The Oklahoma Law Journal, Volume 8Dennis, 1909 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 72
Page 5
... United States ( C. C. A. , 7th Cir . , ) 22 Am . B. R. 32 , it was held that without adjudication as a bankrupt within the meaning of the Bankrupty Act , a conviction upon a charge of concealing from his trustee , while a bankrupt ...
... United States ( C. C. A. , 7th Cir . , ) 22 Am . B. R. 32 , it was held that without adjudication as a bankrupt within the meaning of the Bankrupty Act , a conviction upon a charge of concealing from his trustee , while a bankrupt ...
Page 12
... ( United States v . Turead , 20 Fed . p . 521 ) The constitutional provision in the Bill of Rights is but a reiteration of this essential safeguard of the liberty and security of the citizen against the arbitrary action of those in ...
... ( United States v . Turead , 20 Fed . p . 521 ) The constitutional provision in the Bill of Rights is but a reiteration of this essential safeguard of the liberty and security of the citizen against the arbitrary action of those in ...
Page 15
... United States v . Warwick , 51 Fed . Rep . , p . 280 , is cited . This is only the individual opinion of the Con- gressional District Judge of Alaska , and is altogether unsupported by any line of reasoning . No lawyer will contend that ...
... United States v . Warwick , 51 Fed . Rep . , p . 280 , is cited . This is only the individual opinion of the Con- gressional District Judge of Alaska , and is altogether unsupported by any line of reasoning . No lawyer will contend that ...
Page 17
... United States vs. Hess , 124 U. S. 483 . Second . The position that the date of the alleged offense charged in the information or indictment is sufficient to put the defendant upon notice of the particular offense which he is required ...
... United States vs. Hess , 124 U. S. 483 . Second . The position that the date of the alleged offense charged in the information or indictment is sufficient to put the defendant upon notice of the particular offense which he is required ...
Page 19
... United States , and that case was reversed in part on this account . The same question came up again in the case Hendrix vs. United States . The in- struction was again condemned , but held to be harmless error in that case for reasons ...
... United States , and that case was reversed in part on this account . The same question came up again in the case Hendrix vs. United States . The in- struction was again condemned , but held to be harmless error in that case for reasons ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affidavit Affirmed alleged allotment allottee approval authority bankruptcy bidder Blaine County Board Bryan county case-made cause charge clerk Comanche County concur constitution contract counsel County Court County Judge Court of Appeals Creek Custer county Defendant in Error District Court election Error from District evidence facts filed five civilized tribes Garfield County Grady County granted heirs held hereby Indian Territory indictment instructions issue judgment jurisdiction jury justice Kansas land lawyer lease lien liquors Logan County McClain County ment motion Muskogee County notice offense oil and gas Okfuskee County Okla Oklahoma County opinion party person petition plaintiff in error President proceeding prosecution question railroad reason record Rendered Section statute superior court Supreme Court Syllabus term Territory of Oklahoma therein thereof thereto tion township trial court Trial Judge tribe verdict Wilson's writ
Popular passages
Page 475 - Any county, city, town, or township may make and enforce within its limits all such local, police, sanitary, and other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws.
Page 472 - It is a general and undisputed proposition of law that a municipal corporation possesses and can exercise the following powers and no others: First, those granted in express words; second, those necessarily or fairly implied in or incident to the powers expressly granted; third, those essential to the declared objects and purposes of the corporation — not simply convenient but indispensable.
Page 28 - Now know ye, that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in consideration...
Page 12 - The judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court, Orange County, California, is vacated and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the First Amendment standards established by this opinion.
Page 139 - A member of the grand jury may, however, be required by any court, to disclose the testimony of a witness examined before the grand jury, for the purpose of ascertaining whether it is consistent with that given by the witness, before the court; or to disclose the testimony given before them by any person, upon a charge against him for perjury in giving his testimony, or upon his trial therefor.
Page 336 - River, in fee simple to them and their descendants, to inure to them while they shall exist as a nation and live on it...
Page 122 - That the act or omission charged as the offense is clearly and distinctly set forth in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended; 7.
Page 308 - The General Assembly shall pass laws to correct abuses and prevent unjust discrimination and extortion in the rates of freight and passenger tariffs on the different railroads in this state, and enforce such laws by adequate penalties, to the extent, if necessary for that purpose, of forfeiture of their property and franchises.
Page 215 - A new trial will not be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence to impeach the reputation for truth and veracity of witnesses for the state.
Page 93 - ... filing a certified copy of its articles of incorporation with the secretary of state.