. 574),

16, 10, ii.
Batten, &c., v. Dartmouth Harbour

Commissioners (L.R. 45 Ch. D. 612;

59 L.J. Ch. 700),15, 125, iii.
Beckett v. Tower Assets Co., 38, iii.
Bedford v. Teal, 40, ii.
Belcher v. Williams, 52, iii.
Bell v. Antwerp, &c., Line, 57, vii.
Bell Cox v. Hakes, 45, ii.
Bellamy v. Debenham (L.R. 45 Ch. D.
481), 16, 27, v.

-- v. Wells, 51, vi.
Berridge v. Turner, 39, iv.
Bignold v. B., 34, ii.
Bilke v. Roper, 49, ii.
Bills v. Tatham, 68, ii.
Bird v. Davey, 38, v.
Bishop v. Balkis Consolidated Co.

(63 L.T. 316), 15, 137, iv.

37, ii.

Ashley, goods of, 34, v.
Ashworth v. Roberts (L.R. 45 Ch. D.
623; 60 L.J. Ch. 27; 39 W.R.

170), 16, 16, iv.
A.-G. v. Edwards, 39, i.

v. Morgan, 44, i.

v. Woodall (L.R. 45 Ch. D.
266; 39 W.R. 58), 16, 20, ix.
Aron, the, & the Thomas Joliffe,

57, iv.
Aylesford, E., v. Earl Poulett, 63, iv.

BAIRD V. WELLS (63 L.T. 312; 39

W.R. 61), 16, 6, i.
Baker v. Rawson, 64, iv.
Banque d'Hochelaga v. Murray (L.R.

15 App. Cas. 414 ; 59 L.J. P.C.

102), 16, 6, iii.
Barnett v. King, 36, iv.

60, i.
Blair v. North British, &c., Insurance

Co., 54, i.
Blyth v. Fladgate, 63, iii.
Board of Trade e. p.; re Nicholson,
36, v.

e. p. ; re Griffin, 37, v.
Booth v. F'errett (59 L.J. M.C. 136 ;

63 L.T. 346), 15, 110, ii.

« Previous Continue »

Books

The Law Magazine and Review: A Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence, Volume 16