Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Until further notice:

Mr. Fallon with Mr. McCloy.

Mr. Moss with Mr. Harvey of Michigan.
Mr. Sisk with Mr. Griffin.

Mr. Helstoski with Mrs. May.

Mr. Roosevelt with Mr. Lindsay.
Mr. Aspinall with Mr. Baring.

Mr. Andrews of Alabama with Mr. Cameron.

Mr. Casey with Mr. Holland.
Mrs. Kelly with Mr. Kornegay.
Mr. Kluczynski with Mr. Ryan.
Mr. Conyers with Mr. Culver.

Mr. Landrum with Mrs. Griffiths.
Mr. Mills with Mr. Gallagher.
Mr. Toll with Mr. Whitten.

Mr. Wright with Mr. Johnson of Oklahoma. Mr. Thompson of Texas with Mr. Farnsley. Mr. Rivers of South Carolina with Mr. Weltner.

Mr. Young with Mr. Bonner.
Mr. Hardy with Mr. Thomas.

Mr. TALCOTT.

Mr. Speaker, I have a live pair with the gentleman from New York [Mr. MULTER]. If he were here, he would vote "yea." I voted "no." Therefore, I withdraw my vote of "no" and vote "present."

The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

REQUEST FOR GENERAL LEAVE TO EXTEND REMARKS

Mr. POWELL. Mr. Speaker, I ask

unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to extend their remarks on the two resolutions, House Resolution 506 and House Resolution 478, which have been passed and to include pertinent and extraneous material.

The SPEAKER. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from New York?

Mr. CURTIS. Mr. Speaker, reserving the right to object, I would observe that inasmuch as there was not any debate, it would not be fitting to have the RECORD indicate that there was, and for that reason I object.

The SPEAKER. Objection is heard. Mr. POWELL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to extend their remarks on the resolu

tion just adopted by the House, House Resolution 478.

Mr. FLYNT. Mr. Speaker, I object. The SPEAKER. Objection is heard.

ADJUSTING RATES OF BASIC COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ESTABLISHING FEDERAL SALARY REVIEW COMMISSION

Mr. UDALL. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to the provisions of clause 23, rule XI, by direction of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, I call up the resolution (H. Res. 536) providing for consideration of H.R. 10281, which has been pending before the Committee on Rules for more than 21 calendar days without being reported by the said committee.

The SPEAKER. The Clerk will report the resolution.

The Clerk read as follows:

H. RES. 536

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to move that the House resolve itself into the Committee

of the Whole House on the State of the Union for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 10281) to adjust the rates of basic compensation of certain officers and employees in the Federal Government, to establish the Federal Salary Review Commission, and for other purposes. After general debate, which shall be confined to the bill, and shall continue not to exceed four hours, to be equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service, the bill shall be read for amendment under the fiveminute rule. At the conclusion of the consideration of the bill for amendment, the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted, and the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.

Mr. UDALL. Mr. Speaker, the resolution now pending before the House would make in order the consideration of the bill, H.R. 10281, the Federal salary adjustment act of 1965. This bill was reported from our committee on August 16 by a vote of 20 to 3. It represents a full month of hearings and most careful consideration by our committee of this very comprehensive subject.

Mr. Speaker, this is a good bill and the pending resolution would provide for

4 hours of general debate to be equally

divided and the rule is an open rule.

At this late hour I shall not go into the details of this very comprehensive legislation, but I urge Members of the House to support the resolution and to adopt it this afternoon.

Mr. SMITH of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield for a question on the bill itself?

[blocks in formation]

I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Alabama [Mr. BUCHANAN], who has distinguished himself by his concentration on our problem.

Mr. BUCHANAN. Mr. Speaker, I merely wish to state that, with the exception of the congressional pay raise feature, about which we had an honest difference, and which we hope will be resolved in an amendment, the bill did have strong bipartisan support. I concur in the judgment of the distinguished subcommittee chairman. With the exception of the congressional pay raise feature, it is a good bill.

Mr. CORBETT. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from North Carolina [Mr. BROYHILL] for 3 minutes.

Mr. BROYHILL of North Carolina.

Mr. Speaker, it has been a long night. It is not my purpose to prolong the discussion. It is usual when these resolutions are being considered that some explanation of the bill be made. Tonight we do not have the time. It is late. As the gentleman from Arizona has well stated, the bill does include a pay raise for all Federal workers. The first stage in the bill as written provides a 41⁄2 percent increase. A second stage increase

is written in the bill, which is known

as the automatic increase for next year. Actually, I believe no one really knows exactly how much that increase would amount to. Estimates only, are available.

The fact is, too, that no further consideration would be in order by this Congress for that second stage increase. It is also a well-known fact that there is opposition to this piece of legislation Mr. UDALL. I yield to the gentleman by the administration. The views of the from Virginia.

Mr. SMITH of Virginia. I would like to inquire whether this is the bill that contained a provision by which the Con

administration on this bill are well

known.

In view of the inflationary spiral that is taking place in this country, the oppo

sition by the administration should not be taken lightly.

As the gentleman from Virginia [Mr. SMITH] has brought out, it should be recognized by all Members that there would be an increase in the bill for Members of the Congress. There, again, the amount of the increase is not itemized.

It is also very apparent from the conversations that I have had with a number of Members and a number of pieces of mail that I have had come across my desk that that there will be numerous amendments offered to the bill when it is considered in the Committee of the Whole. I only wish that we had had the time available in our discussion on this resolution to discuss, comment, and debate some of the amendments which might be offered.

It is not my purpose tonight to oppose this rule just for opposition's sake. I would hope that all Members will make it a point to study the details of the bill, read the committee report, together with the minority and additional views. This legislation should be considered when it is brought before the House, with careful deliberation. Changes that that should be made should be accepted and then the entire bill voted up or down on it merits.

Mr. CORBETT. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia [Mr. BROYHILL] a former member of our committee.

Mr. BROYHILL of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I am mighty pleased to follow the gentleman from North Carolina [Mr. BROYHILL), who happens to be my cousin. On a previous occasion I have said in a joking way that I claim him as close kinfolk when we agree on what is good Federal employee legislation. When we disagree on that subject then we threaten to refer to each other as distant relatives.

Mr. Speaker, earlier this evening the gentleman from Arizona [Mr. UDALL] who happens to be a good friend of the Federal employee and has been such a great leader in the fight for good Federal employee legislation, took the floor to state that some of us on this side who objected to the procedures of today-in words to this effect-were jeopardizing the possibility of considering a Federal employees pay bill this year.

I do not question the prerogatives of the leadership in the way they want to schedule legislation. I do not question the motives of the gentleman from Arizona [Mr. UDALL]. But I do not believe it is necessary for the gentleman from Virginia or anyone else on this side of the aisle to have to defend his position on or support of Federal employee legislation.

Certainly my support of the bill for which we are considering a rule now is known. My position on parliamentary procedures earlier today has nothing to do with my position on this legislation. I believe the gentleman knows that, and the implication of the remarks made earlier today was in error.

Mr. CORBETT. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 3 minutes.

I should like to say to the gentleman from Arizona [Mr. UDALL] that the rule provides for 4 hours of general debate, and the bill will be open for amendment under the 5-minute rule. This will give us ample time to consider all of the administration objections to the bill. It will give us every opportunity to amend the bill in accordance with the wishes of the House.

Therefore, I feel there is no reason in the world why this rule should not be adopted.

In view of the administration's expressed position that along with the bill this year there will be salary adjustments next year, we would all be well advised to adopt a bill this year and amend it as we see fit, and then make such adjustments next year as conditions warrant. Is that the understanding of the gentleman from Arizona?

Mr. UDALL. I did not fully understand the inquiry of the gentleman. If stand the inquiry of the gentleman. If he will state it again I shall be happy to comment.

The bill as written has the October 1, 1965, salary adjustment for all Federal employees; classified, postal, and others. It also has a formula raise effective October 1, 1966, a year from now. That is in the bill. I support both of those provisions in the bill.

I understand that amendments will be offered to knock out the 1966 raise. I believe there are many good arguments why those should not be stricken out. These are things we can debate, discuss, and resolve when the bill comes before the House.

[blocks in formation]

Mr. UDALL. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to extend their remarks on the resolution now before the House.

The SPEAKER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

There was no objection.

Mr. UDALL. Mr. Speaker, I move the previous question on the resolution. The SPEAKER. Without objection, the previous question is ordered. There was no objection.

The SPEAKER. The question is on the resolution.

Mr. GERALD R. FORD. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. Mr. HALL. Mr. Speaker, a parliamentary inquiry.

The SPEAKER. The gentleman will state it.

Mr. HALL. Mr. Speaker, is the vote on the previous question?

The SPEAKER. No. The vote is on the adoption of the resolution.

Mr. HALL. The gentleman moved the previous question and the yeas and nays were asked on that motion.

The SPEAKER. The Chair will state that the previous question was ordered by unanimous consent. Then came the question on the adoption of the resolution, and on that the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. GERALD R. FORD] asked for the yeas and nays. Is the Chair's statement correct?

Mr. GERALD R. FORD. Mr. Speaker, as I best recollect it, I believe that the Chair put the motion on the previous question.

The SPEAKER. By unanimous consent.

Mr. GERALD R. FORD. That is correct.

The SPEAKER. Then the gentleman from Michigan demanded the yeas and nays on the adoption of the resolution. Mr. GERALD R. FORD.

rect.

That is cor

The SPEAKER. That is the matter before the House now.

The question was taken; and there were-yeas 289, nays 84, not voting 59, as follows:

[blocks in formation]

Bolling
Bow
Brademas
Brock
Brooks
Broomfield
Brown, Calif.
Broyhill, N.C.
Broyhill, Va.
Buchanan
Burke

Burton, Calif.

Burton, Utah Byrne, Pa. Cabell

[blocks in formation]

Dow

Dulski

Hansen, Iowa
Hansen, Wash.
Harsha

Hathaway
Hawkins

Hechler
Henderson
Herlong

Hicks

Holifield

Horton

Hosmer

Howard

Hungate

Huot

Hutchinson

Ichord

Duncan, Oreg. Irwin

Dwyer

Dyal

Edmondson

Edwards, Calif.

Ellsworth

Evans, Colo.

Farbstein

Farnum

Fascell

Feighan

Findley

Fino Flood Fogarty

Foley

Ford,

William D.

Fraser

Frelinghuysen
Friedel
Fulton, Pa.
Fulton, Tenn.
Garmatz

Giaimo

Gibbons

Gilbert

Gray

Jacobs

Jarman

Jennings

Joelson

Johnson, Calif.

Johnson, Pa.

Jones, Ala.

Karsten
Karth

Kastenmeier

Kee

Keith

King, Calif.
King, N.Y.
King, Utah
Krebs
Kunkel

Leggett
Long, Md.
Love
McCarthy
McDade
McDowell
McFall
McGrath

McVicker

Macdonald

MacGregor

Gilligan

Gonzalez Grabowski

Machen

Mackay

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Martin, Ala. Martin, Mass.

Green, Oreg.

Andrews,

Griffin

George W.

Griffiths

May

Ashbrook

Harvey, Ind.

Mills

Aspinall

Harvey, Mich.

Moss

Baring

Hays

Multer

Bolton

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Mr. Hébert with Mr. Pirnie.

Mr. Kirwan with Mrs. May.

Mrs. Kelly with Mrs. Bolton.
Mr. Celler with Mr. Adair.

Mr. Toll with Mr. Harvey of Michigan.
Mr. Culver with Mr. Martin of Alabama.
Mr. Ryan with Mr. McClory.

Mr. Kluczynski with Mr. Griffin.
Mr. Helstoski with Mr. Brady.

Mr. Fallon with Mr. Harvey of Indiana.
Mr. George W. Andrews with Mr. Ashbrook.
Mr. Daddario with Mr. Derwinski.

Mr. Mills with Mr. Smith of Virginia.

Mr. Multer with Mr. Gallagher.
Mrs. Griffiths with Mr. Thomas.

Mr. Landrum with Mr. Carey.

Mr. Casey with Mr. Baring.
Mr. Hays with Mr. Roosevelt.
Mr. Steed with Mr. Moss.

Mr. Weltner with Mr. McMillan.
Mr. Cameron with Mr. Conyers.
Mr. Kornegay with Mr. Sisk.
Mr. Aspinall with Mr. Holland.
Mr. Watts with Mrs. Green of Oregon.
Mr. Wright with Mr. Farnsley.

Mr. Johnson of Oklahoma with Mr. Whitten.

Mr. Thompson of Texas with Mr. Bonner. Mr. HALEY and Mr. BURLESON changed their votes from "yea" to "nay." The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.

A motion to reconsider was laid on on the table.

COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE The SPEAKER laid before the House the following communication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives: OFFICE OF THE CLERK, HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Washington, D.C., September 10, 1965. The Honorable the SPEAKER, House of Representatives.

SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith a sealed envelope addressed to the Speaker of the House of Representatives from the President of the United States, received in the Clerk's Office at 4:15 p.m., September 10, 1965, and said to contain H.R. 3329, an act to incorporate the Youth Councils on Civic Affairs, and for other purposes, and a veto message thereon.

Respectfully yours,

RALPH R. ROBERTS, Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives.

INCORPORATE THE YOUTH COUN-
CILS ON CIVIC AFFAIRS-VETO
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES

The SPEAKER laid before the House the following veto message from the President of the United States:

To the House of Representatives:

I return herewith, without my approval, H.R. 3329, a bill to incorporate the Youth Councils on Civic Affairs, and for other purposes.

The committee reports indicate that this organization had its origin in Jacksonville, Fla., in 1962, and that it was incorporated under Florida law in March 1963. Its general purposes are to promote youth activities youth aware of their civic responsibilities. Obviously, these worthwhile purposes are not the basis of my concern with this bill.

The Clerk announced the following for the good of the community and to make

pairs:

Mr. Keogh with Mr. Martin of Massachusetts.

For some time I have been concerned with the question of whether we were granting Federal charters to private organizations on a case-by-case basis without the benefit of clearly established standards and criteria as to eligibility. Worthy civic, patriotic, and philanthropic organizations can and do incorporate their activities under State law. It seems obvious that Federal charters should be granted, if at all, only on a selective basis and that they should meet some national interest standard.

Other questions indicate the desirability of further study of this matter. For example, does the granting of Federal charters to a limited number of organizations discriminate against similar and worthy organizations and possibly stifle their growth? Should federally charted corporations be more carefully supervised by an agency of the Federal Government? Does Federal rather than State chartering result in differences in the legal or tax status of the corporation, and are any differences appropriate ones?

I note that last year Congress enacted Public Law 88-504, at the recommendation of the General Accounting Office, to provide common standards of auditing and reporting for federally chartered corporations covered by title 36 of the United States Code. This reflected a concern similar to mine that proper standards and criteria be established in this area.

I hope that the Judiciary Committees will find it possible to make a comprehensive study of the questions I have outlined above. I am asking the Department of Justice and the Bureau of the Budget to explore these questions also and to make appropriate recommendations to me.

In the light of these concerns and without reflection in any way on the worthy purposes of the organization which would be incorporated by this bill, I feel constrained to withhold my approval from H.R. 3329 at this time.

LYNDON B. JOHNSON.

THE WHITE HOUSE, September 10, 1965. The SPEAKER. The objections of the President will be spread at large upon the Journal.

Without objection, the bill and message will be referred to the Committee on the District of Columbia.

Mr. HALL. Mr. Speaker, I object. The SPEAKER. To what does the gentleman object?

Mr. HALL. I object to the reference of the veto message to the committee.

AMERICAN YOUTH

Mr. CALLAWAY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to extend my remarks at this point in the RECORD.

The SPEAKER. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from Georgia?

There was no objection.

Mr. CALLAWAY. Mr. Speaker, too often these days when we think of the term "American youth," we associate it with the much publicized high school dropouts, or unkempt beatniks marching or sitting in protest of anything that will bring them attention. Unfortunately, the picture adds up to one of irresponsibility and bad judgment on the part of our youth. Mr. Speaker, this is simply not the case, for although these

elements do get the most publicity, there is another and brighter side of the coin. Throughout this country young men and women of the highest character are constantly performing jobs that contribute to the good of our Nation.

I have had an unusual opportunity to see many of these young people in action in the military. As part of the Defense Department's orientation program for freshmen Congressmen, I have had the good fortune to visit Fort Benning, Ga.; Fort Campbell, Ky.; the nuclear submarine Nathaniel Greene; the aircraft carrier Wasp; and most recently Offit Air Force Base, Headquarters of the Strategic Air Command, the North American Air Defense Command, and the Air Force Academy. On these tours I was particularly impressed to see the type of jobs being performed by young men of 18 and 19. I saw them at the controls of the submarine, launching jets off the carrier, manning the apparatus through which SAC could be alerted, and in many other tremendously responsible positions. In each case, these young men were doing excellent jobs. America has always been proud of its youth. Yet at no time in our history could we be more proud than we are today, for despite the bad publicity of a few, the many continue to uphold the highest traditions of American citizenship.

ADJOURNMENT

Mr. ALBERT. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.

The motion was agreed to; accordingly (at 12 o'clock and 31 minutes a.m., Tuesday, September 14, 1965), the House adjourned until 12 o'clock noon.

EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS,

ETC.

Under clause 2 of rule XXIV, executive communications were taken from the Speaker's table and referred as follows:

1569. A letter from the Administrator, Veterans' Administration, transmitting a report of a violation consisting of an overobligation tions, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 665 (i) (2); to of the amount permitted by agency regulathe Committee on Appropriations.

1570. A letter from the Assistant Secretary of the Interior, transmitting a report of tort claims paid in the fiscal year 1964, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2673; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

1571. A letter from the Administrator, General Services Administration, transmitting a report of tort claims during fiscal year 1965, pursuant to title 28, section 2672, U.S.C.; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

1572. A letter from the Acting Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, transmitting a report on tort claims paid during the fiscal year 1965, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2673; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

1573. A letter from the Assistant Secretary of the Interior, transmitting a report of an application for a supplemental loan by the

CONFERENCE REPORT (H. REPT. Hooper Irrigation Co., of Hooper, Utah, pur

NO. 978)

Mr. MILLS submitted a conference report and statement on the bill (H.R. 5768), to extend for an additional temporary period the existing suspension of duties on certain classifications of yarn or silk.

CONFERENCE REPORT (H. REPT. NO. 979)

Mr. MILLS submitted a conference report and statement on the bill (H.R. 7969) to correct certain errors in the Tariff Schedules of the United States.

SENATE BILL AND CONCURRENT

RESOLUTIONS REFERRED

A bill and concurrent resolutions of the Senate of the following titles were taken from the Speaker's table and, under the rule, referred as follows:

S. 1310. An act relating to the National Museum of the Smithsonian Institution;

S. Con. Res. 46. A concurrent resolution to authorize placing temporarily in the rotunda of the Capitol the statue of the late Senator Dennis Chavez;

S. Con. Res. 47. A concurrent resolution to

authorize the acceptance by Congress of the statue of the late Senator Dennis Chavez; and

S. Con. Res. 48. A concurrent resolution to

print as a Senate document the proceedings of the presentation, dedication, and ceptance by Congress of the statue of the late Senator Dennis Chavez. To the Committee on House Administration.

suant to section 4(c), 71 Stat. 48; to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs.

1574. A letter from the Acting Secretary. Treasury Department, transmitting a report of operations by Federal departments and establishments in connection with the bonding of officers and employees, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1965, pursuant to section 14(c) (6 U.S.C. 14); to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

1575. A letter from the Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, transmitting a report on funds used to provide additional research laboratory space at the University of Denver, Denver, Colo., pursuant to 78 Stat. 310, 311; to the Committee on Science and Astronautics.

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES ON PUB

LIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS Under clause 2 of rule XIII, pursuant to the order of the House of September 9, 1965, the following bill was reported on September 10, 1965:

Mr. HARRIS: Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. H.R. 10874. A bill to amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937 to eliminate the provisions which reduce spouses' annuities by the amount of certain monthly benefits, to increase the base on which railroad retirement benefits and taxes are computed, and to change the rates of tax under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act; with amendment (Rept. No. 976). Referred

to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES ON PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS Under clause 2 of rule XIII, reports of committees were delivered to the Clerk

for printing and reference to the proper calendar, as follows:

Mr. THOMPSON of New Jersey: Joint

Committee on Disposition of Executive Papers. Report pursuant to (63 Stat. 377) without amendment (Rept. No. 977). Ordered to be printed.

Mr. MILLS: Committee of conference. H.R. 5768. A bill to extend for an additional temporary period the existing suspension of duties on certain classifications of yarn of silk (Rept. No. 978). Ordered to be printed. Mr. MILLS: Committee of conference. H.R. 7969. A bill to correct certain errors in the Tariff Schedules of the United States (Rept. No. 979). Ordered to be printed.

Mr. RIVERS of Alaska: Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. H.R. 8035. A bill to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to accept a donation of property in the county of Suffolk, State of New York, known as the William Floyd Estate, for addition to the Fire Island National Seashore, and for other purposes; with amendment (Rept. No. 980). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.

Mr. RIVERS of Alaska: Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. H.R. 9417. A bill to revise the boundary of Jewel Cave National Monument in the State of South Dakota, and for other purposes; without amendment (Rept. No. 981). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.

Mr. RIVERS of Alaska: Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. H.R. 6515. A bill to supplement the act of October 6, 1964, establishing the Lewis and Clark Trail Commission, and for other purposes; with amendment (Rept. No. 982). Referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union.

Mr. SELDEN: Committee on Foreign Affairs. House Resolution 560. Resolution to express the sense of the House of Representatives declaring the policy of the United States relative to the intervention of the international communistic movement in the Western Hemisphere; without amendment (Rept. No. 983). Referred to the House Calendar.

PUBLIC BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS Under clause 4 of rule XXII, public bills and resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

By Mr. BOGGS:

H.R. 10998. A bill to continue for a temporary period the existing suspension of duty on heptanoic acid; to the Committee on Ways and Means.

By Mr. BYRNES of Wisconsin:

H.R. 10999. A bill to provide for appointment by the Postmaster General of postmasters at first-, second-, and third-class post offices; to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

By Mr. DULSKI:

H.R. 11000. A bill to provide for the establishment of the Hudson Highlands National Scenic Riverway in the State of New York, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs.

By Mr. ERLENBORN:

H.R. 11001. A bill to establish the national water resources trust fund; to the Committee on Banking and Currency.

By Mr. FINO:

H.R. 11002. A bill to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to regulate the transportation, sale, and handling of dogs and cats intended to be used for purposes of research or experimentation, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Agriculture.

[blocks in formation]

table fibers (except cotton); to the Committee on Ways and Means.

By Mr. KING of New York:

H.R. 11030. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to allow a credit against income tax to individuals for certain expenses incurred in providing higher education; to the Committee on Ways and Means.

By Mr. MORRISON:

H.R. 11031. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 to treat sintering or burning as a mining process in the case of shale, clay, and slate used or sold for use, as lightweight concrete aggregates; to the Committee on Ways and Means.

By Mr. ROONEY of New York: H.R. 11032. A bill to provide for the establishment of the Hudson Highlands National Scenic Riverway in the State of New York, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs.

By Mr. TODD:

H.R. 11033. A bill to amend section 18(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; to the Committee on Banking and Currency.

By Mr. ROSENTHAL:

H. Con. Res. 506. Concurrent resolution to establish a Joint Committee on Central Intelligence; to the Committee on Rules.

By Mr. DOW:

H. Con. Res. 507. Concurrent resolution to recognize the World Law Day; to the Committee on Foreign Affairs.

By Mr. BATES:

H. Con. Res. 508. Concurrent resolution au

thorizing the President to designate the 8day period beginning October 10, 1965, as Canberra Week; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. MOELLER:

H. Res. 577. Resolution relative to the Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee making an investigation and study of certain policies of the Federal Communications Commission; to the Committee on Rules.

PRIVATE BILLS AND RESOLUTIONS

Under clause 1 of rule XXII, private bills and resolutions were introduced and severally referred as follows:

By Mr. BELL:

H.R. 11034. A bill for the relief of Clyde Bruce Aitchison, Jr.; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. BROYHILL of Virginia (by request):

H.R. 11035. A bill for the relief of Eleanore W. Ward; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

H.R. 11036. A bill for the relief of Dr. Milagros Grageda Thompson; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

H.R. 11037. A bill for the relief of Adelia Augusta Fernandes; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

H.R. 11038. A bill for the relief of Mrs. Edna A. Bettendorf; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. BUCHANAN:

H.R. 11039. A bill for the relief of Nimet Allah Odeh Elias Mashni; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. CHAMBERLAIN:

H.R. 11040. A bill for the relief of Michelle Marie Kendall; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. HALPERN:

H.R. 11041. A bill for the relief of Mr. and Mrs. Imre Emil Bella, and Gustavo Bella; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. MATHIAS:

H.R. 11042. A bill for the relief of Panagiota and Konstantinos Karras; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

« PreviousContinue »