What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
advertising American antitrust Association bait believe brand name businessman cents Chairman commerce committee compete competition concerned Congress consumer cost court customers dealers Department discount houses distribution District drug economic effect enactment enforcement established fact fair trade laws Federal Trade Commission field give going Government hearings increase independent industry interest Joint Resolution 159 kind legislation less maintain manufacturer means merchandise offered operation owner percent person practices present price fixing profit protection purchased quality stabilization quality stabilization bill question reason record represent resale price reseller result retail sell Senate Joint Resolution Senator MONRONEY small business sold statement Thank thing tion trademark trying unfair United watches wholesalers
Page 179 - ... transactions, under any statute, law, or public policy now or hereafter in effect in any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia in which such resale is to be made, or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale...
Page 6 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Page 311 - ... /In the absence of any purpose to create or maintain a monopoly, the act does not restrict the long recognized right of trader or manufacturer engaged in an entirely private business, freely to exercise his own independent discretion as to parties with whom he will deal. And, of course, he may announce in advance the circumstances under which he will refuse to sell.
Page 157 - An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies", as amended, commonly known as the Sherman Act (15 USC, Sees.
Page 179 - That nothing herein contained shall render illegal, contracts or agreements prescribing minimum prices for the resale of a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trade mark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, when contracts or agreements of that description are lawful as applied...
Page 385 - When the retailer goes beyond his personal right, and, conspiring and combining with others of like purpose, seeks to obstruct the free course of interstate trade and commerce and to unduly suppress competition by placing obnoxious wholesale dealers under the coercive influence of a condemnatory report circulated among others...
Page 296 - States for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor in such part of the United States; or, to sell, or contract to sell, goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor.
Page 352 - For the purposes of this Act, a small-business concern shall be deemed to be one which is independently owned and operated and which is not dominant in its field of operation.