The New Zealand Law Journal: NZLJ., Volume 55Butterworths, 1980 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 41
... determine who had authority to make the deci- sion whether there had been a personal injury by accident . The case ... determine the question . ” WHO DECIDES ? While the Commission clearly has ex- clusive jurisdiction to determine ...
... determine who had authority to make the deci- sion whether there had been a personal injury by accident . The case ... determine the question . ” WHO DECIDES ? While the Commission clearly has ex- clusive jurisdiction to determine ...
Page 53
... determining Parliamentary intention . Parliamentary debates There have been strong arguments pre- sented supporting the use of Parliamentary de- bates to determine not only the mischief with which a piece of legislation was intended to ...
... determining Parliamentary intention . Parliamentary debates There have been strong arguments pre- sented supporting the use of Parliamentary de- bates to determine not only the mischief with which a piece of legislation was intended to ...
Page 108
... determine the case before him . In determining this preliminary or prior and fundamental question , the Judge took s 5 of the Matrimonial Property Act 1976 as a convenient starting point . Subsection ( 1 ) of s 5 provides as follows ...
... determine the case before him . In determining this preliminary or prior and fundamental question , the Judge took s 5 of the Matrimonial Property Act 1976 as a convenient starting point . Subsection ( 1 ) of s 5 provides as follows ...
Contents
Denis Orme | 3 |
How Strong is New Zealands Claim | 6 |
Stewart and Tozer v Smith | v |
Copyright | |
62 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
29 February accepted action adopted agreement allowed Amendment application approval Auckland authority benefit blood cause child claim clear client Commission Committee common concerned consideration considered contract Council counsel course Court of Appeal criminal damages decision defendant determine duty effect evidence existing expressed fact February further give given ground held House important interest interpretation involved issue Judge judgment judicial justice land legislation limited Lord marriage matrimonial matter means ment nature NZLR offence P.O. Box particular parties person plaintiff Planning police position possible practice present principle procedure proceedings purchaser question reason recent referred regard relation respect result rule sion situation Society solicitor statute suggested supra taken tion tort Wellington wife Zealand