...prescribed regulations, If he found It prac«•tlcable to do so. • 'Without questioning the doctrine that debates In congress are not appropriate sources of Information from which to discover the meaning of a statute passed by that body (U. S. v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n, 166 U. 8. 318, 17 Sup. Ct. 540),...

...other acts, from the language used therein. There is, too, a general acquiescence in the doctrine that debates in Congress are not appropriate sources of...of the language of a statute passed by that body. United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 91 IL S. 72, 79; Aldridge v. Williams, 3 How. 9, 24,...

...: To be contingently po«•Ible ; as. It may be ; you may get off, although you do not deaerra it The reason is that It is impossible to determine with...construction was put upon an act by the members of the legislative body that passed it by resorticg to the speeches of individual members thereof. Those...

...into a contract in restraint of trade and commerce, like the one which forms the subject of this suit. Debates in Congress are not appropriate sources of...the language of a statute passed by that body. The prohibitory provisions of the said act of July 2, 1890, apply to all contracts in restraint of interstate...

...other acts from the language used therein. There is, too, a general acquiescence in the doctrine that debates in Congress are not appropriate sources of...of the language of a statute passed by that body. (United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 91 US 72, at 79; Aldridge v. Williams, 3 Howard,...

...a contract in restraint of ' trade and commerce, like the one which forms the subject of this suit. Debates in Congress are not appropriate sources of information, from which to discover the meaning ot^ the language of a statute passed by that body. The prohibitory provisions of the sa« act of July...

...other acts, from the language used therein. There is, too, a general acquiescence in the doctrine that debates in congress are not appropriate sources of information from which to discover the moaning of the language of a statute passed by that body. (United States v. Union Pacific Railroad...

...Justice Gray and Mr. Justice Shiras dissenting. 5. There is a general acquiescence in the doctrine that debates in congress are not appropriate sources of information from which to discover the meaning of language in a statute passed by that body. 6. The contracts, combinations, etc. , in restraint of interstate...

...earlier cases in that court are cited, aud the following language is used by Mr. Justice Peckham : "Debates in Congress are not appropriate sources of...certainty what construction was put upon an act by tbe members of a legislative body that passed it by resorting to the epeechee of individual members...

...regulations if he found it practicable to do so. Opinion ot the Court. 'Without questioning the doctrine that debates in Congress are not appropriate sources of information from which to discover the meaning of a statute passed by that body, United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 US 290, 318,...