The New Zealand Law Journal: NZLJ., Volume 55Butterworths, 1980 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 87
Page 218
... Counsel is allowed to exercise the accused's right of challenge . Section 634 of the Criminal Code provides for representation of an accused by Counsel : " Every person charged with an offence is entitled to make his defence at his ...
... Counsel is allowed to exercise the accused's right of challenge . Section 634 of the Criminal Code provides for representation of an accused by Counsel : " Every person charged with an offence is entitled to make his defence at his ...
Page 219
... Counsel had not sought leave . “ The applicant's counsel had no authority to withdraw the challenge which his client had made . It was not simply unwise for counsel to attempt to override his client's action as he did , but his general ...
... Counsel had not sought leave . “ The applicant's counsel had no authority to withdraw the challenge which his client had made . It was not simply unwise for counsel to attempt to override his client's action as he did , but his general ...
Page 476
... Counsel . From the date of this memorandum ( 6 November 1980 ) a new procedure will be followed for the appointment of Queen's Counsel : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Barristers seeking appointment should write to the Solicitor - General in ...
... Counsel . From the date of this memorandum ( 6 November 1980 ) a new procedure will be followed for the appointment of Queen's Counsel : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Barristers seeking appointment should write to the Solicitor - General in ...
Contents
Denis Orme | 3 |
How Strong is New Zealands Claim | 6 |
Stewart and Tozer v Smith | v |
Copyright | |
62 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
29 February accepted action adopted agreement allowed Amendment application approval Auckland authority benefit blood cause child claim clear client Commission Committee common concerned consideration considered contract Council counsel course Court of Appeal criminal damages decision defendant determine duty effect evidence existing expressed fact February further give given ground held House important interest interpretation involved issue Judge judgment judicial justice land legislation limited Lord marriage matrimonial matter means ment nature NZLR offence P.O. Box particular parties person plaintiff Planning police position possible practice present principle procedure proceedings purchaser question reason recent referred regard relation respect result rule sion situation Society solicitor statute suggested supra taken tion tort Wellington wife Zealand