The Law Magazine and Review: A Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence, Volumes 7-8Saunders and Benning, 1859 - Law |
From inside the book
Page 2
... and allowing the judges who gave the obnoxious judgment to pass without censure , is inconsistent in principle , and betrays hesitation on the part of the House , distrust of its own authority , or fear of public opinion .
... and allowing the judges who gave the obnoxious judgment to pass without censure , is inconsistent in principle , and betrays hesitation on the part of the House , distrust of its own authority , or fear of public opinion .
Page 10
There was no little conflict of opinion on the Bench in the celebrated case to which we are now alluding ; and if we may trust to the version of the proceedings in court , given by Lord Raymond , the judges allowed themselves greater ...
There was no little conflict of opinion on the Bench in the celebrated case to which we are now alluding ; and if we may trust to the version of the proceedings in court , given by Lord Raymond , the judges allowed themselves greater ...
Page 11
Besides , we are not acquainted with the learning of elections , and there is a particular cunning in it not known to us , nor do we go by the same rules , as they often determine contrary to our opinion without doors .
Besides , we are not acquainted with the learning of elections , and there is a particular cunning in it not known to us , nor do we go by the same rules , as they often determine contrary to our opinion without doors .
Page 12
It is indeed a fine opinion , but I do not know whether it will bear debating , and how it will prove when it comes to be handled . For , at common law , the patron had no remedy for damages against the disturber , but the statute 13 Ed ...
It is indeed a fine opinion , but I do not know whether it will bear debating , and how it will prove when it comes to be handled . For , at common law , the patron had no remedy for damages against the disturber , but the statute 13 Ed ...
Page 14
But the comments which the biographer makes on the general question are not , in our opinion , unimpeachable . Sir John Campbell was Attorney - General in 1839 , and argued the case of Stockdale v .
But the comments which the biographer makes on the general question are not , in our opinion , unimpeachable . Sir John Campbell was Attorney - General in 1839 , and argued the case of Stockdale v .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 62 | |
| 82 | |
| 97 | |
| 113 | |
| 131 | |
| 142 | |
| 318 | |
| 387 | |
| 402 | |
| 412 | |
| 415 | |
| 430 | |
| 450 | |
| 464 | |
| 1 | |
| 12 | |
| 27 | |
| 145 | |
| 153 | |
| 162 | |
| 174 | |
| 205 | |
| 239 | |
| 342 | |
| 351 | |
| 357 | |
| 374 | |
| 384 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adopted aged amended appear apply appointed authority bank believe bill body brought called carried cause character charge church circumstances claim committee common consider consideration course court criminal defendant doubt duty effect England English evidence examination existing expressed fact give given hand held House important instance interest judge judgment jury justice knowledge land late learned less letter London Lord matter means measure nature notice object observed obtained opinion parliament parties passed person poison possession practice present principle proceedings proposed proved provisions purchaser question railway reason reference regard relating remarks respect rule seems society Solicitor statute taken Temple term thing tion trial trust whole
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Law Magazine and Review: A Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence, Volumes 7-8 |
| Contributors | Thomas Pitt Taswell-Langmead, Charles Henry Edward Carmichael, William Pinder Eversley, Sir Sherston Baker |
| Publisher | Saunders and Benning, 1859 |
| Original from | the University of Michigan |
| Digitized | 7 Dec 2011 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |