 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1918 - 476 pages
...where we said : In the ordinary case of parties competing under the same mark in the same market, it is correct to say that prior appropriation settles the...question. But where two parties independently are emlpoying the same mark upon goods of the same class, but in separate markets wholly remote the one... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1919 - 464 pages
...say that prior appropriation settles the question. But where two parties independently are emipoyiug the same mark upon goods of the same class, but in...appropriation is legally insignificant, unless at least it appear that the second adopter has selected the mark with some design inimical to the interests of... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1916 - 364 pages
...Trade-Marks, 6, 7, 8; Ownership; Unfair Competition. EXTENT OF MAKKKT. — Where two parties independeatly are employing the same mark upon goods of the same class, but in separate markets wholly remote from one another, the question of priority of adoption of the mark is legally insignificant unless... | |
 | Harry Dwight Nims - Competition, Unfair - 1917 - 968 pages
...is presented. On this point the Supreme Court in Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf (supra) said: "But where two parties independently are employing...same class, but in separate markets wholly remote from each the one from the other, the question of prior appropriation is legally insignificant, unless... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - Copyright - 1917 - 366 pages
...Opposition to Registration of Trade-Marks, 6, 7, 8; Ownership; Unfair Competition. EXTENT OF MARKET. — Where two parties independently are employing the...same class, but in separate markets wholly remote from one another, the question of priority of adoption of the mark is legally insignificant unless... | |
 | Appellate courts - 1918 - 756 pages
...when he said: "In the ordinary case of parties competing under the same mark In the same market, It Is correct to say that prior appropriation settles the...prior appropriation Is legally Insignificant, unless a£ least it appears that the second adopter has selected the mark with some design Inimical to the... | |
 | Law - 1920 - 446 pages
...cases decided. In the ordinary case of parties competing under the same mark in the same market, it is correct to say that prior appropriation settles the...appropriation is legally insignificant; unless at least it appear that the second adopter has selected the mark with some design inimical to the interests of... | |
| |
In the ordinary case of parties competing under the same mark in the same market, it is correct to say that prior appropriation settles the question. But where two parties independently are employing the same mark upon goods of the same class, but in... 
