the following subjects:-(1) Institutes of Gaius and Institutes of Justinian; (2) The Digest 41, title], "De acquirendo rerum dominio"; and title 2, "De acquirendo vel amittenda possessione"; (3) History of Roman law; (4) Principles of jurisprudence, with special reference to the writings of Bentham, Austin, and Maine; (5) Elements of international law; (6) Principles of private international law. Candidates for honours will be examined in subjects numbered 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Candidates for a pass certificate will be examined in the Institutes of Justinian, books 1 and 2; book 3, title 13, to the end of the book; book 4, titles 1 to 5 inclusive. The examiner in the law of real and personal property will examine in the following subjects :-The creation, devolution, and disposition inter vivos, and by will, of estates, and interests in and powers over real and personal property, including estates and interests, by way of statutory use, and of trust. Candidates for a pass certificate will be examined in the elements of the foregoing subjects; candidates for honours will have a higher examination. The examiner in common law will examine in the following subjects:-(1) The law of contracts; (2) The law of torts; (3) Criminal law; (4) The procedure in the common law divisions of the High Court of Justice. Candidates for a pass certificate will be examined on general and elementary principles of law; and from candidates for honours the examiner will require a more advanced knowledge of the - application of those principles, and a knowledge of leading decisions. The examiner in equity will examine in the following subjects:-(1) Trusts; (2) Specific performance; (3) Partnership; (4) Mistake and accident. Candidates for honours will be examined in all the above-mentioned subjects. Candidates for a pass certificate in those numbered 1 and 2 only. The examiners in constitutional law and legal history will examine in the following books and subjects:-(1) Stubb's Constitutional History of England; (2) Hallam's Constitutional History; (3) Broom's Constitutional Law; (4) The Principal State Trials of the Stuart Period; (5) the concluding chapter of Blackstone's Commentaries, being that "On the Progress of the Laws of England." Candidates for honours will be examined in all the above-mentioned books and subjects; candidates for a pass certificate will be examined in No. 1 and No. 3 only, or in No. 2 and No. 3 only, of the foregoing subjects, at their option. NOTE. Only students admitted prior to January 1, 1873, and who are candidates for a pass certificate, have an option of passing in constitutional law and legal history, or Roman law; common law or equity; and real and personal property law. INNER TEMPLE. The Masters of the Bench have awarded pupil scholarships of 100 guineas each to the undermentioned students: -Equity, Mr. Charles H. Grafton; real property law, Mr. W. Brinton. In common law no scholarship was awarded. UNITED LAW STUDENTS' SOCIETY. On Monday, the 12th inst., a meeting of this society was held at the Law Institution under the presidency of Mr. D'A. B. Collyer, when the following moot was discussed:-"A collision occurring between an omnibus and a goods van through the joint and equal negligence of the driver of each, can a passenger in the omnibus who sustains injury thereby maintain an action against the owner of the van? (Thorogood v. Bryan, 8 C. B. 115, 1 S. L. C. 315, 316, 8th ed.)." The discussion was opened by Mr. Mott-Whitehouse in the negative. Mr. Tillotson argued in support of, and Messrs. Nelham, Maclaren, Swepstone, and Pickersgill argued against, the opinion of the opener. Mr. Mott-Whitehouse replied, and after the president had summed up a division was taken and the moot decided in the affirmative by a majority of two. The usual weekly meeting of this society was held on Wednesday, the 14th inst., at Clement's-inn Hall, Mr. B. T. Bartrum in the chair. The motion on the paper was "That this society approves of the expulsion of the Jesuits from France." Mr. Beaumont-Morice moved the rejection of the motion, and was supported by Messrs. Derry, Kains-Jackson, W Phillips, and Pain, and opposed by Messrs. Mott-White house and Maclaren. Mr. Owen spoke upon the motion from a neutral point of view. Mr. Beaumont-Morice then replied and a division was taken, and the motion lost by a majority of five. Companies. WINDING-UP NOTICES. JOINT STOCK COMPANIES. LIMITED IN CHANCERY. BOLSOVER GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANY, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up presented July 5, directed to be heard before V.C. Bacon, on July 17. Abbott, Lincoln's inn fields, agent for Black, Chesterfield, solicitor for the petitioner FIRTH HOUSE PAPER MILLS COMPANY, LIMITED.-By an order made by the M.R. dated July 2, it was ordered that the above company be wound up. Emmet and Son, Bloomsbury sq, agents for Emmet and Walker, Halifax, solicitors for the petitioner CRAIK'S WAGON WORKS, LIMITED.-By an order made by V.C. Malins, dated July 2, it was ordered that the winding up of the above company be continued. Beswick and Co, Bedford row, agents for Blakeley, Scarborough, solicitor for the petitioner JOHN WEBSTER AND COMPANY, LIMITED.-V.C. Malins has, by an order dated July 1, appointed Robert Mayo, Birmingham, to be official liquidator OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE TOILET CLUB, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up presented July 5, directed to be heard before the M.R. on July 17. Lickorish, Walbrook, solicitor for the petitioner PROPRIETORS OF THE KINGSTON-UPON-HULL AND SCULCOATES PUBLIC Rooms.-Petition for winding up, presented July 1, directed to be heard before the M.R. on July 17. Redpath and Holdsworth, Bush lane, agents for, Shackles and Son, Kingston-upon-Hull, solicitors far the petitioner SOUTH YORKSHIRE AERATED WATER COMPANY, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up, presented July 8, directed to be heard before the M.R. on July 17. Pearce and Co, Grocer's hall ct, agents for Lea royd and Co, Hundersfield, solicitors for the petitioner TOPSHAM, WOODBURY, AND LYMPSTONE WATERWORKS ACT.-TheM.E. has fixed Monday, July 19, at 12 at his chambers for the appointmnet of an official liquidator. [Gazette, July 9.] CIVIL SERVICE MEAT SUPPLY ASSOCIATION, LIMITED.-V.C. Baca has, by an order dated June 12, appointed Alfred Audrey Broad, Walbrooke, to be official liquidator GENERAL PRODUCE TRADING COMPANY, LIMITED.-By an order made by the M.R., dated July 3, it was ordered that the above company be wound up. Merediths and Co, New sq, Lincoln's inn, agents for Sibly, Bristol, solicitor for the petitioners GRAFENBERG HOUSE (BARNET) HYDROPATHIC ESTABLISHMENT, LIMITED.-The M.R. has, by an order dated June 24, appointed John Folland Lovering, Gresham st, to be official liquidator LAND AND FINANCE CORPORATION, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up July 10, directed to be heard before V.C. Malins on July 33. Rushworth and Co, Bedford row SAINT PETERSBURG NEW WATER WORKS COMPANY, LIMITED.-Peti tion for winding up presented July 10, directed to be heard before V.C. Hall on July 23. Young and Co, St Mildred's ct, Poultry, solicitors for the petitioner SOUTH YORKSHIRE AERATED WATER Company, LIMITED.-Petition for winding up presented July 8, directed to be heard before the M.R. on July 17. Peace and Co, Grocers' hall ct, agents for Learoyd and Co, Huddersfield, solicitors for the petitioner WINE AND SPIRIT TRADE COMPANY, LIMITED. By an order made by V.C. Malins dated July 2, it was ordered that the above company be wound up. Maynard, Clifford's inn, solicitor for the said petitioner [Gazette, July 13.] The Scotsman announces the death of Mr. W. Wilson, of the old-established Edinburgh firm of Dundas & Wilson, W.S., which took place at his residence in Melville-street on Thursday week. The deceased was born in 1805, and had thus attained his seventy-fourth year. He had been ailing for some months, but may be said to have died in harness. The son of a Writer to the Signet, Mr. Wilson was trained to the same profession, bis education being conducted at the Edinburgh High School and University. Besides taking his share in the extensive business of the firm with which he was through life connected, he long acted as a director of the Scottish Widows' Fund, and as an ordinary director of the Royal Bank. Solicitors' Cases. HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION. July 12.-In the Matter of a Solicitor. W. Murray, who appeared on behalf of the Incorporated Law Society, called the attention of the court to the fact that though the money had been paid to the solicitor as far back as September, 1878, he had only paid it over in June last, and that, too, subsequently to the date at which the present rule had been obtained against him. COCKBURN, L.C.J., said that, to say the least of it, the solicitor had been guilty of great carelessness. The amount was very small, and the case was hardly one for suspension. The rule, however, would be discharged only on the terms that he should pay all the costs of this application.-Times. second piece came, with the remaining portion of the 220 yards now sued for. On receiving the plaintiff's invoice, namely, on the 24th, the defendants on the same day wrote to the plaintiff refusing to accept the cloth, on the ground that it was not made according to agreement, and that it was too weak to be of any use. The plaintiff replied by letter that the cloth had been made purposely for the defendants, and according to agreement, and that it would not be taken back. Upon these facts I have come to the conclusion that this action cannot be supported, and that upon two grounds-first, that the contract in this case being executory, no property passed to the defendants until acceptance or approval by them. The law is clear, that where a chattel is ordered to be made the right of property is not vested in the party who gives the order, nor the right to the price in the vendor, until the thing ordered is completed, and has been approved of by the purchaser or some person appointed on his behalf to inspect the materials and workmanship. In giving judgment in Street v. Bray (2 B. & Ad. 463), Lord Tenterden said, "Where an article is ordered from a manufacturer, who contracts that it shall be of a certain quality or fit for a certain purpose, the purchaser may either refuse to receive or he may return the article as soon as he detects its price." In the present case the sale by the plaintiff to the deficiency, and thereby wholly defeat an action for the defendants was conditional, to become absolute only upon the cloth answering a specified purpose. The defendant, who had had experience of the strength required in cloth for the purposes of this particular trade, found by inspection that it was deficient and would not answer the purpose, and a trial was unnecessary, and the cases show that under such circumstances the defendants had the right to reject (Andrews v. Belfield, 2 C. B. N. S., 789; Lucy v. Monplet, 5 H. & N. 229). In the case before me I am satisfied from the facts that the contract between the parties was that the plaintiff was to furnish the defendants with a material suitable for the purpose required and described, that it was not in the nature of a warranty, but in fact conditional sale, that it would answer such purpose. Although no trial was made by the defendants as to the fitness of the material supplied, the evidence on that head satisfied me that the defendants had not got that they had bargained for, and hence there was no contract upon which an implied promise to pay could be raised. The second ground on which, if it stood alone, the plaintiff must fail, arises from the fact that the plaintiff, on an order for fifty yards, sent 220. The law upon this is that where more goods are sent than the purchaser agreed to buy, he may refuse to receive any portion of the goods s0 sent, and is not bound to incur risk or trouble in selecting some things and sending back others. In such cases the seller does not comply with his contract by tendering or delivering either more or less than the exact quantity contracted for (Hart v. Mills, 15 M. & W. 85; Cunliffe v. Harrison, 6 Ex. 903). Being of opinion that either of these grounds is an answer to the plaintiff's action, there must be a verdict entered for the defendants, with costs. a Dunn, for the plaintiff. Quarter Sessions. His HONOUR, who had reserved his judgment in this case, said:-This is an action brought to recover from the defendants £13 5s. 10d., being the amount claimed for the manufacture by the plaintiff of 220 yards of hemp sheeting made to the defendants' order, and which sheeting the defendants refused to accept. The plaintiff is a linen manufacturer in Leeds, and the defendants carry on the business of grease extractors at Dewsbury. In the month of August last the defendant Hirst called at the plaintiff's place of business with a view of ascertaining whether the plaintiff could make a linen cloth suitable for the purpose of extracting under pressure grease from shoddy and similar materials, the defendant describing the kind of cloth which had been sup plied to him for that purpose by a firm at Hull, but whose works were at that time closed. At that interview it was agreed that the plaintiff should, as an experiment, make some cloth such as was required, and that if it was successful future (Before PHILIP CHASEMORE GATES, Esq., Q.C., Recorder) orders were to follow. The price was left an open question. There was a conflict of evidence at the hearing between the plaintiff and defendant as to the number of yards which were to be made for the purpose of the experiment, the plaintiff alleging it was 220 yards and the defendant 50. Upon carefully weighing the facts, I have arrived at the conclusion that the actual number of yards agreed upon was 50, and not 220. On the 14th September the plaintiff sent to the defendants' manufactory at Dewsbury a piece of the manufactured cloth containing 105 yards, but as it was unaccompanied by any letter or other means of ascertaining who was the sender, it lay on the defendants' premises untouched until the 24th of September, when the BRIGHTON. July 9.-Reg. v. Latter. The prisoner was indicted for stealing fifty-one iron bolts and fifty rivets, the property of his master, Job Pack. After the recorder had summed up, the jury did not quit the box, but on their turning round Evershed (Clerk of the Peace).-"Gentlemen are you all agreed upon your verdict?" Several Jurymen.-" We are." Evershed." Which is your foreman ?" The jury turned about again, and some said, "We haven't elected one." Evershed. "You say the prisoner is not guilty and that is the verdict of you all? The Foreman.-"Yes." The learned RECORDER made a note in his book and the clerk of the peace recorded the verdict in the court book and also on the back of the indictment. The COURT then adjourned for twenty minutes. The prisoner had been removed from the dock; two of the jurymen had left the box and gone out of court; and two more had left the box but remained in court, when a juryman called the attention of the usher to the circumstance that the verdict as given by the foreman was not that of the jury. The RECORDER was sent for, and on his asking the jury whether there was any mistake about the verdict, he was informed that the verdict was Guilty, but recommended to mercy on account of his previous good character." 66 The RECORDER (to the foreman).-"Is that what you meant when you said not guilty on the grouud of his previous good character?" The Foreman.-"Yes, Sir." The RECORDER." Then this seems to be a clear mistake, but I do not see that I can do anything until the prisoner is present." The prisoner was brought back into court and placed in the dock, his counsel protesting against this course. Merrifield, for the prosecution, called attention to Roscoe's Criminal Evidence, 9th ed., p. 223:-"Verdict.-If by mistake the jury deliver a wrong verdict (as where it is delivered without the concurrence of all), and it is recorded, and a few minutes elapse before they correct the mistake, the record of the verdict may also be corrected: R. v. Parkins (1 Moo. C. C. 46). In R. v. Vodden (Dears. C. C. 229, 23 L. J. M. C. 7), one of the jury pronounced a verdict of Not Guilty,' which was entered by the clerk of the peace in his minute book, and the prisoner was discharged; other jurymen then interfered and said their verdict was 'Guilty,' whereupon the prisoner was brought back, and the jury being again asked for their verdict, they all said it was Guilty,' and that they had been unanimous; a verdict of guilty having been recorded, it was held by the Court of Criminal Appeal that the verdict was properly amended and that the conviction must stand." Warner Sleigh, for the prisoner, pointed out that the same case was treated on in Archbold's Criminal Pleading, 19th ed., p. 179, and in that comment there was a very material addition. The learned author said, "The jury themselves may, before the verdict is recorded (or even promptly after, the verdict is recorded: R. v. Parkin, 1 Moo. C. C. 45) rectify their verdict, and it will stand as ultimately amended (1 Chit. Crim. L. 647). This may be done even after the defendant has been discharged (in pursuance of a supposed verdict of acquittal) out of the dock, if before the jury have left the box: R. v. Vodden (Dears. 229, 23 L. J. (M. C.) 7.)" Here that essential was absent. The jury had left the box, had discharged their panel and separated. [He proposed to adduce the testimony of some of the jurymen as to what had actually happened. This was allowed, although no further oath than the jury oath originally taken was administered. It was deposed that two of the jury had left the box, proceeded through the outer hall and vestibule of the court into the lobby, and so to the porch, a distance of some two hundred yards from the jury box, though they had not actually passed from beneath the roof of the building. Two others had not quitted the court, although one had wholly, and the other partially, left the box. It did not transpire whether any of the four had spoken to, or been spoken with, by any of the outside public. The learned Recorder made a note of the facts as thus taken to be proved, and they were agreed to as correct by the jury and the counsel on both sides.] The jury had made deliverance between the Crown and the prisoner at the bar. They had fully performed their duty, and were then functi officio. Should the prisoner be again indicted for the same charge he might plead autrefois acquit." The RECORDER doubted that proposition. Merrifield contended that the jury had not actually separated and been discharged of their panel. The RECORDER took time to consider, the prisoner being released on bail until five o'clock. At that hour, The RECORDER said that, entertaining no doubt in his own mind that the jury had not actually sepa rated, and that, therefore, the opportunity of amendment established by R. v. Vodden had not gone by, he did not think he ought to grant a case, and, therefore, there was no pretext for respiting judgment. As the prose cutor desired to join in the recommendation of the jury, he (the Recorder) had great pleasure in giving effect to that re commendation by sentencing the prisoner to only one month's imprisonment with hard labour. THE LAW OF LIBEL. THE Select Committee appointed to inquire into the present state of the law of libel held its final meeting on Wednesday, the Attorney-General in the chair. The following report was adopted, and afterwards presented to the House: "(1) Your committee have not thought it necessary to call witnesses upon the matters referred to them. They have had the advantage of the evidence taken by the Select Com mittee of 1879, who, owing to the short time at their disposal, were unable to report, and your committee are of opinion that through the labours of the former committee sufficient information has been accumulated for the purposes of this inquiry. "(2) Your committee have confined themselves to an examination of the state of the law affecting civil actions and criminal prosecutions for newspaper libel, and to the changes which, in their judgment, should be made therein. "(3) It appears to your committee that one of the most important points of the subject referred to them is the ques tion of extension of privilege to newspaper reports of the proceedings of a public meeting. "(4) Your committee, after careful consideration, have come to the conclusion that the balance of convenience requires that further protection should be given to such reports. "(5) Your committee accordingly recommend that any report published in any newspaper of the proceedings of a public meeting should be privileged if such meeting was lawfully convened for a lawful purpose, and was open to the public, and if such report was fair and accurate and published without malice, and if the publication of the matter complained of was for the public benefit. "(6) But your committee are of opinion that such protection should not be available as a defence in any proceed. ing if the plaintiff or prosecutor can show that the defendant has refused to insert a reasonable letter or statement of explanation or contradiction by or on behalf of such plaintiff or prosecutor. "(7) Your committee recommend that no criminal prosecution for libel published in a newspaper shall be commenced against the proprietor, publisher, or any one responsible for the publication of a newspaper for any libe! published therein without the fiat of the Attorney-General being first obtained. 66 (8) Your committee are also of opinion that the name of every proprietor of a newspaper, or in the case of several persons engaged as partners in such proprietorship the names of all such persons should be registered at the office of the Registrar of Joint-Stock Companies, with fall particulars of the addresses and occupations of all such persons or of any change therein." Creditors' Claims. CREDITORS UNDER ESTATES IN CHANCERY. ATKINSON, ELIZABETH, Temple Sowerby, Westmorland. July 28. BROOKS, WILLIAM, Caistor, Lincoln, Farmer. July 31. Pell v GABBITTASS, GEORGE, Beckingham, Notts, Farmer. July 27. Gabbittass v Gabbittass, V.C. Hall. Hodding and Beevor, Work ASTON, EDWARD, Eglwysilian, Glamorgan, Gent. Sept 1. Davies v Aston, V.C. Hall. Jones, Cardiff COBBY, HENRY, Sheffield, Gent. Aug 10. Cobby v Cobby, M.R. Esam, Sheffield DUFFY, JOHN, Cambridge st, Hyde Park, Lodging House Keeper. Aug 19. White v Brooshooft, V.C. Hall. Berry and Binns, Chancery lane HALL, TRAYTON JOHN, Foley st, Fitzroy sq, Commission Agent. Aug 15. Siminton v Hall, V.C. Malins. Minchin, Newgate st PRICE, JAMES GILBERT, Llancillow Hall, Hereford, Esq. July 31. Price v Price, V.C. Bacon. Barlow, Leadenhall st WILLSON, GEORGE, Greenwich, Ironmonger. July 31. Willson v Willson, V.C. Malins. Bristow, Greenwich [Gazette, July 9.] CREDITORS UNDER 22 & 23 VICT. CAP. 25. LAST DAY OF CLAIM. ANDERSON, JOHN, Liverpool, Merchant. Sept 1. Collins and Co, Liverpool ATKINSON, HANNAH, Freke rd, Wandsworth. July 31. Nicholls, Gresham st BIDDLE, CHARLES, Wednesbury, Stafford, Grocer. Aug 1. Thursfield and Messiter, Wednesbury BRINDLEY, JOHN, Birmingham, Butcher. Aug 2. Ansell, Birming ham BROOKS, EMILY MARGARET, Bentinck ter, Regent's pk. July 31. Crowdy and Co, Serjeants' inn, Fleet st BUBB, FREDERICK EDWIN, Charlton Kings, Gloucester, Gent. Aug 1. Bonnor, Gloucester BURRELL Dame HENRIETTA KATHERINE, Castle Goring, Sussex. Aug 30. Domville and Co, New sq, Lincoln's inn CARTER, ANN, Copthorne, Surrey. July 31. Webber, jun, Furnival's inn CARTER, WILLIAM, Copthorne, Surrey, Gent. July 31. Webber, jun, COAPE, ANNA MARIA, Lyncombe Rise, Bath. July 31. Gedge and CORBETT, THOMAS, Gracechurch st, Australian Merchant. Sept 1. West and Co, Cannon st DODD, JOHN, Hartley, Westmoreland, Gent. August 9. Preston, Kirkby Stephen DORAN, REDMOND, Tranquilla-terrace, Hammersmith, Gent. Aug 20. Watson and Co, Bridge-rd, Hammersmith EVERITT, ANN, Albion-grove, Barnsbury. Aug 3. Francis, Lan. caster-pl, Strand FLETCHER, MARTHA JANE, Burnley. Aug 1. Artindale and Artindale, Burnley FLETCHER, BROWN, Burnley, Lancaster. Aug 1. Artindale and Arindale, Burnley HALLIDAY, ELIZABETH, New Park st, Leeds. Sept 30. Eddison and Eddison, Leeds HAMPTON, Right Honourable JOHN SOMERSET BARON, Westwood Park, Worcester. Aug 9. Curtler and Davis, Worcester HENRIQUES, AMоs, Upper Berkeley st. Portman sq, Esq, M.D. Sept 30. Lousada and Emanuel, Austin Friars HIGHFIELD, JOSEPH, Stafford, Engine Driver. Aug 3. Spilsbury, Stafford JACKSON, STEPHEN WESTON, Reading, Berks, Gent. July 31. Simpson and Co, Moorgate st KIBBLE, JAMES, Lewisham, Kent, Gent. July 30. Parker and Son, Lewisham LLOYD, THEODORE, Old Broad st, Esq. July 31. Webber, junr, Furnival's-inn MACKRELL, SUSAN, New Arlesford, Southampton. Aug 5. Marsh. field and Hutchins, Wareham MARRIAGE, EDMUND, Hereford gardens, Corn Merchant. Aug 1, Woodard, Chelmsford OSMOND, JAMES, Plymouth, Licensed Victualler. Aug 7. Pearse, Plymouth PRITCHARD, WILLIAM, Penybout, Llanrwst, Denbigh, Hotel Keeper Aug 12. Griffith, Llanrwst QUINLAN, WILLIAM STEPHEN LOUIS, Dawlish, Somerset, a Com-mander in H.M.'s Navy. Aug 12. Simmous and Co, Bath. RESTARICK, JAMES, Devonport, Timber-measurer in H.M.'s Dockyard. Aug 7. Pearse, Plymouth ROOPE, CABEL, Oporto, Portugal, Merchant. Aug 1. Philpot and Son, Bedford row ROYDS, HENRY BOND, Albion st, Hyde Park. Aug 1. Valpy and Co, Lincoln's-inn-fields WALLINGTON, GEORGE, Abergavenny, Monmouth, Saddler. July 21. Gabb and Walford, Abergavenny WEBSDALE, ELIJAH, Baker st, Marylebone, Tailor. Aug 16. Deane and Co, South sq, Gray's inn [Gazette, July 2.] ARNALD, SEBASTIAN WYNDHAM, Chelmsford, Essex, Gent. Aug 14. Gosnell, Moorgate st. AUSTIN, MATTHEW, Broad Hinton, Wilts, Farmer. Aug 1. Townsend, Swindon BAMFORD, THOMAS, Suffolk, Stationer. Aug 10. Wiltshire, Hall Plain, Great Yarmouth BROWNE, WILLIAM MEREDITH, King st, Covent Garden, Esq. Ang 14. Walls and Co, Queen Victoria st BULGIN, JAMES, Brighton, Confectioner. July 31. Penfold and Son, Brighton BUNCE, GEORGE, Wimbledom, Surrey, Farmer. July 30. Dodd, New inn, Strand CAPPE, WILLIAM, Waddington, Lincoln, Esq. Tweed and Co, Lincoln CROSSLEY, JAMES, Lewisham High road, Deptford, Gent. July 21. Sandon and Co, Gracechurch st ELLIOTT, JOSEPH, Seaton Sluice, Northumberland, Innkeeper. Aug 21. Dent, York FEGAN, JOHN, Exeter, Chemist. Aug 6. Fryer, Exeter GILES, NETLAM JOHN, Richmond, Surrey, Gent. July 31. Taylor and Son, Field ct, Gray's inn HANDLEY, ISAAC JOHN, Erdington, nr Birmingham, Steel Toy Maker.. Aug 16. Canning and Canning, Birminghamı HAWKINS, MARY, Hanway st, Oxford st. Aug 6. Richards, Warwick st, Regent st ROGERS, JOHN JOPE, Helston, Cornwall, Esq. July 31. Rogers, Falmouth SILLY, LOUISA SOPHIA, Dartmouth, Devon. Aug 28. Smith, Dartmouth SMART, Rev JOHN, Kingswear, Clerk. Aug 2. Bartlett, Lincoln's inn fields SYKES, MARY ELIZABETH, Millbridge, Liversedge, York. Aug 25. Sykes, Heckmondwike TAYLOR, JOHN, Rochdale, Lancaster, Flannel Merchant. Aug 14. Farrar and Hall, Manchester THEOBALDS, JAMES, Durnford rd, Holloway, Gent. Aug 17. Lowless and Co, Martin's lane, Cannon st WARDLOW, WILLIAM CUSWORTH, Broomfield, Sheffield, Steel Manu facturer. Sept 3. Burdekin and Co, Sheffield [Gazette, July 6.1 ASTBURY, HANNAH, Munster terrace, Fulham. Sept 1. Pattison and Co, Queen Victoria st ATHILL, SARAH, Durham rd, Seven Sisters rd. Aug 1. Angell and Co, Gresham st BARTLE, WILLIAM, Haxby rd, York, Gent. Ang 17. Mann and Son, York BIGLEY, ROBERT, Pointon, Lincoln, Grocer. Aug 15. Wiles and Smith, Horbling BRIGHT, RICHARD, Liverpool. Aug 9. Avison and Morton, Liverpool BROWN, JOHN, Knockmullock, Kirkcudbright. Sept 1. Lidderdale, Castle Douglas COPEMAN, Rev FREDERICK JOHN, Durham, Clerk. Aug 9 Thompson, Devereux ct, Temple DANIELL, THOMAS AVERILL, Kensal pl, Kensal green, Esq. Sept 30. Crosse and Co, Lancaster pl, Strand DAVIES, WILLIAM HENRY, Weston-super-Mare, Gent. Aug 2. Davies, Weston-super-Mare ENGLAND, EDWARD, Bracondale, Norwich, Gent. Aug 16. Emerson, Norwich FAITHFULL, GEORGE ALEXANDER, Canonbury park, South, Islington Sept 7. Bloxams and Ellison, Lincoln's inn fields FRY, JOHN LIDDON, Stockland, Devon, Tailor. Aug 2. Webster, GILBURD, WILLIAM, Horsham, Sussex, Leather Seller. Aug 1. ISAAC, GREGORY, South Shore, Blackpool. Sept 7. May and Parry, Blackpool GRIFFITHS, JAMES, Flodden rd, Camberwell, Cabinet Manufacturer. Aug 8. Hudson and Co, Bucklersbury GROVER, WILLIAM, High st, Stratford, Gent. Aug 10. Hillearys and Taylor, Fenchurch bdgs GWYN, WILLIAM EDWARD BEVAN, Llangain, Carmarthen, Esq. Oct 1 Thomas and Brown, Carmarthen HALL, COLLINSON, senr, Navestock, Essex, Farmer. Aug 10.. Hillearys and Taylor, Fenchurch bdgs HARDING, PENELOPE, Bootle, Lancaster. July 28. Lynch and Teebay, Liverpool HIGGINS, JOHN, Cheltenham, Trunk Maker. Oct 1. Wheeler, Cheltenham LIDDALL, ARTHUR, Barnsley, York, Blacksmith. Sept 7. Rideal, Barnsley PEARSON, WILLIAM, Wavertree, nr Liverpool, Gent. Aug 5. Banks. and Kendall, Liverpool SMYTH, Rev. HUGH BLAGG, Houghton Regis, Clerk. Aug 21. Boyes, Barnet STEPHENS, THOMAS, Devonport, Baker. Aug 14. Gard, Devonport STUBBIN, JAMES, Birmingham, Solicitor. Aug 1. Wragge and Co, Birmingham SYMONS, THOMAS, King's rd, Chelsea, Gent. Sept 29. Miller, Arthur ts, Chelsea THOMAS, RICHARD, Kimberly Mine, Griqualand West, South Africa, Miner. Dec 24. Trythall, Penzance TINKLER, EMMA ELIZA, Sharsted st, Kennington park. Aug 6. Hubbard and Co, Bucklersbury Aug 9. VACHER, THOMAS BRITTAIN, Stanley crescent, Kensington park, YATES, THOMAS, Farnworth, nr Bolton, out of business. Sept 29. ALLCOCK, WILLIAM, Cotton, Stafford, Yeoman. and Son, Leek [Gazette, July 9.] ASTLEY, MARGARET, Hetherington rd, Clapham. Hungerford Oct 12. Redfern Aug 1. Astley, BAKER, SARAH, Lower Brook st, Ipswich. Sept 20. Jackaman and Sons, Ipswich BARNFIELD, ALFRED, Nottingham, [Outfitter. Sept 1. Wells and Hind, Nottingham BEDLINGTON, ISAAC, West Hartlepool, Shipowner. Aug 7. Turnbull and Tilly, West Hartlepool BOUCHERETT, JULIANA, Clarendon sq, Warwick. Aug 18. Stuart, Gray's inn sq CALDWELL, JOHN, Starcross, Devon, Gent. Aug 19. Child, South 8q, Gray's inn CARRINGTON, JOHN NARNDALL, Wokingham, Berks, Gent. Oct 1 Cooke, Wokingham CATCHPOLE, THOMAS, Elmswell, Suffolk, Farmer. Sept 1. Golding, Walsham-le-willows CHRISTIE, HARRIET, Folkstone, Kent. Aug 11. Blandy and Witherington, Reading CLUDERAY, CHARLES, Leeds, Clerk to the Holbeck Union. Sept 13. Tempest, Leeds COLE, WILLIAM JAMES, Westbourne villas, Paddington, Surgeon. Aug 9. M'Clellan, Bedford row. FARMER, JVMES, Nottingham, Gent. Sept 1. Wells and Hine, Notting ham BILLS IN COMMITTEE. Elementary Education, Union Assessment Committee (Single Parishes), Local Government Provisional Orders (Abergavenny, &c.), Local Government Provisional Orders (Amersham Union, &c.), County Bridges, Isle of Man (Loans) (all passed through Committee). BILLS READ A THIRD TIME. PRIVATE BILL.-London, Brighton, and South Coast Railway. Local Government Provisional Orders (Poor Law). JULY 9.-ROYAL ASSENT. Local Government Board (Gas) Provisional Order Confirmation, Local Government Board (Highways) Provisional Order Confirmation, Drainage and Improvement of Lands (Ireland), Local Government Board Provisional Orders Confirmation (Abingdon, &c.), Metropolitan Commons, Local Government Board (Ireland) Provisional Orders Confirmation (Ballinasloe, &c.), General Police and Improvement (Scotland) Act, 1862, Órder Confirmation (Broughty Ferry), Local Government Board (Ireland) Provisional Orders Confirmation (Banbridge, &c.), Greencastle and Kilkeel Railway (Abandonment), Clacton-on-Sea Special Drainage District, Loose Valley Railway, Newry Port and Harbour, Milford Docks (Extension of Time), Eastbourne Gas, Didcot, Newbury, and Southampton Junction Railway, Helston Railway, Bristol Port and Channel Dock, West Wickham and Hayes Railway, Aberdare Markets and Town-hall, Shrewsbury (Kingsland) Bridge, Stapenbill Bridge, Corris Railway, Swansea Harbour (Extension of Time), Southern Railway (Central Extension Abandonment), Wakefield Corporation Waterworks, Blenheim Settled Estates, Leitrim Estates, and Lonsdale Settled Estates. BILLS READ A SECOND TIME. Local Government Provisional Orders (Ashford, &c.), Local Government Provisional Orders (Bethesda, &c.). BILLS READ A THIRD TIME. Elementary Education, Union Assessment Committee (Single Parishes), County Bridges. JULY 12.-BILLS READ A SECOND TIME. PRIVATE BILLS.-Devon and Cornwall Railway, Liverpool Tramways, London and North-Western Railway, Maidstone Gas, Metropolitan Railway, Midland Railway, Preston Tramways. BILLS READ A THIRD TIME. PRIVATE BILLS.-Exmouth and District Water, Malton Gas, Huddersfield Tramways and Improvement Bill (Amendments). JULY 13.-BILLS READ A SECOND TIME. Enclosure Provisional Order (Abbotside Common), Local Government Provisional Orders (Aberavon, &c.). BILLS READ A THIRD TIME: PRIVATE BILLS.-Manchester Carriage Company (Limited), Manchester Suburban Tramways Company, Marquis of Abergavenny's Estate. Elementary Education Provisional Orders (Ashford, &c.), Elementary Education Provisional Orders Compensation (Cardiff, &c.). HOUSE OF COMMONS. JULY 8.-BILL IN COMMITTEE, Wild Birds Protection Law Amendment. BILLS READ A THIRD TIME. PRIVATE BILLS.-Brentford and Isleworth Tramways, Dagenham and District Farmers' (Optional) Sewage Utili lization, Hinckley Local Board Gas, Lynn and Fakenham Railway, Rickmansworth Extension Railway, Yarmouth Union Railway, Lonsdale Settled Estates. Statutes (Definition of Time). JULY 9.-BILL IN COMMITTEE. South-Western (of London) District Post-Office. |